Cargando…

Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION: Biological meshes are a potential alternative to the synthetic meshes to avoid complications and are used in a contaminated field for incarcerated inguinal hernias. The clinical experiences gained with biological meshes for repair of inguinal hernias are presented in this review. MATER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köckerling, Ferdinand, Alam, Nasra N., Narang, Sunil K., Daniels, Ian R., Smart, Neil J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00048
_version_ 1782390107048771584
author Köckerling, Ferdinand
Alam, Nasra N.
Narang, Sunil K.
Daniels, Ian R.
Smart, Neil J.
author_facet Köckerling, Ferdinand
Alam, Nasra N.
Narang, Sunil K.
Daniels, Ian R.
Smart, Neil J.
author_sort Köckerling, Ferdinand
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Biological meshes are a potential alternative to the synthetic meshes to avoid complications and are used in a contaminated field for incarcerated inguinal hernias. The clinical experiences gained with biological meshes for repair of inguinal hernias are presented in this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a literature search of the Medline database using the key word “Biological mesh,” 2,277 citations were found. There remained 14 studies in which biological meshes had been used to repair inguinal hernias. RESULTS: In prospective randomized trials, the use of polypropylene vs. biological meshes was compared in open inguinal hernia repair. There was no difference in the recurrence rate, but differences were observed in the postsurgical pain incidence in favor of the biological mesh. In the remaining retrospective studies, the recurrence rates were also acceptable. The biological mesh was used successfully in a potentially contaminated setting. CONCLUSION: Inguinal hernias can be repaired with biological meshes with reasonable recurrence rate, also as an alternative in a potentially contaminated field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4569804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45698042015-10-05 Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature Köckerling, Ferdinand Alam, Nasra N. Narang, Sunil K. Daniels, Ian R. Smart, Neil J. Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: Biological meshes are a potential alternative to the synthetic meshes to avoid complications and are used in a contaminated field for incarcerated inguinal hernias. The clinical experiences gained with biological meshes for repair of inguinal hernias are presented in this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a literature search of the Medline database using the key word “Biological mesh,” 2,277 citations were found. There remained 14 studies in which biological meshes had been used to repair inguinal hernias. RESULTS: In prospective randomized trials, the use of polypropylene vs. biological meshes was compared in open inguinal hernia repair. There was no difference in the recurrence rate, but differences were observed in the postsurgical pain incidence in favor of the biological mesh. In the remaining retrospective studies, the recurrence rates were also acceptable. The biological mesh was used successfully in a potentially contaminated setting. CONCLUSION: Inguinal hernias can be repaired with biological meshes with reasonable recurrence rate, also as an alternative in a potentially contaminated field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4569804/ /pubmed/26442279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00048 Text en Copyright © 2015 Köckerling, Alam, Narang, Daniels and Smart. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Köckerling, Ferdinand
Alam, Nasra N.
Narang, Sunil K.
Daniels, Ian R.
Smart, Neil J.
Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature
title Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature
title_full Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature
title_short Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature
title_sort biological meshes for inguinal hernia repair – review of the literature
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00048
work_keys_str_mv AT kockerlingferdinand biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature
AT alamnasran biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature
AT narangsunilk biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature
AT danielsianr biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature
AT smartneilj biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature