Cargando…
Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature
INTRODUCTION: Biological meshes are a potential alternative to the synthetic meshes to avoid complications and are used in a contaminated field for incarcerated inguinal hernias. The clinical experiences gained with biological meshes for repair of inguinal hernias are presented in this review. MATER...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00048 |
_version_ | 1782390107048771584 |
---|---|
author | Köckerling, Ferdinand Alam, Nasra N. Narang, Sunil K. Daniels, Ian R. Smart, Neil J. |
author_facet | Köckerling, Ferdinand Alam, Nasra N. Narang, Sunil K. Daniels, Ian R. Smart, Neil J. |
author_sort | Köckerling, Ferdinand |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Biological meshes are a potential alternative to the synthetic meshes to avoid complications and are used in a contaminated field for incarcerated inguinal hernias. The clinical experiences gained with biological meshes for repair of inguinal hernias are presented in this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a literature search of the Medline database using the key word “Biological mesh,” 2,277 citations were found. There remained 14 studies in which biological meshes had been used to repair inguinal hernias. RESULTS: In prospective randomized trials, the use of polypropylene vs. biological meshes was compared in open inguinal hernia repair. There was no difference in the recurrence rate, but differences were observed in the postsurgical pain incidence in favor of the biological mesh. In the remaining retrospective studies, the recurrence rates were also acceptable. The biological mesh was used successfully in a potentially contaminated setting. CONCLUSION: Inguinal hernias can be repaired with biological meshes with reasonable recurrence rate, also as an alternative in a potentially contaminated field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4569804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45698042015-10-05 Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature Köckerling, Ferdinand Alam, Nasra N. Narang, Sunil K. Daniels, Ian R. Smart, Neil J. Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: Biological meshes are a potential alternative to the synthetic meshes to avoid complications and are used in a contaminated field for incarcerated inguinal hernias. The clinical experiences gained with biological meshes for repair of inguinal hernias are presented in this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a literature search of the Medline database using the key word “Biological mesh,” 2,277 citations were found. There remained 14 studies in which biological meshes had been used to repair inguinal hernias. RESULTS: In prospective randomized trials, the use of polypropylene vs. biological meshes was compared in open inguinal hernia repair. There was no difference in the recurrence rate, but differences were observed in the postsurgical pain incidence in favor of the biological mesh. In the remaining retrospective studies, the recurrence rates were also acceptable. The biological mesh was used successfully in a potentially contaminated setting. CONCLUSION: Inguinal hernias can be repaired with biological meshes with reasonable recurrence rate, also as an alternative in a potentially contaminated field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4569804/ /pubmed/26442279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00048 Text en Copyright © 2015 Köckerling, Alam, Narang, Daniels and Smart. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Köckerling, Ferdinand Alam, Nasra N. Narang, Sunil K. Daniels, Ian R. Smart, Neil J. Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature |
title | Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature |
title_full | Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature |
title_short | Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair – Review of the Literature |
title_sort | biological meshes for inguinal hernia repair – review of the literature |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kockerlingferdinand biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature AT alamnasran biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature AT narangsunilk biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature AT danielsianr biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature AT smartneilj biologicalmeshesforinguinalherniarepairreviewoftheliterature |