Cargando…

Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners

Monaural rate discrimination and binaural interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination were studied as functions of pulse rate in a group of bilaterally implanted cochlear implant users. Stimuli for the rate discrimination task were pulse trains presented to one electrode, which could be in the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ihlefeld, Antje, Carlyon, Robert P., Kan, Alan, Churchill, Tyler H., Litovsky, Ruth Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26105749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0527-7
_version_ 1782390068855439360
author Ihlefeld, Antje
Carlyon, Robert P.
Kan, Alan
Churchill, Tyler H.
Litovsky, Ruth Y.
author_facet Ihlefeld, Antje
Carlyon, Robert P.
Kan, Alan
Churchill, Tyler H.
Litovsky, Ruth Y.
author_sort Ihlefeld, Antje
collection PubMed
description Monaural rate discrimination and binaural interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination were studied as functions of pulse rate in a group of bilaterally implanted cochlear implant users. Stimuli for the rate discrimination task were pulse trains presented to one electrode, which could be in the apical, middle, or basal part of the array, and in either the left or the right ear. In each two-interval trial, the standard stimulus had a rate of 100, 200, 300, or 500 pulses per second and the signal stimulus had a rate 35 % higher. ITD discrimination between pitch-matched electrode pairs was measured for the same standard rates as in the rate discrimination task and with an ITD of +/− 500 μs. Sensitivity (d′) on both tasks decreased with increasing rate, as has been reported previously. This study tested the hypothesis that deterioration in performance at high rates occurs for the two tasks due to a common neural basis, specific to the stimulation of each electrode. Results show that ITD scores for different pairs of electrodes correlated with the lower rate discrimination scores for those two electrodes. Statistical analysis, which partialed out overall differences between listeners, electrodes, and rates, supports the hypothesis that monaural and binaural temporal processing limitations are at least partly due to a common mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4569611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45696112015-09-17 Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners Ihlefeld, Antje Carlyon, Robert P. Kan, Alan Churchill, Tyler H. Litovsky, Ruth Y. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article Monaural rate discrimination and binaural interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination were studied as functions of pulse rate in a group of bilaterally implanted cochlear implant users. Stimuli for the rate discrimination task were pulse trains presented to one electrode, which could be in the apical, middle, or basal part of the array, and in either the left or the right ear. In each two-interval trial, the standard stimulus had a rate of 100, 200, 300, or 500 pulses per second and the signal stimulus had a rate 35 % higher. ITD discrimination between pitch-matched electrode pairs was measured for the same standard rates as in the rate discrimination task and with an ITD of +/− 500 μs. Sensitivity (d′) on both tasks decreased with increasing rate, as has been reported previously. This study tested the hypothesis that deterioration in performance at high rates occurs for the two tasks due to a common neural basis, specific to the stimulation of each electrode. Results show that ITD scores for different pairs of electrodes correlated with the lower rate discrimination scores for those two electrodes. Statistical analysis, which partialed out overall differences between listeners, electrodes, and rates, supports the hypothesis that monaural and binaural temporal processing limitations are at least partly due to a common mechanism. Springer US 2015-06-24 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4569611/ /pubmed/26105749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0527-7 Text en © Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ihlefeld, Antje
Carlyon, Robert P.
Kan, Alan
Churchill, Tyler H.
Litovsky, Ruth Y.
Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners
title Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_full Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_fullStr Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_full_unstemmed Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_short Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners
title_sort limitations on monaural and binaural temporal processing in bilateral cochlear implant listeners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26105749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0527-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ihlefeldantje limitationsonmonauralandbinauraltemporalprocessinginbilateralcochlearimplantlisteners
AT carlyonrobertp limitationsonmonauralandbinauraltemporalprocessinginbilateralcochlearimplantlisteners
AT kanalan limitationsonmonauralandbinauraltemporalprocessinginbilateralcochlearimplantlisteners
AT churchilltylerh limitationsonmonauralandbinauraltemporalprocessinginbilateralcochlearimplantlisteners
AT litovskyruthy limitationsonmonauralandbinauraltemporalprocessinginbilateralcochlearimplantlisteners