Cargando…
The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013
The second round of the community-wide initiative Critical Assessment of automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR (CASD-NMR-2013) comprised ten blind target datasets, consisting of unprocessed spectral data, assigned chemical shift lists and unassigned NOESY peak and RDC lists, that were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26071966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-015-9953-4 |
_version_ | 1782390079191252992 |
---|---|
author | Rosato, Antonio Vranken, Wim Fogh, Rasmus H. Ragan, Timothy J. Tejero, Roberto Pederson, Kari Lee, Hsiau-Wei Prestegard, James H. Yee, Adelinda Wu, Bin Lemak, Alexander Houliston, Scott Arrowsmith, Cheryl H. Kennedy, Michael Acton, Thomas B. Xiao, Rong Liu, Gaohua Montelione, Gaetano T. Vuister, Geerten W. |
author_facet | Rosato, Antonio Vranken, Wim Fogh, Rasmus H. Ragan, Timothy J. Tejero, Roberto Pederson, Kari Lee, Hsiau-Wei Prestegard, James H. Yee, Adelinda Wu, Bin Lemak, Alexander Houliston, Scott Arrowsmith, Cheryl H. Kennedy, Michael Acton, Thomas B. Xiao, Rong Liu, Gaohua Montelione, Gaetano T. Vuister, Geerten W. |
author_sort | Rosato, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The second round of the community-wide initiative Critical Assessment of automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR (CASD-NMR-2013) comprised ten blind target datasets, consisting of unprocessed spectral data, assigned chemical shift lists and unassigned NOESY peak and RDC lists, that were made available in both curated (i.e. manually refined) or un-curated (i.e. automatically generated) form. Ten structure calculation programs, using fully automated protocols only, generated a total of 164 three-dimensional structures (entries) for the ten targets, sometimes using both curated and un-curated lists to generate multiple entries for a single target. The accuracy of the entries could be established by comparing them to the corresponding manually solved structure of each target, which was not available at the time the data were provided. Across the entire data set, 71 % of all entries submitted achieved an accuracy relative to the reference NMR structure better than 1.5 Å. Methods based on NOESY peak lists achieved even better results with up to 100 % of the entries within the 1.5 Å threshold for some programs. However, some methods did not converge for some targets using un-curated NOESY peak lists. Over 90 % of the entries achieved an accuracy better than the more relaxed threshold of 2.5 Å that was used in the previous CASD-NMR-2010 round. Comparisons between entries generated with un-curated versus curated peaks show only marginal improvements for the latter in those cases where both calculations converged. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10858-015-9953-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4569658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45696582015-09-18 The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013 Rosato, Antonio Vranken, Wim Fogh, Rasmus H. Ragan, Timothy J. Tejero, Roberto Pederson, Kari Lee, Hsiau-Wei Prestegard, James H. Yee, Adelinda Wu, Bin Lemak, Alexander Houliston, Scott Arrowsmith, Cheryl H. Kennedy, Michael Acton, Thomas B. Xiao, Rong Liu, Gaohua Montelione, Gaetano T. Vuister, Geerten W. J Biomol NMR Article The second round of the community-wide initiative Critical Assessment of automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR (CASD-NMR-2013) comprised ten blind target datasets, consisting of unprocessed spectral data, assigned chemical shift lists and unassigned NOESY peak and RDC lists, that were made available in both curated (i.e. manually refined) or un-curated (i.e. automatically generated) form. Ten structure calculation programs, using fully automated protocols only, generated a total of 164 three-dimensional structures (entries) for the ten targets, sometimes using both curated and un-curated lists to generate multiple entries for a single target. The accuracy of the entries could be established by comparing them to the corresponding manually solved structure of each target, which was not available at the time the data were provided. Across the entire data set, 71 % of all entries submitted achieved an accuracy relative to the reference NMR structure better than 1.5 Å. Methods based on NOESY peak lists achieved even better results with up to 100 % of the entries within the 1.5 Å threshold for some programs. However, some methods did not converge for some targets using un-curated NOESY peak lists. Over 90 % of the entries achieved an accuracy better than the more relaxed threshold of 2.5 Å that was used in the previous CASD-NMR-2010 round. Comparisons between entries generated with un-curated versus curated peaks show only marginal improvements for the latter in those cases where both calculations converged. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10858-015-9953-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2015-06-14 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4569658/ /pubmed/26071966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-015-9953-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Rosato, Antonio Vranken, Wim Fogh, Rasmus H. Ragan, Timothy J. Tejero, Roberto Pederson, Kari Lee, Hsiau-Wei Prestegard, James H. Yee, Adelinda Wu, Bin Lemak, Alexander Houliston, Scott Arrowsmith, Cheryl H. Kennedy, Michael Acton, Thomas B. Xiao, Rong Liu, Gaohua Montelione, Gaetano T. Vuister, Geerten W. The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013 |
title | The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013 |
title_full | The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013 |
title_fullStr | The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013 |
title_full_unstemmed | The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013 |
title_short | The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013 |
title_sort | second round of critical assessment of automated structure determination of proteins by nmr: casd-nmr-2013 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26071966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10858-015-9953-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosatoantonio thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT vrankenwim thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT foghrasmush thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT ragantimothyj thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT tejeroroberto thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT pedersonkari thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT leehsiauwei thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT prestegardjamesh thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT yeeadelinda thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT wubin thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT lemakalexander thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT houlistonscott thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT arrowsmithcherylh thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT kennedymichael thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT actonthomasb thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT xiaorong thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT liugaohua thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT montelionegaetanot thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT vuistergeertenw thesecondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT rosatoantonio secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT vrankenwim secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT foghrasmush secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT ragantimothyj secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT tejeroroberto secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT pedersonkari secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT leehsiauwei secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT prestegardjamesh secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT yeeadelinda secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT wubin secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT lemakalexander secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT houlistonscott secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT arrowsmithcherylh secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT kennedymichael secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT actonthomasb secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT xiaorong secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT liugaohua secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT montelionegaetanot secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 AT vuistergeertenw secondroundofcriticalassessmentofautomatedstructuredeterminationofproteinsbynmrcasdnmr2013 |