Cargando…

Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers

INTRODUCTION: Mobilisation of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is an area of growing research. Currently, there is little data on baseline mobilisation practises and the barriers to them for patients of all admission diagnoses. METHODS: The objectives of the study were to (1) quantify and b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrold, Meg E., Salisbury, Lisa G., Webb, Steve A., Allison, Garry T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26370550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1033-3
_version_ 1782390229189001216
author Harrold, Meg E.
Salisbury, Lisa G.
Webb, Steve A.
Allison, Garry T.
author_facet Harrold, Meg E.
Salisbury, Lisa G.
Webb, Steve A.
Allison, Garry T.
author_sort Harrold, Meg E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Mobilisation of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is an area of growing research. Currently, there is little data on baseline mobilisation practises and the barriers to them for patients of all admission diagnoses. METHODS: The objectives of the study were to (1) quantify and benchmark baseline levels of mobilisation in Australian and Scottish ICUs, (2) compare mobilisation practises between Australian and Scottish ICUs and (3) identify barriers to mobilisation in Australian and Scottish ICUs. We conducted a prospective, observational, cohort study with a 4-week inception period. Patients were censored for follow-up upon ICU discharge or after 28 days, whichever occurred first. Patients were included if they were >18 years of age, admitted to an ICU and received mechanical ventilation in the ICU. RESULTS: Ten tertiary ICUs in Australia and nine in Scotland participated in the study. The Australian cohort had a large proportion of patients admitted for cardiothoracic surgery (43.3 %), whereas the Scottish cohort had none. Therefore, comparison analysis was done after exclusion of patients admitted for cardiothoracic surgery. In total, 60.2 % of the 347 patients across 10 Australian ICUs and 40.1 % of the 167 patients across 9 Scottish ICUs mobilised during their ICU stay (p < 0.001). Patients in the Australian cohort were more likely to mobilise than patients in the Scottish cohort (hazard ratio 1.83, 95 % confidence interval 1.38–2.42). However, the percentage of episodes of mobilisation where patients were receiving mechanical ventilation was higher in the Scottish cohort (41.1 % vs 16.3 %, p < 0.001). Sedation was the most commonly reported barrier to mobilisation in both the Australian and Scottish cohorts. Physiological instability and the presence of an endotracheal tube were also frequently reported barriers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to benchmark baseline practise of early mobilisation internationally, and it demonstrates variation in early mobilisation practises between Australia and Scotland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4570617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45706172015-09-16 Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers Harrold, Meg E. Salisbury, Lisa G. Webb, Steve A. Allison, Garry T. Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Mobilisation of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is an area of growing research. Currently, there is little data on baseline mobilisation practises and the barriers to them for patients of all admission diagnoses. METHODS: The objectives of the study were to (1) quantify and benchmark baseline levels of mobilisation in Australian and Scottish ICUs, (2) compare mobilisation practises between Australian and Scottish ICUs and (3) identify barriers to mobilisation in Australian and Scottish ICUs. We conducted a prospective, observational, cohort study with a 4-week inception period. Patients were censored for follow-up upon ICU discharge or after 28 days, whichever occurred first. Patients were included if they were >18 years of age, admitted to an ICU and received mechanical ventilation in the ICU. RESULTS: Ten tertiary ICUs in Australia and nine in Scotland participated in the study. The Australian cohort had a large proportion of patients admitted for cardiothoracic surgery (43.3 %), whereas the Scottish cohort had none. Therefore, comparison analysis was done after exclusion of patients admitted for cardiothoracic surgery. In total, 60.2 % of the 347 patients across 10 Australian ICUs and 40.1 % of the 167 patients across 9 Scottish ICUs mobilised during their ICU stay (p < 0.001). Patients in the Australian cohort were more likely to mobilise than patients in the Scottish cohort (hazard ratio 1.83, 95 % confidence interval 1.38–2.42). However, the percentage of episodes of mobilisation where patients were receiving mechanical ventilation was higher in the Scottish cohort (41.1 % vs 16.3 %, p < 0.001). Sedation was the most commonly reported barrier to mobilisation in both the Australian and Scottish cohorts. Physiological instability and the presence of an endotracheal tube were also frequently reported barriers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to benchmark baseline practise of early mobilisation internationally, and it demonstrates variation in early mobilisation practises between Australia and Scotland. BioMed Central 2015-09-14 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4570617/ /pubmed/26370550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1033-3 Text en © Harrold et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Harrold, Meg E.
Salisbury, Lisa G.
Webb, Steve A.
Allison, Garry T.
Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers
title Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers
title_full Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers
title_fullStr Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers
title_full_unstemmed Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers
title_short Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers
title_sort early mobilisation in intensive care units in australia and scotland: a prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26370550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1033-3
work_keys_str_mv AT harroldmege earlymobilisationinintensivecareunitsinaustraliaandscotlandaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudyexaminingmobilisationpractisesandbarriers
AT salisburylisag earlymobilisationinintensivecareunitsinaustraliaandscotlandaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudyexaminingmobilisationpractisesandbarriers
AT webbstevea earlymobilisationinintensivecareunitsinaustraliaandscotlandaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudyexaminingmobilisationpractisesandbarriers
AT allisongarryt earlymobilisationinintensivecareunitsinaustraliaandscotlandaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudyexaminingmobilisationpractisesandbarriers
AT earlymobilisationinintensivecareunitsinaustraliaandscotlandaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudyexaminingmobilisationpractisesandbarriers