Cargando…
Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration
INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive and safe method for material procurement in the differential diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SEL) of upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT), especially in suspicious lesions of gastroi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425517 |
_version_ | 1782390127824207872 |
---|---|
author | Assef, M. Rossini, L. Neto, G. Silva Nakao, F. Sayeg, M. Araki, O. |
author_facet | Assef, M. Rossini, L. Neto, G. Silva Nakao, F. Sayeg, M. Araki, O. |
author_sort | Assef, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive and safe method for material procurement in the differential diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SEL) of upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT), especially in suspicious lesions of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). There are few studies discussing the factors that influence the EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of SEL. AIM: To establish possible associations between lesion size, layer and organ of origin with the outcome of EUS-FNA in patients with SELs of UGT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using data of patients referred to French-Brazilian Center of EUS of endoscopy Department of Santa Casa de São Paulo Hospital, with previous endoscopic diagnosis of SEL, which underwent EUS-FNA from May 2006 to August 2011. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were submitted to EUS. 15 with extrinsic compressions and 207 with SEL. Of these, 89 underwent to EUS-FNA. Ninety-two SEL were diagnosed on EUS and punctured. The EUS-FNA was positive in 58.7%. In lesions measuring 2-3 cm and >3 cm, the EUS-FNA was positive in 80% and 72%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The size of SELs was the only variable that influenced the outcome of EUS-FNA. Best results are achieved in lesions larger than 2 cm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4569915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45699152015-09-30 Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration Assef, M. Rossini, L. Neto, G. Silva Nakao, F. Sayeg, M. Araki, O. Endosc Ultrasound EURO EUS Meeting INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive and safe method for material procurement in the differential diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SEL) of upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT), especially in suspicious lesions of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). There are few studies discussing the factors that influence the EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of SEL. AIM: To establish possible associations between lesion size, layer and organ of origin with the outcome of EUS-FNA in patients with SELs of UGT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using data of patients referred to French-Brazilian Center of EUS of endoscopy Department of Santa Casa de São Paulo Hospital, with previous endoscopic diagnosis of SEL, which underwent EUS-FNA from May 2006 to August 2011. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were submitted to EUS. 15 with extrinsic compressions and 207 with SEL. Of these, 89 underwent to EUS-FNA. Ninety-two SEL were diagnosed on EUS and punctured. The EUS-FNA was positive in 58.7%. In lesions measuring 2-3 cm and >3 cm, the EUS-FNA was positive in 80% and 72%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The size of SELs was the only variable that influenced the outcome of EUS-FNA. Best results are achieved in lesions larger than 2 cm. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4569915/ /pubmed/26425517 Text en Copyright: © Endoscopic Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | EURO EUS Meeting Assef, M. Rossini, L. Neto, G. Silva Nakao, F. Sayeg, M. Araki, O. Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration |
title | Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration |
title_full | Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration |
title_fullStr | Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration |
title_short | Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration |
title_sort | influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration |
topic | EURO EUS Meeting |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4569915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assefm influenceoflayersizeandorganofsubepitheliallesionsofuppergastrointestinaltractinoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspiration AT rossinil influenceoflayersizeandorganofsubepitheliallesionsofuppergastrointestinaltractinoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspiration AT netogsilva influenceoflayersizeandorganofsubepitheliallesionsofuppergastrointestinaltractinoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspiration AT nakaof influenceoflayersizeandorganofsubepitheliallesionsofuppergastrointestinaltractinoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspiration AT sayegm influenceoflayersizeandorganofsubepitheliallesionsofuppergastrointestinaltractinoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspiration AT arakio influenceoflayersizeandorganofsubepitheliallesionsofuppergastrointestinaltractinoutcomesofendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspiration |