Cargando…

Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios

Free recall of spoken words in Swedish (native tongue) and English were assessed in two signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions (+3 and +12 dB), with and without half of the heard words being repeated back orally directly after presentation [shadowing, speech intelligibility (SI)]. A total of 24 word...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hygge, Staffan, Kjellberg, Anders, Nöstl, Anatole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4568391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01390
_version_ 1782389904302407680
author Hygge, Staffan
Kjellberg, Anders
Nöstl, Anatole
author_facet Hygge, Staffan
Kjellberg, Anders
Nöstl, Anatole
author_sort Hygge, Staffan
collection PubMed
description Free recall of spoken words in Swedish (native tongue) and English were assessed in two signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions (+3 and +12 dB), with and without half of the heard words being repeated back orally directly after presentation [shadowing, speech intelligibility (SI)]. A total of 24 word lists with 12 words each were presented in English and in Swedish to Swedish speaking college students. Pre-experimental measures of working memory capacity (operation span, OSPAN) were taken. A basic hypothesis was that the recall of the words would be impaired when the encoding of the words required more processing resources, thereby depleting working memory resources. This would be the case when the SNR was low or when the language was English. A low SNR was also expected to impair SI, but we wanted to compare the sizes of the SNR-effects on SI and recall. A low score on working memory capacity was expected to further add to the negative effects of SNR and language on both SI and recall. The results indicated that SNR had strong effects on both SI and recall, but also that the effect size was larger for recall than for SI. Language had a main effect on recall, but not on SI. The shadowing procedure had different effects on recall of the early and late parts of the word lists. Working memory capacity was unimportant for the effect on SI and recall. Thus, recall appear to be a more sensitive indicator than SI for the acoustics of learning, which has implications for building codes and recommendations concerning classrooms and other workplaces, where both hearing and learning is important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4568391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45683912015-10-05 Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios Hygge, Staffan Kjellberg, Anders Nöstl, Anatole Front Psychol Psychology Free recall of spoken words in Swedish (native tongue) and English were assessed in two signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions (+3 and +12 dB), with and without half of the heard words being repeated back orally directly after presentation [shadowing, speech intelligibility (SI)]. A total of 24 word lists with 12 words each were presented in English and in Swedish to Swedish speaking college students. Pre-experimental measures of working memory capacity (operation span, OSPAN) were taken. A basic hypothesis was that the recall of the words would be impaired when the encoding of the words required more processing resources, thereby depleting working memory resources. This would be the case when the SNR was low or when the language was English. A low SNR was also expected to impair SI, but we wanted to compare the sizes of the SNR-effects on SI and recall. A low score on working memory capacity was expected to further add to the negative effects of SNR and language on both SI and recall. The results indicated that SNR had strong effects on both SI and recall, but also that the effect size was larger for recall than for SI. Language had a main effect on recall, but not on SI. The shadowing procedure had different effects on recall of the early and late parts of the word lists. Working memory capacity was unimportant for the effect on SI and recall. Thus, recall appear to be a more sensitive indicator than SI for the acoustics of learning, which has implications for building codes and recommendations concerning classrooms and other workplaces, where both hearing and learning is important. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4568391/ /pubmed/26441765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01390 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hygge, Kjellberg and Nöstl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hygge, Staffan
Kjellberg, Anders
Nöstl, Anatole
Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios
title Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios
title_full Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios
title_fullStr Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios
title_full_unstemmed Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios
title_short Speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios
title_sort speech intelligibility and recall of first and second language words heard at different signal-to-noise ratios
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4568391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441765
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01390
work_keys_str_mv AT hyggestaffan speechintelligibilityandrecalloffirstandsecondlanguagewordsheardatdifferentsignaltonoiseratios
AT kjellberganders speechintelligibilityandrecalloffirstandsecondlanguagewordsheardatdifferentsignaltonoiseratios
AT nostlanatole speechintelligibilityandrecalloffirstandsecondlanguagewordsheardatdifferentsignaltonoiseratios