Cargando…

Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources

The future is uncertain because some forthcoming events are unpredictable and also because our ability to foresee the myriad consequences of our own actions is limited. Here we studied how humans select actions under such extrinsic and intrinsic uncertainty, in view of an exponentially expanding num...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snider, Joseph, Lee, Dongpyo, Poizner, Howard, Gepshtein, Sergei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26367309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004501
_version_ 1782390015091802112
author Snider, Joseph
Lee, Dongpyo
Poizner, Howard
Gepshtein, Sergei
author_facet Snider, Joseph
Lee, Dongpyo
Poizner, Howard
Gepshtein, Sergei
author_sort Snider, Joseph
collection PubMed
description The future is uncertain because some forthcoming events are unpredictable and also because our ability to foresee the myriad consequences of our own actions is limited. Here we studied how humans select actions under such extrinsic and intrinsic uncertainty, in view of an exponentially expanding number of prospects on a branching multivalued visual stimulus. A triangular grid of disks of different sizes scrolled down a touchscreen at a variable speed. The larger disks represented larger rewards. The task was to maximize the cumulative reward by touching one disk at a time in a rapid sequence, forming an upward path across the grid, while every step along the path constrained the part of the grid accessible in the future. This task captured some of the complexity of natural behavior in the risky and dynamic world, where ongoing decisions alter the landscape of future rewards. By comparing human behavior with behavior of ideal actors, we identified the strategies used by humans in terms of how far into the future they looked (their “depth of computation”) and how often they attempted to incorporate new information about the future rewards (their “recalculation period”). We found that, for a given task difficulty, humans traded off their depth of computation for the recalculation period. The form of this tradeoff was consistent with a complete, brute-force exploration of all possible paths up to a resource-limited finite depth. A step-by-step analysis of the human behavior revealed that participants took into account very fine distinctions between the future rewards and that they abstained from some simple heuristics in assessment of the alternative paths, such as seeking only the largest disks or avoiding the smaller disks. The participants preferred to reduce their depth of computation or increase the recalculation period rather than sacrifice the precision of computation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4569291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45692912015-09-18 Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources Snider, Joseph Lee, Dongpyo Poizner, Howard Gepshtein, Sergei PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The future is uncertain because some forthcoming events are unpredictable and also because our ability to foresee the myriad consequences of our own actions is limited. Here we studied how humans select actions under such extrinsic and intrinsic uncertainty, in view of an exponentially expanding number of prospects on a branching multivalued visual stimulus. A triangular grid of disks of different sizes scrolled down a touchscreen at a variable speed. The larger disks represented larger rewards. The task was to maximize the cumulative reward by touching one disk at a time in a rapid sequence, forming an upward path across the grid, while every step along the path constrained the part of the grid accessible in the future. This task captured some of the complexity of natural behavior in the risky and dynamic world, where ongoing decisions alter the landscape of future rewards. By comparing human behavior with behavior of ideal actors, we identified the strategies used by humans in terms of how far into the future they looked (their “depth of computation”) and how often they attempted to incorporate new information about the future rewards (their “recalculation period”). We found that, for a given task difficulty, humans traded off their depth of computation for the recalculation period. The form of this tradeoff was consistent with a complete, brute-force exploration of all possible paths up to a resource-limited finite depth. A step-by-step analysis of the human behavior revealed that participants took into account very fine distinctions between the future rewards and that they abstained from some simple heuristics in assessment of the alternative paths, such as seeking only the largest disks or avoiding the smaller disks. The participants preferred to reduce their depth of computation or increase the recalculation period rather than sacrifice the precision of computation. Public Library of Science 2015-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4569291/ /pubmed/26367309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004501 Text en © 2015 Snider et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Snider, Joseph
Lee, Dongpyo
Poizner, Howard
Gepshtein, Sergei
Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources
title Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources
title_full Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources
title_fullStr Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources
title_short Prospective Optimization with Limited Resources
title_sort prospective optimization with limited resources
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26367309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004501
work_keys_str_mv AT sniderjoseph prospectiveoptimizationwithlimitedresources
AT leedongpyo prospectiveoptimizationwithlimitedresources
AT poiznerhoward prospectiveoptimizationwithlimitedresources
AT gepshteinsergei prospectiveoptimizationwithlimitedresources