Cargando…

First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle

Control of Fasciola hepatica infection in livestock is based on annual treatment using flukicides such as triclabendazole, albendazole and closantel. However, triclabendazole resistant F. hepatica populations are emerging worldwide and resistance is emerging to albendazole, whereas it has until now...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novobilský, Adam, Höglund, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2015.07.003
_version_ 1782390393070944256
author Novobilský, Adam
Höglund, Johan
author_facet Novobilský, Adam
Höglund, Johan
author_sort Novobilský, Adam
collection PubMed
description Control of Fasciola hepatica infection in livestock is based on annual treatment using flukicides such as triclabendazole, albendazole and closantel. However, triclabendazole resistant F. hepatica populations are emerging worldwide and resistance is emerging to albendazole, whereas it has until now never been described for closantel. In Sweden, a topical formulation containing a combination of closantel and ivermectin (Closamectin Pour On) has been registered for use in cattle only since 2011. This study evaluated the efficacy of closantel against F. hepatica in naturally infected beef cattle using both coproantigen and faecal egg count reduction tests. Faecal egg counts (FEC) and coproantigen ELISA examinations were conducted in February 2014 in three beef cattle herds (A, B, C) in south-western Sweden. On each farm, 10 F. hepatica coproantigen-positive and F. hepatica egg-positive animals were allocated after 12–16 weeks of housing into groups and treated topically with a minimum of 20 mg closantel per kg body weight. Faecal samples were collected from selected animals on 0, 7 and 21 day post-treatment (PT). Based on FEC, closantel efficacy 21 days PT was 72% (95% CI: 65–77%) and 97% (95% CI: 95–98%) on farms A and B, respectively. No FEC reduction at all was observed on farm C. In total, 4, 1 and 6 animals remained coproantigen-positive at 21 days PT on farms A, B and C, respectively. Closantel treatment failure was confirmed on two of the farms. As the animals were housed 12–16 weeks before treatment and thereafter during the entire study, failure due to the presence of juvenile flukes was excluded. Although the cause of closantel failure currently remains unclear, development of resistance or/and absorption failure of topical administration should be considered. To our knowledge, this is the first report of closantel treatment failure against F. hepatica in cattle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4572398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45723982015-10-07 First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle Novobilský, Adam Höglund, Johan Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist Brief Report Control of Fasciola hepatica infection in livestock is based on annual treatment using flukicides such as triclabendazole, albendazole and closantel. However, triclabendazole resistant F. hepatica populations are emerging worldwide and resistance is emerging to albendazole, whereas it has until now never been described for closantel. In Sweden, a topical formulation containing a combination of closantel and ivermectin (Closamectin Pour On) has been registered for use in cattle only since 2011. This study evaluated the efficacy of closantel against F. hepatica in naturally infected beef cattle using both coproantigen and faecal egg count reduction tests. Faecal egg counts (FEC) and coproantigen ELISA examinations were conducted in February 2014 in three beef cattle herds (A, B, C) in south-western Sweden. On each farm, 10 F. hepatica coproantigen-positive and F. hepatica egg-positive animals were allocated after 12–16 weeks of housing into groups and treated topically with a minimum of 20 mg closantel per kg body weight. Faecal samples were collected from selected animals on 0, 7 and 21 day post-treatment (PT). Based on FEC, closantel efficacy 21 days PT was 72% (95% CI: 65–77%) and 97% (95% CI: 95–98%) on farms A and B, respectively. No FEC reduction at all was observed on farm C. In total, 4, 1 and 6 animals remained coproantigen-positive at 21 days PT on farms A, B and C, respectively. Closantel treatment failure was confirmed on two of the farms. As the animals were housed 12–16 weeks before treatment and thereafter during the entire study, failure due to the presence of juvenile flukes was excluded. Although the cause of closantel failure currently remains unclear, development of resistance or/and absorption failure of topical administration should be considered. To our knowledge, this is the first report of closantel treatment failure against F. hepatica in cattle. Elsevier 2015-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4572398/ /pubmed/26448903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2015.07.003 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Novobilský, Adam
Höglund, Johan
First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle
title First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle
title_full First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle
title_fullStr First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle
title_full_unstemmed First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle
title_short First report of closantel treatment failure against Fasciola hepatica in cattle
title_sort first report of closantel treatment failure against fasciola hepatica in cattle
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2015.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT novobilskyadam firstreportofclosanteltreatmentfailureagainstfasciolahepaticaincattle
AT hoglundjohan firstreportofclosanteltreatmentfailureagainstfasciolahepaticaincattle