Cargando…
In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
BACKGROUND: Whether, and how, animals move requires them to assess their environment to determine the most appropriate action and trajectory, although the precise way the environment is scanned has been little studied. We hypothesized that head attitude, which effectively frames the environment for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-015-0051-8 |
_version_ | 1782390416499277824 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia Norman, Brad Walker, James Williams, Hannah J. Holton, M. D. Clarke, D. Wilson, Rory P. |
author_facet | Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia Norman, Brad Walker, James Williams, Hannah J. Holton, M. D. Clarke, D. Wilson, Rory P. |
author_sort | Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whether, and how, animals move requires them to assess their environment to determine the most appropriate action and trajectory, although the precise way the environment is scanned has been little studied. We hypothesized that head attitude, which effectively frames the environment for the eyes, and the way it changes over time, would be modulated by the environment. METHOD: To test this, we used a head-mounted device (Human-Interfaced Personal Observation platform - HIPOP) on people moving through three different environments; a botanical garden (‘green’ space), a reef (‘blue’ space), and a featureless corridor, to examine if head movement in the vertical axis differed between environments. Template matching was used to identify and quantify distinct behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The data on head pitch from all subjects and environments over time showed essentially continuous clear waveforms with varying amplitude and wavelength. There were three stylised behaviours consisting of smooth, regular peaks and troughs in head pitch angle and variable length fixations during which the head pitch remained constant. These three behaviours accounted for ca. 40 % of the total time, with irregular head pitch changes accounting for the rest. There were differences in rates of manifestation of behaviour according to environment as well as environmentally different head pitch values of peaks, troughs and fixations. Finally, although there was considerable variation in head pitch angles, the peak and trough values bounded most of the variation in the fixation pitch values. It is suggested that the constant waveforms in head pitch serve to inform people about their environment, providing a scanning mechanism. Particular emphasis to certain sectors is manifest within the peak and trough limits and these appear modulated by the distribution of the points where fixation, interpreted as being due to objects of interest, occurs. This behaviour explains how animals allocate processing resources to the environment and shows promise for movement studies attempting to elucidate which parts of the environment affect movement trajectories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4572619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45726192015-09-18 In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia Norman, Brad Walker, James Williams, Hannah J. Holton, M. D. Clarke, D. Wilson, Rory P. Mov Ecol Research BACKGROUND: Whether, and how, animals move requires them to assess their environment to determine the most appropriate action and trajectory, although the precise way the environment is scanned has been little studied. We hypothesized that head attitude, which effectively frames the environment for the eyes, and the way it changes over time, would be modulated by the environment. METHOD: To test this, we used a head-mounted device (Human-Interfaced Personal Observation platform - HIPOP) on people moving through three different environments; a botanical garden (‘green’ space), a reef (‘blue’ space), and a featureless corridor, to examine if head movement in the vertical axis differed between environments. Template matching was used to identify and quantify distinct behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The data on head pitch from all subjects and environments over time showed essentially continuous clear waveforms with varying amplitude and wavelength. There were three stylised behaviours consisting of smooth, regular peaks and troughs in head pitch angle and variable length fixations during which the head pitch remained constant. These three behaviours accounted for ca. 40 % of the total time, with irregular head pitch changes accounting for the rest. There were differences in rates of manifestation of behaviour according to environment as well as environmentally different head pitch values of peaks, troughs and fixations. Finally, although there was considerable variation in head pitch angles, the peak and trough values bounded most of the variation in the fixation pitch values. It is suggested that the constant waveforms in head pitch serve to inform people about their environment, providing a scanning mechanism. Particular emphasis to certain sectors is manifest within the peak and trough limits and these appear modulated by the distribution of the points where fixation, interpreted as being due to objects of interest, occurs. This behaviour explains how animals allocate processing resources to the environment and shows promise for movement studies attempting to elucidate which parts of the environment affect movement trajectories. BioMed Central 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4572619/ /pubmed/26380712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-015-0051-8 Text en © Wilson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia Norman, Brad Walker, James Williams, Hannah J. Holton, M. D. Clarke, D. Wilson, Rory P. In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch |
title | In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch |
title_full | In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch |
title_fullStr | In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch |
title_full_unstemmed | In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch |
title_short | In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch |
title_sort | in search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-015-0051-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsongwendolineixia insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch AT normanbrad insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch AT walkerjames insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch AT williamshannahj insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch AT holtonmd insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch AT clarked insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch AT wilsonroryp insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch |