Cargando…

In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch

BACKGROUND: Whether, and how, animals move requires them to assess their environment to determine the most appropriate action and trajectory, although the precise way the environment is scanned has been little studied. We hypothesized that head attitude, which effectively frames the environment for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia, Norman, Brad, Walker, James, Williams, Hannah J., Holton, M. D., Clarke, D., Wilson, Rory P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-015-0051-8
_version_ 1782390416499277824
author Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia
Norman, Brad
Walker, James
Williams, Hannah J.
Holton, M. D.
Clarke, D.
Wilson, Rory P.
author_facet Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia
Norman, Brad
Walker, James
Williams, Hannah J.
Holton, M. D.
Clarke, D.
Wilson, Rory P.
author_sort Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether, and how, animals move requires them to assess their environment to determine the most appropriate action and trajectory, although the precise way the environment is scanned has been little studied. We hypothesized that head attitude, which effectively frames the environment for the eyes, and the way it changes over time, would be modulated by the environment. METHOD: To test this, we used a head-mounted device (Human-Interfaced Personal Observation platform - HIPOP) on people moving through three different environments; a botanical garden (‘green’ space), a reef (‘blue’ space), and a featureless corridor, to examine if head movement in the vertical axis differed between environments. Template matching was used to identify and quantify distinct behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The data on head pitch from all subjects and environments over time showed essentially continuous clear waveforms with varying amplitude and wavelength. There were three stylised behaviours consisting of smooth, regular peaks and troughs in head pitch angle and variable length fixations during which the head pitch remained constant. These three behaviours accounted for ca. 40 % of the total time, with irregular head pitch changes accounting for the rest. There were differences in rates of manifestation of behaviour according to environment as well as environmentally different head pitch values of peaks, troughs and fixations. Finally, although there was considerable variation in head pitch angles, the peak and trough values bounded most of the variation in the fixation pitch values. It is suggested that the constant waveforms in head pitch serve to inform people about their environment, providing a scanning mechanism. Particular emphasis to certain sectors is manifest within the peak and trough limits and these appear modulated by the distribution of the points where fixation, interpreted as being due to objects of interest, occurs. This behaviour explains how animals allocate processing resources to the environment and shows promise for movement studies attempting to elucidate which parts of the environment affect movement trajectories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4572619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45726192015-09-18 In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia Norman, Brad Walker, James Williams, Hannah J. Holton, M. D. Clarke, D. Wilson, Rory P. Mov Ecol Research BACKGROUND: Whether, and how, animals move requires them to assess their environment to determine the most appropriate action and trajectory, although the precise way the environment is scanned has been little studied. We hypothesized that head attitude, which effectively frames the environment for the eyes, and the way it changes over time, would be modulated by the environment. METHOD: To test this, we used a head-mounted device (Human-Interfaced Personal Observation platform - HIPOP) on people moving through three different environments; a botanical garden (‘green’ space), a reef (‘blue’ space), and a featureless corridor, to examine if head movement in the vertical axis differed between environments. Template matching was used to identify and quantify distinct behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The data on head pitch from all subjects and environments over time showed essentially continuous clear waveforms with varying amplitude and wavelength. There were three stylised behaviours consisting of smooth, regular peaks and troughs in head pitch angle and variable length fixations during which the head pitch remained constant. These three behaviours accounted for ca. 40 % of the total time, with irregular head pitch changes accounting for the rest. There were differences in rates of manifestation of behaviour according to environment as well as environmentally different head pitch values of peaks, troughs and fixations. Finally, although there was considerable variation in head pitch angles, the peak and trough values bounded most of the variation in the fixation pitch values. It is suggested that the constant waveforms in head pitch serve to inform people about their environment, providing a scanning mechanism. Particular emphasis to certain sectors is manifest within the peak and trough limits and these appear modulated by the distribution of the points where fixation, interpreted as being due to objects of interest, occurs. This behaviour explains how animals allocate processing resources to the environment and shows promise for movement studies attempting to elucidate which parts of the environment affect movement trajectories. BioMed Central 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4572619/ /pubmed/26380712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-015-0051-8 Text en © Wilson et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wilson, Gwendoline Ixia
Norman, Brad
Walker, James
Williams, Hannah J.
Holton, M. D.
Clarke, D.
Wilson, Rory P.
In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
title In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
title_full In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
title_fullStr In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
title_full_unstemmed In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
title_short In search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
title_sort in search of rules behind environmental framing; the case of head pitch
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-015-0051-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsongwendolineixia insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch
AT normanbrad insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch
AT walkerjames insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch
AT williamshannahj insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch
AT holtonmd insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch
AT clarked insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch
AT wilsonroryp insearchofrulesbehindenvironmentalframingthecaseofheadpitch