Cargando…

Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous reports assessing the reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-E) in evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL) involved only experienced endosonographers. We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement (IOA) of EUS-E in the evaluation of SPL b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soares, João-Bruno, Iglesias-Garcia, Julio, Gonçalves, Bruno, Lindkvist, Björn, Lariño-Noia, Jose, Bastos, Pedro, Caetano, Ana Célia, Ferreira, Aníbal, Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro, Lopes, Luís, Moutinho-Ribeiro, Pedro, Dominguez-Muñoz, J. Enrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4568638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374584
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.163016
_version_ 1782389944221696000
author Soares, João-Bruno
Iglesias-Garcia, Julio
Gonçalves, Bruno
Lindkvist, Björn
Lariño-Noia, Jose
Bastos, Pedro
Caetano, Ana Célia
Ferreira, Aníbal
Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro
Lopes, Luís
Moutinho-Ribeiro, Pedro
Dominguez-Muñoz, J. Enrique
author_facet Soares, João-Bruno
Iglesias-Garcia, Julio
Gonçalves, Bruno
Lindkvist, Björn
Lariño-Noia, Jose
Bastos, Pedro
Caetano, Ana Célia
Ferreira, Aníbal
Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro
Lopes, Luís
Moutinho-Ribeiro, Pedro
Dominguez-Muñoz, J. Enrique
author_sort Soares, João-Bruno
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous reports assessing the reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-E) in evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL) involved only experienced endosonographers. We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement (IOA) of EUS-E in the evaluation of SPL by endoscopists with different levels of experience in EUS and EUS-E. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational multicenter study was designed and included 11 endoscopists who were divided into four groups: Group A (long experience in EUS and EUS-E); Group B (short experience in EUS and EUS-E); Group C (long experience in EUS and no experience in EUS-E); and Group D (no experience in EUS or EUS-E). The observers independently classified the patterns of 60 video sequences of EUS-E, after a 20-min training session. For each group, we calculated IOA (kappa statistic, κ) of EUS-E and the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-E for pancreatic malignancy, by comparing the pattern of EUS-E indicative of malignancy (heterogeneous or homogenous blue) with the final diagnosis. RESULTS: The overall IOA was moderate (κ = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.52). The IOA of Group A (κ = 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-1.00) was significantly higher than that of Groups B (κ = 0.54; 95%CI 0.40-0.71), C (κ = 0.54; 95%CI 0.39-0.68), and D (κ = 0.28; 95%CI 0.14-0.40). IOA of Groups B and C was not significantly different, but it was significantly higher than that of Group D. The diagnostic accuracy of Group A (area under the curve under summary receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) = 0.83; 95%CI 0.75-0.90) was not significantly different from that of Group B (AUROC = 0.77; 95%CI 0.71-0.83), but it was significantly higher than that of Groups C (AUROC = 0.74; 95%CI 0.67-0.81) and D (AUROC = 0.74; 95%CI 0.67-0.81). No significant difference was seen between Groups B, C, and D for diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: EUS-E is reproducible in the evaluation of SPL, even between endoscopists with no or limited experience in EUS and/or EUS-E. Reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy increase with experience in EUS and EUS-E.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4568638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45686382015-09-30 Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions Soares, João-Bruno Iglesias-Garcia, Julio Gonçalves, Bruno Lindkvist, Björn Lariño-Noia, Jose Bastos, Pedro Caetano, Ana Célia Ferreira, Aníbal Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro Lopes, Luís Moutinho-Ribeiro, Pedro Dominguez-Muñoz, J. Enrique Endosc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous reports assessing the reproducibility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-E) in evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions (SPL) involved only experienced endosonographers. We aimed to assess the interobserver agreement (IOA) of EUS-E in the evaluation of SPL by endoscopists with different levels of experience in EUS and EUS-E. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational multicenter study was designed and included 11 endoscopists who were divided into four groups: Group A (long experience in EUS and EUS-E); Group B (short experience in EUS and EUS-E); Group C (long experience in EUS and no experience in EUS-E); and Group D (no experience in EUS or EUS-E). The observers independently classified the patterns of 60 video sequences of EUS-E, after a 20-min training session. For each group, we calculated IOA (kappa statistic, κ) of EUS-E and the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-E for pancreatic malignancy, by comparing the pattern of EUS-E indicative of malignancy (heterogeneous or homogenous blue) with the final diagnosis. RESULTS: The overall IOA was moderate (κ = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.52). The IOA of Group A (κ = 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-1.00) was significantly higher than that of Groups B (κ = 0.54; 95%CI 0.40-0.71), C (κ = 0.54; 95%CI 0.39-0.68), and D (κ = 0.28; 95%CI 0.14-0.40). IOA of Groups B and C was not significantly different, but it was significantly higher than that of Group D. The diagnostic accuracy of Group A (area under the curve under summary receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) = 0.83; 95%CI 0.75-0.90) was not significantly different from that of Group B (AUROC = 0.77; 95%CI 0.71-0.83), but it was significantly higher than that of Groups C (AUROC = 0.74; 95%CI 0.67-0.81) and D (AUROC = 0.74; 95%CI 0.67-0.81). No significant difference was seen between Groups B, C, and D for diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: EUS-E is reproducible in the evaluation of SPL, even between endoscopists with no or limited experience in EUS and/or EUS-E. Reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy increase with experience in EUS and EUS-E. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4568638/ /pubmed/26374584 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.163016 Text en Copyright: © Endoscopic Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Soares, João-Bruno
Iglesias-Garcia, Julio
Gonçalves, Bruno
Lindkvist, Björn
Lariño-Noia, Jose
Bastos, Pedro
Caetano, Ana Célia
Ferreira, Aníbal
Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro
Lopes, Luís
Moutinho-Ribeiro, Pedro
Dominguez-Muñoz, J. Enrique
Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions
title Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions
title_full Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions
title_fullStr Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions
title_short Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions
title_sort interobserver agreement of eus elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4568638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374584
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.163016
work_keys_str_mv AT soaresjoaobruno interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT iglesiasgarciajulio interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT goncalvesbruno interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT lindkvistbjorn interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT larinonoiajose interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT bastospedro interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT caetanoanacelia interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT ferreiraanibal interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT pimentelnunespedro interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT lopesluis interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT moutinhoribeiropedro interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT dominguezmunozjenrique interobserveragreementofeuselastographyintheevaluationofsolidpancreaticlesions