Cargando…

Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices

While fortification of staple foods and condiments has gained enormous global traction, poor performance persists throughout many aspects of implementation, most notably around the critical element of regulatory monitoring, which is essential for ensuring foods meet national fortification standards....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luthringer, Corey L, Rowe, Laura A, Vossenaar, Marieke, Garrett, Greg S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374804
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00171
_version_ 1782390147399024640
author Luthringer, Corey L
Rowe, Laura A
Vossenaar, Marieke
Garrett, Greg S
author_facet Luthringer, Corey L
Rowe, Laura A
Vossenaar, Marieke
Garrett, Greg S
author_sort Luthringer, Corey L
collection PubMed
description While fortification of staple foods and condiments has gained enormous global traction, poor performance persists throughout many aspects of implementation, most notably around the critical element of regulatory monitoring, which is essential for ensuring foods meet national fortification standards. Where coverage of fortified foods is high, limited nutritional impact of fortification programs largely exists due to regulatory monitoring that insufficiently identifies and holds producers accountable for underfortified products. Based on quality assurance data from 20 national fortification programs in 12 countries, we estimate that less than half of the samples are adequately fortified against relevant national standards. In this paper, we outline key findings from a literature review, key informant interviews with 11 fortification experts, and semi-quantitative surveys with 39 individuals from regulatory agencies and the food fortification industry in 17 countries on the perceived effectiveness of regulatory monitoring systems and barriers to compliance against national fortification standards. Findings highlight that regulatory agencies and industry disagree on the value that enforcement mechanisms have in ensuring compliance against standards. Perceived political risk of enforcement and poorly resourced inspectorate capacity appear to adversely reinforce each other within an environment of unclear legislation to create a major hurdle for improving overall compliance of fortification programs against national standards. Budget constraints affect the ability of regulatory agencies to create a well-trained inspector cadre and improve the detection and enforcement of non-compliant and underfortified products. Recommendations to improve fortification compliance include improving technical capacity; ensuring sustained leadership, accountability, and funding in both the private and the public sectors; and removing political barriers to ensure consistent detection of underfortified products and enforcement of applicable fortification standards. Only by taking concrete steps to improve the entire regulatory system that is built on a cooperative working relationship between regulatory agencies and food producers will a nutrition strategy that uses fortification see its intended health effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4570017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45700172015-09-21 Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices Luthringer, Corey L Rowe, Laura A Vossenaar, Marieke Garrett, Greg S Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article While fortification of staple foods and condiments has gained enormous global traction, poor performance persists throughout many aspects of implementation, most notably around the critical element of regulatory monitoring, which is essential for ensuring foods meet national fortification standards. Where coverage of fortified foods is high, limited nutritional impact of fortification programs largely exists due to regulatory monitoring that insufficiently identifies and holds producers accountable for underfortified products. Based on quality assurance data from 20 national fortification programs in 12 countries, we estimate that less than half of the samples are adequately fortified against relevant national standards. In this paper, we outline key findings from a literature review, key informant interviews with 11 fortification experts, and semi-quantitative surveys with 39 individuals from regulatory agencies and the food fortification industry in 17 countries on the perceived effectiveness of regulatory monitoring systems and barriers to compliance against national fortification standards. Findings highlight that regulatory agencies and industry disagree on the value that enforcement mechanisms have in ensuring compliance against standards. Perceived political risk of enforcement and poorly resourced inspectorate capacity appear to adversely reinforce each other within an environment of unclear legislation to create a major hurdle for improving overall compliance of fortification programs against national standards. Budget constraints affect the ability of regulatory agencies to create a well-trained inspector cadre and improve the detection and enforcement of non-compliant and underfortified products. Recommendations to improve fortification compliance include improving technical capacity; ensuring sustained leadership, accountability, and funding in both the private and the public sectors; and removing political barriers to ensure consistent detection of underfortified products and enforcement of applicable fortification standards. Only by taking concrete steps to improve the entire regulatory system that is built on a cooperative working relationship between regulatory agencies and food producers will a nutrition strategy that uses fortification see its intended health effects. Global Health: Science and Practice 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4570017/ /pubmed/26374804 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00171 Text en © Luthringer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00171.
spellingShingle Original Article
Luthringer, Corey L
Rowe, Laura A
Vossenaar, Marieke
Garrett, Greg S
Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices
title Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices
title_full Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices
title_fullStr Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices
title_short Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices
title_sort regulatory monitoring of fortified foods: identifying barriers and good practices
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374804
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00171
work_keys_str_mv AT luthringercoreyl regulatorymonitoringoffortifiedfoodsidentifyingbarriersandgoodpractices
AT rowelauraa regulatorymonitoringoffortifiedfoodsidentifyingbarriersandgoodpractices
AT vossenaarmarieke regulatorymonitoringoffortifiedfoodsidentifyingbarriersandgoodpractices
AT garrettgregs regulatorymonitoringoffortifiedfoodsidentifyingbarriersandgoodpractices