Cargando…

Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom promotion for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria. DESIGN: Mathematical and cost modelling. METHODS: A deterministic model of HIV-1 transmission within a cohort of ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchell, Kate M., Lépine, Aurélia, Terris-Prestholt, Fern, Torpey, Kwasi, Khamofu, Hadiza, Folayan, Morenike O., Musa, Jonah, Anenih, James, Sagay, Atiene S., Alhassan, Emmanuel, Idoko, John, Vickerman, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4568890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000798
_version_ 1782389962690265088
author Mitchell, Kate M.
Lépine, Aurélia
Terris-Prestholt, Fern
Torpey, Kwasi
Khamofu, Hadiza
Folayan, Morenike O.
Musa, Jonah
Anenih, James
Sagay, Atiene S.
Alhassan, Emmanuel
Idoko, John
Vickerman, Peter
author_facet Mitchell, Kate M.
Lépine, Aurélia
Terris-Prestholt, Fern
Torpey, Kwasi
Khamofu, Hadiza
Folayan, Morenike O.
Musa, Jonah
Anenih, James
Sagay, Atiene S.
Alhassan, Emmanuel
Idoko, John
Vickerman, Peter
author_sort Mitchell, Kate M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom promotion for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria. DESIGN: Mathematical and cost modelling. METHODS: A deterministic model of HIV-1 transmission within a cohort of serodiscordant couples and to/from external partners was parameterized using data from Nigeria and other African settings. The impact and cost-effectiveness were estimated for condom promotion, PrEP and/or TasP, compared with a baseline where antiretroviral therapy (ART) was offered according to 2010 national guidelines (CD4(+) <350 cells/μl) to all HIV-positive partners. The impact was additionally compared with a baseline of current ART coverage (35% of those with CD4(+) <350 cells/μl). Full costs (in US $2012) of programme introduction and implementation were estimated from a provider perspective. RESULTS: Substantial benefits came from scaling up ART to all HIV-positive partners according to 2010 national guidelines, with additional smaller benefits of providing TasP, PrEP or condom promotion. Compared with a baseline of offering ART to all HIV-positive partners at the 2010 national guidelines, condom promotion was the most cost-effective strategy [US $1206/disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY)], the next most cost-effective intervention was to additionally give TasP to HIV-positive partners (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio US $1607/DALY), followed by additionally giving PrEP to HIV-negative partners until their HIV-positive partners initiate ART (US $7870/DALY). When impact was measured in terms of infections averted, PrEP with condom promotion prevented double the number of infections as condom promotion alone. CONCLUSIONS: The first priority intervention for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria should be scaled up ART access for HIV-positive partners. Subsequent incremental benefits are greatest with condom promotion and TasP, followed by PrEP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4568890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45688902015-09-30 Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria Mitchell, Kate M. Lépine, Aurélia Terris-Prestholt, Fern Torpey, Kwasi Khamofu, Hadiza Folayan, Morenike O. Musa, Jonah Anenih, James Sagay, Atiene S. Alhassan, Emmanuel Idoko, John Vickerman, Peter AIDS Epidemiology and Social OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom promotion for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria. DESIGN: Mathematical and cost modelling. METHODS: A deterministic model of HIV-1 transmission within a cohort of serodiscordant couples and to/from external partners was parameterized using data from Nigeria and other African settings. The impact and cost-effectiveness were estimated for condom promotion, PrEP and/or TasP, compared with a baseline where antiretroviral therapy (ART) was offered according to 2010 national guidelines (CD4(+) <350 cells/μl) to all HIV-positive partners. The impact was additionally compared with a baseline of current ART coverage (35% of those with CD4(+) <350 cells/μl). Full costs (in US $2012) of programme introduction and implementation were estimated from a provider perspective. RESULTS: Substantial benefits came from scaling up ART to all HIV-positive partners according to 2010 national guidelines, with additional smaller benefits of providing TasP, PrEP or condom promotion. Compared with a baseline of offering ART to all HIV-positive partners at the 2010 national guidelines, condom promotion was the most cost-effective strategy [US $1206/disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY)], the next most cost-effective intervention was to additionally give TasP to HIV-positive partners (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio US $1607/DALY), followed by additionally giving PrEP to HIV-negative partners until their HIV-positive partners initiate ART (US $7870/DALY). When impact was measured in terms of infections averted, PrEP with condom promotion prevented double the number of infections as condom promotion alone. CONCLUSIONS: The first priority intervention for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria should be scaled up ART access for HIV-positive partners. Subsequent incremental benefits are greatest with condom promotion and TasP, followed by PrEP. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-09-24 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4568890/ /pubmed/26355574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000798 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Epidemiology and Social
Mitchell, Kate M.
Lépine, Aurélia
Terris-Prestholt, Fern
Torpey, Kwasi
Khamofu, Hadiza
Folayan, Morenike O.
Musa, Jonah
Anenih, James
Sagay, Atiene S.
Alhassan, Emmanuel
Idoko, John
Vickerman, Peter
Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria
title Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria
title_full Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria
title_fullStr Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria
title_short Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria
title_sort modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst hiv serodiscordant couples in nigeria
topic Epidemiology and Social
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4568890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000798
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellkatem modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT lepineaurelia modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT terrisprestholtfern modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT torpeykwasi modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT khamofuhadiza modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT folayanmorenikeo modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT musajonah modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT anenihjames modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT sagayatienes modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT alhassanemmanuel modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT idokojohn modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria
AT vickermanpeter modellingtheimpactandcosteffectivenessofcombinationpreventionamongsthivserodiscordantcouplesinnigeria