Cargando…

Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings

Post-licensure real world evaluation of vaccine implementation is important for establishing evidence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and programme impact, including indirect effects. Large cohort studies offer an important epidemiological approach for evaluating VE, but have inherent methodological c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, C., Beard, J., Crampin, A.C., Costello, A., Mwansambo, C., Cunliffe, N.A., Heyderman, R.S., French, N., Bar-Zeev, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26235370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.062
_version_ 1782390277510529024
author King, C.
Beard, J.
Crampin, A.C.
Costello, A.
Mwansambo, C.
Cunliffe, N.A.
Heyderman, R.S.
French, N.
Bar-Zeev, N.
author_facet King, C.
Beard, J.
Crampin, A.C.
Costello, A.
Mwansambo, C.
Cunliffe, N.A.
Heyderman, R.S.
French, N.
Bar-Zeev, N.
author_sort King, C.
collection PubMed
description Post-licensure real world evaluation of vaccine implementation is important for establishing evidence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and programme impact, including indirect effects. Large cohort studies offer an important epidemiological approach for evaluating VE, but have inherent methodological challenges. Since March 2012, we have conducted an open prospective cohort study in two sites in rural Malawi to evaluate the post-introduction effectiveness of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) against all-cause post-neonatal infant mortality and monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) against diarrhoea-related post-neonatal infant mortality. Our study sites cover a population of 500,000, with a baseline post-neonatal infant mortality of 25 per 1000 live births. We conducted a methodological review of cohort studies for vaccine effectiveness in a developing country setting, applied to our study context. Based on published literature, we outline key considerations when defining the denominator (study population), exposure (vaccination status) and outcome ascertainment (mortality and cause of death) of such studies. We assess various definitions in these three domains, in terms of their impact on power, effect size and potential biases and their direction, using our cohort study for illustration. Based on this iterative process, we discuss the pros and cons of our final per-protocol analysis plan. Since no single set of definitions or analytical approach accounts for all possible biases, we propose sensitivity analyses to interrogate our assumptions and methodological decisions. In the poorest regions of the world where routine vital birth and death surveillance are frequently unavailable and the burden of disease and death is greatest We conclude that provided the balance between definitions and their overall assumed impact on estimated VE are acknowledged, such large scale real-world cohort studies can provide crucial information to policymakers by providing robust and compelling evidence of total benefits of newly introduced vaccines on reducing child mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4570930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45709302015-10-06 Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings King, C. Beard, J. Crampin, A.C. Costello, A. Mwansambo, C. Cunliffe, N.A. Heyderman, R.S. French, N. Bar-Zeev, N. Vaccine Review Post-licensure real world evaluation of vaccine implementation is important for establishing evidence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and programme impact, including indirect effects. Large cohort studies offer an important epidemiological approach for evaluating VE, but have inherent methodological challenges. Since March 2012, we have conducted an open prospective cohort study in two sites in rural Malawi to evaluate the post-introduction effectiveness of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) against all-cause post-neonatal infant mortality and monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) against diarrhoea-related post-neonatal infant mortality. Our study sites cover a population of 500,000, with a baseline post-neonatal infant mortality of 25 per 1000 live births. We conducted a methodological review of cohort studies for vaccine effectiveness in a developing country setting, applied to our study context. Based on published literature, we outline key considerations when defining the denominator (study population), exposure (vaccination status) and outcome ascertainment (mortality and cause of death) of such studies. We assess various definitions in these three domains, in terms of their impact on power, effect size and potential biases and their direction, using our cohort study for illustration. Based on this iterative process, we discuss the pros and cons of our final per-protocol analysis plan. Since no single set of definitions or analytical approach accounts for all possible biases, we propose sensitivity analyses to interrogate our assumptions and methodological decisions. In the poorest regions of the world where routine vital birth and death surveillance are frequently unavailable and the burden of disease and death is greatest We conclude that provided the balance between definitions and their overall assumed impact on estimated VE are acknowledged, such large scale real-world cohort studies can provide crucial information to policymakers by providing robust and compelling evidence of total benefits of newly introduced vaccines on reducing child mortality. Elsevier Science 2015-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4570930/ /pubmed/26235370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.062 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
King, C.
Beard, J.
Crampin, A.C.
Costello, A.
Mwansambo, C.
Cunliffe, N.A.
Heyderman, R.S.
French, N.
Bar-Zeev, N.
Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings
title Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings
title_full Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings
title_fullStr Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings
title_full_unstemmed Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings
title_short Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings
title_sort methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26235370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.062
work_keys_str_mv AT kingc methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT beardj methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT crampinac methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT costelloa methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT mwansamboc methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT cunliffena methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT heydermanrs methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT frenchn methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT barzeevn methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings
AT methodologicalchallengesinmeasuringvaccineeffectivenessusingpopulationcohortsinlowresourcesettings