Cargando…

Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared two "public health emergencies of international concern", in response to the worldwide polio situation and the Ebola epidemic in West Africa respectively. Both emergencies can be seen as testing moments, challenging the curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calain, Philippe, Abu Sa’Da, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0058-1
_version_ 1782390422864134144
author Calain, Philippe
Abu Sa’Da, Caroline
author_facet Calain, Philippe
Abu Sa’Da, Caroline
author_sort Calain, Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared two "public health emergencies of international concern", in response to the worldwide polio situation and the Ebola epidemic in West Africa respectively. Both emergencies can be seen as testing moments, challenging the current model of epidemic governance, where two worldviews co-exist: global health security and humanitarian biomedicine. DISCUSSION: The resurgence of polio and the spread of Ebola in 2014 have not only exposed the weaknesses of national health systems, but also the shortcomings of the current global health regime in dealing with transnational epidemic threats. These shortcomings are of three sorts. Firstly, the global health regime is fragmented and dominated by the domestic security priorities of industrialised nations. Secondly, the WHO has been constrained by constitutional country allegiances, crippling reforms and the limited impact of the (2005) International Health Regulations (IHR) framework. Thirdly, the securitization of infectious diseases and the militarization of humanitarian aid undermine the establishment of credible public health surveillance networks and the capacity to control epidemic threats. SUMMARY: The securitization of communicable diseases has so far led foreign aid policies to sideline health systems. It has also been the source of ongoing misperceptions over the aims of global health initiatives. With its strict allegiance to Member States, the WHO mandate is problematic, particularly when it comes to controlling epidemic diseases. In this context, humanitarian medical organizations are expected to palliate the absence of public health services in the most destitute areas, particularly in conflict zones. The militarization of humanitarian aid itself threatens this fragile and imperfect equilibrium. None of the reforms announced by the WHO in the wake of the 68(th) World Health Assembly address these fundamental issues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13031-015-0058-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4572646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45726462015-09-18 Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime Calain, Philippe Abu Sa’Da, Caroline Confl Health Debate BACKGROUND: In 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared two "public health emergencies of international concern", in response to the worldwide polio situation and the Ebola epidemic in West Africa respectively. Both emergencies can be seen as testing moments, challenging the current model of epidemic governance, where two worldviews co-exist: global health security and humanitarian biomedicine. DISCUSSION: The resurgence of polio and the spread of Ebola in 2014 have not only exposed the weaknesses of national health systems, but also the shortcomings of the current global health regime in dealing with transnational epidemic threats. These shortcomings are of three sorts. Firstly, the global health regime is fragmented and dominated by the domestic security priorities of industrialised nations. Secondly, the WHO has been constrained by constitutional country allegiances, crippling reforms and the limited impact of the (2005) International Health Regulations (IHR) framework. Thirdly, the securitization of infectious diseases and the militarization of humanitarian aid undermine the establishment of credible public health surveillance networks and the capacity to control epidemic threats. SUMMARY: The securitization of communicable diseases has so far led foreign aid policies to sideline health systems. It has also been the source of ongoing misperceptions over the aims of global health initiatives. With its strict allegiance to Member States, the WHO mandate is problematic, particularly when it comes to controlling epidemic diseases. In this context, humanitarian medical organizations are expected to palliate the absence of public health services in the most destitute areas, particularly in conflict zones. The militarization of humanitarian aid itself threatens this fragile and imperfect equilibrium. None of the reforms announced by the WHO in the wake of the 68(th) World Health Assembly address these fundamental issues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13031-015-0058-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4572646/ /pubmed/26380580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0058-1 Text en © Calain and Abu Sa’Da. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Calain, Philippe
Abu Sa’Da, Caroline
Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime
title Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime
title_full Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime
title_fullStr Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime
title_full_unstemmed Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime
title_short Coincident polio and Ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime
title_sort coincident polio and ebola crises expose similar fault lines in the current global health regime
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0058-1
work_keys_str_mv AT calainphilippe coincidentpolioandebolacrisesexposesimilarfaultlinesinthecurrentglobalhealthregime
AT abusadacaroline coincidentpolioandebolacrisesexposesimilarfaultlinesinthecurrentglobalhealthregime