Cargando…
Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews
OBJECTIVES: To assess discrepancies in the analyzed outcomes between protocols and published reviews within Cochrane oral health systematic reviews (COHG) on the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: All COHG systematic reviews on the CDSR and the corresponding pr...
Autores principales: | Pandis, Nikolaos, Fleming, Padhraig S., Worthington, Helen, Dwan, Kerry, Salanti, Georgia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26368938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137667 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?
por: Fleming, Padhraig S., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?
por: Koletsi, Despina, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?
por: Fleming, Padhraig S., et al.
Publicado: (2014)