Cargando…

Feedback is the best way to see

A 60-year-old man with past history of acute mild pancreatitis (AP) in 1997 and 2005, recently with repeated attacks of AP 5 times in last 2 years. Repeated endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed 20 mm cyst in pancreatic body with 5 mm nodule, main pancreatic duct (MPD) 4-6 mm, fine-needle aspirati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bunganic, B., Laclav, M., Zaruba, P., Belina, F., Ryska, M., Zavoral, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425512
_version_ 1782390126688600064
author Bunganic, B.
Laclav, M.
Zaruba, P.
Belina, F.
Ryska, M.
Zavoral, M.
author_facet Bunganic, B.
Laclav, M.
Zaruba, P.
Belina, F.
Ryska, M.
Zavoral, M.
author_sort Bunganic, B.
collection PubMed
description A 60-year-old man with past history of acute mild pancreatitis (AP) in 1997 and 2005, recently with repeated attacks of AP 5 times in last 2 years. Repeated endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed 20 mm cyst in pancreatic body with 5 mm nodule, main pancreatic duct (MPD) 4-6 mm, fine-needle aspiration malignant cell negative, mucin positive. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of branch duct intraductal papillary mucosal neoplasms with 10 mm branch duct. From 2011 to 2013, the cyst was without progression in size or character. Due to clinical course of repeated AP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was recommended. It revealed dilated MPD 5-7 mm and 15 mm × 13 mm cyst in pancreatic body. Distal pancreatectomy was indicated because of clinical course and “worrisome EUS features” — MPD size and intramural nodule. In terms of having feedback, endosonographer use to examine every resected specimen of pancreas in our hospital just after surgery. The resected body with “sand glass” appearance of the cyst of size 3 cm was totally different from what we saw previously. We rewinded the previous EUS documentation and made a new evaluation. EUS is unique method for pancreatic tumors, but only in combination with real image of specimen makes endosonographer to bow up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4569910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45699102015-09-30 Feedback is the best way to see Bunganic, B. Laclav, M. Zaruba, P. Belina, F. Ryska, M. Zavoral, M. Endosc Ultrasound EURO EUS Meeting A 60-year-old man with past history of acute mild pancreatitis (AP) in 1997 and 2005, recently with repeated attacks of AP 5 times in last 2 years. Repeated endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed 20 mm cyst in pancreatic body with 5 mm nodule, main pancreatic duct (MPD) 4-6 mm, fine-needle aspiration malignant cell negative, mucin positive. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of branch duct intraductal papillary mucosal neoplasms with 10 mm branch duct. From 2011 to 2013, the cyst was without progression in size or character. Due to clinical course of repeated AP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was recommended. It revealed dilated MPD 5-7 mm and 15 mm × 13 mm cyst in pancreatic body. Distal pancreatectomy was indicated because of clinical course and “worrisome EUS features” — MPD size and intramural nodule. In terms of having feedback, endosonographer use to examine every resected specimen of pancreas in our hospital just after surgery. The resected body with “sand glass” appearance of the cyst of size 3 cm was totally different from what we saw previously. We rewinded the previous EUS documentation and made a new evaluation. EUS is unique method for pancreatic tumors, but only in combination with real image of specimen makes endosonographer to bow up. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4569910/ /pubmed/26425512 Text en Copyright: © Endoscopic Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle EURO EUS Meeting
Bunganic, B.
Laclav, M.
Zaruba, P.
Belina, F.
Ryska, M.
Zavoral, M.
Feedback is the best way to see
title Feedback is the best way to see
title_full Feedback is the best way to see
title_fullStr Feedback is the best way to see
title_full_unstemmed Feedback is the best way to see
title_short Feedback is the best way to see
title_sort feedback is the best way to see
topic EURO EUS Meeting
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425512
work_keys_str_mv AT bunganicb feedbackisthebestwaytosee
AT laclavm feedbackisthebestwaytosee
AT zarubap feedbackisthebestwaytosee
AT belinaf feedbackisthebestwaytosee
AT ryskam feedbackisthebestwaytosee
AT zavoralm feedbackisthebestwaytosee