Cargando…

Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations

Magneto-Inertial Measurement Unit sensors (MIMU) display high potential for the quantitative evaluation of upper limb kinematics, as they allow monitoring ambulatory measurements. The sensor-to-segment calibration step, consisting of establishing the relation between MIMU sensors and human segments,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouvier, Brice, Duprey, Sonia, Claudon, Laurent, Dumas, Raphaël, Savescu, Adriana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26263993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150818813
_version_ 1782390188891176960
author Bouvier, Brice
Duprey, Sonia
Claudon, Laurent
Dumas, Raphaël
Savescu, Adriana
author_facet Bouvier, Brice
Duprey, Sonia
Claudon, Laurent
Dumas, Raphaël
Savescu, Adriana
author_sort Bouvier, Brice
collection PubMed
description Magneto-Inertial Measurement Unit sensors (MIMU) display high potential for the quantitative evaluation of upper limb kinematics, as they allow monitoring ambulatory measurements. The sensor-to-segment calibration step, consisting of establishing the relation between MIMU sensors and human segments, plays an important role in the global accuracy of joint angles. The aim of this study was to compare sensor-to-segment calibrations for the MIMU-based estimation of wrist, elbow, and shoulder joint angles, by examining trueness (“close to the reference”) and precision (reproducibility) validity criteria. Ten subjects performed five sessions with three different operators. Three classes of calibrations were studied: segment axes equal to technical MIMU axes (TECH), segment axes generated during a static pose (STATIC), and those generated during functional movements (FUNCT). The calibrations were compared during the maximal uniaxial movements of each joint, plus an extra multi-joint movement. Generally, joint angles presented good trueness and very good precision in the range 5°–10°. Only small discrepancy between calibrations was highlighted, with the exception of a few cases. The very good overall accuracy (trueness and precision) of MIMU-based joint angle data seems to be more dependent on the level of rigor of the experimental procedure (operator training) than on the choice of calibration itself.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4570347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45703472015-09-17 Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations Bouvier, Brice Duprey, Sonia Claudon, Laurent Dumas, Raphaël Savescu, Adriana Sensors (Basel) Article Magneto-Inertial Measurement Unit sensors (MIMU) display high potential for the quantitative evaluation of upper limb kinematics, as they allow monitoring ambulatory measurements. The sensor-to-segment calibration step, consisting of establishing the relation between MIMU sensors and human segments, plays an important role in the global accuracy of joint angles. The aim of this study was to compare sensor-to-segment calibrations for the MIMU-based estimation of wrist, elbow, and shoulder joint angles, by examining trueness (“close to the reference”) and precision (reproducibility) validity criteria. Ten subjects performed five sessions with three different operators. Three classes of calibrations were studied: segment axes equal to technical MIMU axes (TECH), segment axes generated during a static pose (STATIC), and those generated during functional movements (FUNCT). The calibrations were compared during the maximal uniaxial movements of each joint, plus an extra multi-joint movement. Generally, joint angles presented good trueness and very good precision in the range 5°–10°. Only small discrepancy between calibrations was highlighted, with the exception of a few cases. The very good overall accuracy (trueness and precision) of MIMU-based joint angle data seems to be more dependent on the level of rigor of the experimental procedure (operator training) than on the choice of calibration itself. MDPI 2015-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4570347/ /pubmed/26263993 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150818813 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bouvier, Brice
Duprey, Sonia
Claudon, Laurent
Dumas, Raphaël
Savescu, Adriana
Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations
title Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations
title_full Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations
title_fullStr Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations
title_full_unstemmed Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations
title_short Upper Limb Kinematics Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensors: Comparison of Sensor-to-Segment Calibrations
title_sort upper limb kinematics using inertial and magnetic sensors: comparison of sensor-to-segment calibrations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26263993
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150818813
work_keys_str_mv AT bouvierbrice upperlimbkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensorscomparisonofsensortosegmentcalibrations
AT dupreysonia upperlimbkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensorscomparisonofsensortosegmentcalibrations
AT claudonlaurent upperlimbkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensorscomparisonofsensortosegmentcalibrations
AT dumasraphael upperlimbkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensorscomparisonofsensortosegmentcalibrations
AT savescuadriana upperlimbkinematicsusinginertialandmagneticsensorscomparisonofsensortosegmentcalibrations