Cargando…
Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases
An implant-supported hybrid prosthesis is an acrylic resin complete fixed dental prosthesis and supported by implants might be a solution in extreme cases that the need of the restoration for esthetics, function, lip support, and speech. This clinical report aims to present the esthetic and function...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.163324 |
_version_ | 1782390143736348672 |
---|---|
author | Egilmez, Ferhan Ergun, Gulfem Cekic-Nagas, Isil Bozkaya, Suleyman |
author_facet | Egilmez, Ferhan Ergun, Gulfem Cekic-Nagas, Isil Bozkaya, Suleyman |
author_sort | Egilmez, Ferhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | An implant-supported hybrid prosthesis is an acrylic resin complete fixed dental prosthesis and supported by implants might be a solution in extreme cases that the need of the restoration for esthetics, function, lip support, and speech. This clinical report aims to present the esthetic and functional prosthetic rehabilitation of three borderline cases with implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Patient 1 (62-year-old man) and Patient 2 (61-year-old man) presented a chief complaint of a compromised esthetic. After clinical evaluations, in Patient 1, 8 implants in the maxilla and 7 implants in mandibula were observed. Patient 2 had 7 implants in the maxilla and 7 implants in mandibula, which were previously placed. The intra-arch dimension of both patients was excessive and an insufficient peri-oral soft tissue support was observed. Patient 3 was a 61-year-old man had 2 implants with a history of previously implanted graft infection and implant loss on his maxillary posterior jaw. An excessive intra-arch dimension was observed in clinical examination. In addition, massive bone defect and insufficient soft tissue support were examined. In all patients, implant-supported hybrid prostheses were successfully performed. The clinical and radiologic findings were satisfactory. After 3 years of follow-up, no functional, phonetic, or esthetic problems with the restorations were noted. These case reports suggest that implant-supported hybrid prostheses can be a reliable alternative treatment procedure when a porcelain-fused metal fixed restoration does not satisfy a patient's requirements for esthetics, phonetics, oral hygiene, and oral comfort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4570001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45700012015-10-01 Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases Egilmez, Ferhan Ergun, Gulfem Cekic-Nagas, Isil Bozkaya, Suleyman Eur J Dent Case Report An implant-supported hybrid prosthesis is an acrylic resin complete fixed dental prosthesis and supported by implants might be a solution in extreme cases that the need of the restoration for esthetics, function, lip support, and speech. This clinical report aims to present the esthetic and functional prosthetic rehabilitation of three borderline cases with implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Patient 1 (62-year-old man) and Patient 2 (61-year-old man) presented a chief complaint of a compromised esthetic. After clinical evaluations, in Patient 1, 8 implants in the maxilla and 7 implants in mandibula were observed. Patient 2 had 7 implants in the maxilla and 7 implants in mandibula, which were previously placed. The intra-arch dimension of both patients was excessive and an insufficient peri-oral soft tissue support was observed. Patient 3 was a 61-year-old man had 2 implants with a history of previously implanted graft infection and implant loss on his maxillary posterior jaw. An excessive intra-arch dimension was observed in clinical examination. In addition, massive bone defect and insufficient soft tissue support were examined. In all patients, implant-supported hybrid prostheses were successfully performed. The clinical and radiologic findings were satisfactory. After 3 years of follow-up, no functional, phonetic, or esthetic problems with the restorations were noted. These case reports suggest that implant-supported hybrid prostheses can be a reliable alternative treatment procedure when a porcelain-fused metal fixed restoration does not satisfy a patient's requirements for esthetics, phonetics, oral hygiene, and oral comfort. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4570001/ /pubmed/26430378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.163324 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms |
spellingShingle | Case Report Egilmez, Ferhan Ergun, Gulfem Cekic-Nagas, Isil Bozkaya, Suleyman Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases |
title | Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases |
title_full | Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases |
title_fullStr | Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases |
title_short | Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: Conventional treatment method for borderline cases |
title_sort | implant-supported hybrid prosthesis: conventional treatment method for borderline cases |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430378 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.163324 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT egilmezferhan implantsupportedhybridprosthesisconventionaltreatmentmethodforborderlinecases AT ergungulfem implantsupportedhybridprosthesisconventionaltreatmentmethodforborderlinecases AT cekicnagasisil implantsupportedhybridprosthesisconventionaltreatmentmethodforborderlinecases AT bozkayasuleyman implantsupportedhybridprosthesisconventionaltreatmentmethodforborderlinecases |