Cargando…
The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) compared the safety and efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A prespecified spirometry substudy compared the lung function efficacy between trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4 |
_version_ | 1782390224600432640 |
---|---|
author | Anzueto, Antonio Wise, Robert Calverley, Peter Dusser, Daniel Tang, Wenbo Metzdorf, Norbert Dahl, Ronald |
author_facet | Anzueto, Antonio Wise, Robert Calverley, Peter Dusser, Daniel Tang, Wenbo Metzdorf, Norbert Dahl, Ronald |
author_sort | Anzueto, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) compared the safety and efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A prespecified spirometry substudy compared the lung function efficacy between treatment groups. METHODS: TIOSPIR® was a large-scale, long-term (2.3-year), event-driven, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of 17,135 patients with COPD. In the spirometry substudy, trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured at baseline and every 24 weeks for the duration of the trial. RESULTS: The substudy included 1370 patients who received once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (n = 461), 2.5 μg (n = 464), or tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg (n = 445). Adjusted mean trough FEV(1) (average 24–120 weeks) was 1.285, 1.258, and 1.295 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups (difference versus HandiHaler® [95 % CI]: −10 [−38, 18] mL for Respimat® 5 μg and, −37 [−65, −9] mL for Respimat® 2.5 μg); achieving noninferiority to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for tiotropium Respimat® 5 but not for 2.5 μg (prespecified analysis). Adjusted mean trough FVC was 2.590, 2.544, and 2.593 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups. The rates of FEV(1) decline over 24 to 120 weeks were similar for the three treatment arms (26, 40, and 34 mL/year for the tiotropium Respimat® 5-μg, 2.5-μg, and HandiHaler® 18-μg groups). The rate of FEV(1) decline in GOLD I + II patients was greater than in GOLD III + IV patients (46 vs. 23 mL/year); as well as in current versus ex-smokers, in patients receiving combination therapies at baseline versus not, and in those experiencing an exacerbation during the study versus not. CONCLUSIONS: The TIOSPIR® spirometry substudy showed that tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg was noninferior to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for trough FEV(1), but Respimat® 2.5 μg was not. Tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg provides similar bronchodilator efficacy to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg with comparable rates of FEV(1) decline. The rate of FEV(1) decline varied based on disease severity, with a steeper rate of decline observed in patients with moderate airway obstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01126437. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4570597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45705972015-09-16 The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes Anzueto, Antonio Wise, Robert Calverley, Peter Dusser, Daniel Tang, Wenbo Metzdorf, Norbert Dahl, Ronald Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) compared the safety and efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A prespecified spirometry substudy compared the lung function efficacy between treatment groups. METHODS: TIOSPIR® was a large-scale, long-term (2.3-year), event-driven, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of 17,135 patients with COPD. In the spirometry substudy, trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured at baseline and every 24 weeks for the duration of the trial. RESULTS: The substudy included 1370 patients who received once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (n = 461), 2.5 μg (n = 464), or tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg (n = 445). Adjusted mean trough FEV(1) (average 24–120 weeks) was 1.285, 1.258, and 1.295 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups (difference versus HandiHaler® [95 % CI]: −10 [−38, 18] mL for Respimat® 5 μg and, −37 [−65, −9] mL for Respimat® 2.5 μg); achieving noninferiority to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for tiotropium Respimat® 5 but not for 2.5 μg (prespecified analysis). Adjusted mean trough FVC was 2.590, 2.544, and 2.593 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups. The rates of FEV(1) decline over 24 to 120 weeks were similar for the three treatment arms (26, 40, and 34 mL/year for the tiotropium Respimat® 5-μg, 2.5-μg, and HandiHaler® 18-μg groups). The rate of FEV(1) decline in GOLD I + II patients was greater than in GOLD III + IV patients (46 vs. 23 mL/year); as well as in current versus ex-smokers, in patients receiving combination therapies at baseline versus not, and in those experiencing an exacerbation during the study versus not. CONCLUSIONS: The TIOSPIR® spirometry substudy showed that tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg was noninferior to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for trough FEV(1), but Respimat® 2.5 μg was not. Tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg provides similar bronchodilator efficacy to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg with comparable rates of FEV(1) decline. The rate of FEV(1) decline varied based on disease severity, with a steeper rate of decline observed in patients with moderate airway obstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01126437. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-15 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4570597/ /pubmed/26369563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4 Text en © Anzueto et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Anzueto, Antonio Wise, Robert Calverley, Peter Dusser, Daniel Tang, Wenbo Metzdorf, Norbert Dahl, Ronald The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes |
title | The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes |
title_full | The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes |
title_fullStr | The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes |
title_short | The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes |
title_sort | tiotropium safety and performance in respimat® (tiospir®) trial: spirometry outcomes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anzuetoantonio thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT wiserobert thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT calverleypeter thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT dusserdaniel thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT tangwenbo thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT metzdorfnorbert thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT dahlronald thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT anzuetoantonio tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT wiserobert tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT calverleypeter tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT dusserdaniel tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT tangwenbo tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT metzdorfnorbert tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes AT dahlronald tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes |