Cargando…

The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) compared the safety and efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A prespecified spirometry substudy compared the lung function efficacy between trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anzueto, Antonio, Wise, Robert, Calverley, Peter, Dusser, Daniel, Tang, Wenbo, Metzdorf, Norbert, Dahl, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4
_version_ 1782390224600432640
author Anzueto, Antonio
Wise, Robert
Calverley, Peter
Dusser, Daniel
Tang, Wenbo
Metzdorf, Norbert
Dahl, Ronald
author_facet Anzueto, Antonio
Wise, Robert
Calverley, Peter
Dusser, Daniel
Tang, Wenbo
Metzdorf, Norbert
Dahl, Ronald
author_sort Anzueto, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) compared the safety and efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A prespecified spirometry substudy compared the lung function efficacy between treatment groups. METHODS: TIOSPIR® was a large-scale, long-term (2.3-year), event-driven, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of 17,135 patients with COPD. In the spirometry substudy, trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured at baseline and every 24 weeks for the duration of the trial. RESULTS: The substudy included 1370 patients who received once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (n = 461), 2.5 μg (n = 464), or tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg (n = 445). Adjusted mean trough FEV(1) (average 24–120 weeks) was 1.285, 1.258, and 1.295 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups (difference versus HandiHaler® [95 % CI]: −10 [−38, 18] mL for Respimat® 5 μg and, −37 [−65, −9] mL for Respimat® 2.5 μg); achieving noninferiority to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for tiotropium Respimat® 5 but not for 2.5 μg (prespecified analysis). Adjusted mean trough FVC was 2.590, 2.544, and 2.593 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups. The rates of FEV(1) decline over 24 to 120 weeks were similar for the three treatment arms (26, 40, and 34 mL/year for the tiotropium Respimat® 5-μg, 2.5-μg, and HandiHaler® 18-μg groups). The rate of FEV(1) decline in GOLD I + II patients was greater than in GOLD III + IV patients (46 vs. 23 mL/year); as well as in current versus ex-smokers, in patients receiving combination therapies at baseline versus not, and in those experiencing an exacerbation during the study versus not. CONCLUSIONS: The TIOSPIR® spirometry substudy showed that tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg was noninferior to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for trough FEV(1), but Respimat® 2.5 μg was not. Tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg provides similar bronchodilator efficacy to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg with comparable rates of FEV(1) decline. The rate of FEV(1) decline varied based on disease severity, with a steeper rate of decline observed in patients with moderate airway obstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01126437. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4570597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45705972015-09-16 The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes Anzueto, Antonio Wise, Robert Calverley, Peter Dusser, Daniel Tang, Wenbo Metzdorf, Norbert Dahl, Ronald Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) compared the safety and efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A prespecified spirometry substudy compared the lung function efficacy between treatment groups. METHODS: TIOSPIR® was a large-scale, long-term (2.3-year), event-driven, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of 17,135 patients with COPD. In the spirometry substudy, trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured at baseline and every 24 weeks for the duration of the trial. RESULTS: The substudy included 1370 patients who received once-daily tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg (n = 461), 2.5 μg (n = 464), or tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg (n = 445). Adjusted mean trough FEV(1) (average 24–120 weeks) was 1.285, 1.258, and 1.295 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups (difference versus HandiHaler® [95 % CI]: −10 [−38, 18] mL for Respimat® 5 μg and, −37 [−65, −9] mL for Respimat® 2.5 μg); achieving noninferiority to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for tiotropium Respimat® 5 but not for 2.5 μg (prespecified analysis). Adjusted mean trough FVC was 2.590, 2.544, and 2.593 L in the Respimat® 5 μg, 2.5 μg, and HandiHaler® 18 μg groups. The rates of FEV(1) decline over 24 to 120 weeks were similar for the three treatment arms (26, 40, and 34 mL/year for the tiotropium Respimat® 5-μg, 2.5-μg, and HandiHaler® 18-μg groups). The rate of FEV(1) decline in GOLD I + II patients was greater than in GOLD III + IV patients (46 vs. 23 mL/year); as well as in current versus ex-smokers, in patients receiving combination therapies at baseline versus not, and in those experiencing an exacerbation during the study versus not. CONCLUSIONS: The TIOSPIR® spirometry substudy showed that tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg was noninferior to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg for trough FEV(1), but Respimat® 2.5 μg was not. Tiotropium Respimat® 5 μg provides similar bronchodilator efficacy to tiotropium HandiHaler® 18 μg with comparable rates of FEV(1) decline. The rate of FEV(1) decline varied based on disease severity, with a steeper rate of decline observed in patients with moderate airway obstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01126437. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-15 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4570597/ /pubmed/26369563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4 Text en © Anzueto et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Anzueto, Antonio
Wise, Robert
Calverley, Peter
Dusser, Daniel
Tang, Wenbo
Metzdorf, Norbert
Dahl, Ronald
The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes
title The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes
title_full The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes
title_fullStr The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes
title_short The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes
title_sort tiotropium safety and performance in respimat® (tiospir®) trial: spirometry outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0269-4
work_keys_str_mv AT anzuetoantonio thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT wiserobert thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT calverleypeter thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT dusserdaniel thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT tangwenbo thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT metzdorfnorbert thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT dahlronald thetiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT anzuetoantonio tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT wiserobert tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT calverleypeter tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT dusserdaniel tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT tangwenbo tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT metzdorfnorbert tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes
AT dahlronald tiotropiumsafetyandperformanceinrespimattiospirtrialspirometryoutcomes