Cargando…

Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure

This study asks whether the spatial scale of sampling alters structural properties of food webs and whether any differences are attributable to changes in species richness and connectance with scale. Understanding how different aspects of sampling effort affect ecological network structure is import...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Spencer A, Russell, Roly, Hanson, Dieta, Williams, Richard J, Dunne, Jennifer A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1640
_version_ 1782389859664527360
author Wood, Spencer A
Russell, Roly
Hanson, Dieta
Williams, Richard J
Dunne, Jennifer A
author_facet Wood, Spencer A
Russell, Roly
Hanson, Dieta
Williams, Richard J
Dunne, Jennifer A
author_sort Wood, Spencer A
collection PubMed
description This study asks whether the spatial scale of sampling alters structural properties of food webs and whether any differences are attributable to changes in species richness and connectance with scale. Understanding how different aspects of sampling effort affect ecological network structure is important for both fundamental ecological knowledge and the application of network analysis in conservation and management. Using a highly resolved food web for the marine intertidal ecosystem of the Sanak Archipelago in the Eastern Aleutian Islands, Alaska, we assess how commonly studied properties of network structure differ for 281 versions of the food web sampled at five levels of spatial scale representing six orders of magnitude in area spread across the archipelago. Species (S) and link (L) richness both increased by approximately one order of magnitude across the five spatial scales. Links per species (L/S) more than doubled, while connectance (C) decreased by approximately two-thirds. Fourteen commonly studied properties of network structure varied systematically with spatial scale of sampling, some increasing and others decreasing. While ecological network properties varied systematically with sampling extent, analyses using the niche model and a power-law scaling relationship indicate that for many properties, this apparent sensitivity is attributable to the increasing S and decreasing C of webs with increasing spatial scale. As long as effects of S and C are accounted for, areal sampling bias does not have a special impact on our understanding of many aspects of network structure. However, attention does need be paid to some properties such as the fraction of species in loops, which increases more than expected with greater spatial scales of sampling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4567879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45678792015-09-17 Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure Wood, Spencer A Russell, Roly Hanson, Dieta Williams, Richard J Dunne, Jennifer A Ecol Evol Original Research This study asks whether the spatial scale of sampling alters structural properties of food webs and whether any differences are attributable to changes in species richness and connectance with scale. Understanding how different aspects of sampling effort affect ecological network structure is important for both fundamental ecological knowledge and the application of network analysis in conservation and management. Using a highly resolved food web for the marine intertidal ecosystem of the Sanak Archipelago in the Eastern Aleutian Islands, Alaska, we assess how commonly studied properties of network structure differ for 281 versions of the food web sampled at five levels of spatial scale representing six orders of magnitude in area spread across the archipelago. Species (S) and link (L) richness both increased by approximately one order of magnitude across the five spatial scales. Links per species (L/S) more than doubled, while connectance (C) decreased by approximately two-thirds. Fourteen commonly studied properties of network structure varied systematically with spatial scale of sampling, some increasing and others decreasing. While ecological network properties varied systematically with sampling extent, analyses using the niche model and a power-law scaling relationship indicate that for many properties, this apparent sensitivity is attributable to the increasing S and decreasing C of webs with increasing spatial scale. As long as effects of S and C are accounted for, areal sampling bias does not have a special impact on our understanding of many aspects of network structure. However, attention does need be paid to some properties such as the fraction of species in loops, which increases more than expected with greater spatial scales of sampling. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-09 2015-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4567879/ /pubmed/26380704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1640 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wood, Spencer A
Russell, Roly
Hanson, Dieta
Williams, Richard J
Dunne, Jennifer A
Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure
title Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure
title_full Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure
title_fullStr Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure
title_full_unstemmed Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure
title_short Effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure
title_sort effects of spatial scale of sampling on food web structure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1640
work_keys_str_mv AT woodspencera effectsofspatialscaleofsamplingonfoodwebstructure
AT russellroly effectsofspatialscaleofsamplingonfoodwebstructure
AT hansondieta effectsofspatialscaleofsamplingonfoodwebstructure
AT williamsrichardj effectsofspatialscaleofsamplingonfoodwebstructure
AT dunnejennifera effectsofspatialscaleofsamplingonfoodwebstructure