Cargando…
Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in research and clinical practice involving individuals with visual impairment following stroke and to evaluate their content validity against quality assessment criteria. METHOD: A systematic review of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x |
_version_ | 1782390432296075264 |
---|---|
author | Hepworth, Lauren R. Rowe, Fiona J. Harper, Robert Jarvis, Kathryn Shipman, Tracey Rodgers, Helen |
author_facet | Hepworth, Lauren R. Rowe, Fiona J. Harper, Robert Jarvis, Kathryn Shipman, Tracey Rodgers, Helen |
author_sort | Hepworth, Lauren R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in research and clinical practice involving individuals with visual impairment following stroke and to evaluate their content validity against quality assessment criteria. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify articles related to the development and/or validation of PROMS. We searched scholarly online resources and hand searched journals. Search terms included MESH terms and alternatives relating to PROMs, visual impairments and quality of life. Data were extracted relating to the development and validation of the included instruments. The quality of the development process was assessed using a modified version of a PROM quality assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 142 PROMs were identified, 34 vision-specific PROMs were relevant and available to be analysed in this review. Quality appraisal identified four highly rated instruments: the National Eye Institute Visual Functional Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), Activity Inventory (AI), Daily Living Tasks Dependant on Vision (DLTV) and Veterans Affairs Low Visual Function Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ). The four instruments have only been used with either a limited number of stroke survivors or a sub-population within visual impairment following stroke. CONCLUSION: No instruments were identified which specifically targeted individuals with visual impairment following stroke. Further research is required to identify the items which a population of stroke survivors with visual impairment consider to be of most importance. The validation of a combination of instruments or a new instrument for use with this population is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4572686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45726862015-09-18 Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review Hepworth, Lauren R. Rowe, Fiona J. Harper, Robert Jarvis, Kathryn Shipman, Tracey Rodgers, Helen Health Qual Life Outcomes Review PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in research and clinical practice involving individuals with visual impairment following stroke and to evaluate their content validity against quality assessment criteria. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify articles related to the development and/or validation of PROMS. We searched scholarly online resources and hand searched journals. Search terms included MESH terms and alternatives relating to PROMs, visual impairments and quality of life. Data were extracted relating to the development and validation of the included instruments. The quality of the development process was assessed using a modified version of a PROM quality assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 142 PROMs were identified, 34 vision-specific PROMs were relevant and available to be analysed in this review. Quality appraisal identified four highly rated instruments: the National Eye Institute Visual Functional Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), Activity Inventory (AI), Daily Living Tasks Dependant on Vision (DLTV) and Veterans Affairs Low Visual Function Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ). The four instruments have only been used with either a limited number of stroke survivors or a sub-population within visual impairment following stroke. CONCLUSION: No instruments were identified which specifically targeted individuals with visual impairment following stroke. Further research is required to identify the items which a population of stroke survivors with visual impairment consider to be of most importance. The validation of a combination of instruments or a new instrument for use with this population is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4572686/ /pubmed/26374628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x Text en © Hepworth et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Hepworth, Lauren R. Rowe, Fiona J. Harper, Robert Jarvis, Kathryn Shipman, Tracey Rodgers, Helen Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review |
title | Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review |
title_full | Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review |
title_short | Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review |
title_sort | patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hepworthlaurenr patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview AT rowefionaj patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview AT harperrobert patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview AT jarviskathryn patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview AT shipmantracey patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview AT rodgershelen patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview |