Cargando…

Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review

PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in research and clinical practice involving individuals with visual impairment following stroke and to evaluate their content validity against quality assessment criteria. METHOD: A systematic review of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hepworth, Lauren R., Rowe, Fiona J., Harper, Robert, Jarvis, Kathryn, Shipman, Tracey, Rodgers, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x
_version_ 1782390432296075264
author Hepworth, Lauren R.
Rowe, Fiona J.
Harper, Robert
Jarvis, Kathryn
Shipman, Tracey
Rodgers, Helen
author_facet Hepworth, Lauren R.
Rowe, Fiona J.
Harper, Robert
Jarvis, Kathryn
Shipman, Tracey
Rodgers, Helen
author_sort Hepworth, Lauren R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in research and clinical practice involving individuals with visual impairment following stroke and to evaluate their content validity against quality assessment criteria. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify articles related to the development and/or validation of PROMS. We searched scholarly online resources and hand searched journals. Search terms included MESH terms and alternatives relating to PROMs, visual impairments and quality of life. Data were extracted relating to the development and validation of the included instruments. The quality of the development process was assessed using a modified version of a PROM quality assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 142 PROMs were identified, 34 vision-specific PROMs were relevant and available to be analysed in this review. Quality appraisal identified four highly rated instruments: the National Eye Institute Visual Functional Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), Activity Inventory (AI), Daily Living Tasks Dependant on Vision (DLTV) and Veterans Affairs Low Visual Function Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ). The four instruments have only been used with either a limited number of stroke survivors or a sub-population within visual impairment following stroke. CONCLUSION: No instruments were identified which specifically targeted individuals with visual impairment following stroke. Further research is required to identify the items which a population of stroke survivors with visual impairment consider to be of most importance. The validation of a combination of instruments or a new instrument for use with this population is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4572686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45726862015-09-18 Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review Hepworth, Lauren R. Rowe, Fiona J. Harper, Robert Jarvis, Kathryn Shipman, Tracey Rodgers, Helen Health Qual Life Outcomes Review PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in research and clinical practice involving individuals with visual impairment following stroke and to evaluate their content validity against quality assessment criteria. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify articles related to the development and/or validation of PROMS. We searched scholarly online resources and hand searched journals. Search terms included MESH terms and alternatives relating to PROMs, visual impairments and quality of life. Data were extracted relating to the development and validation of the included instruments. The quality of the development process was assessed using a modified version of a PROM quality assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 142 PROMs were identified, 34 vision-specific PROMs were relevant and available to be analysed in this review. Quality appraisal identified four highly rated instruments: the National Eye Institute Visual Functional Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), Activity Inventory (AI), Daily Living Tasks Dependant on Vision (DLTV) and Veterans Affairs Low Visual Function Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ). The four instruments have only been used with either a limited number of stroke survivors or a sub-population within visual impairment following stroke. CONCLUSION: No instruments were identified which specifically targeted individuals with visual impairment following stroke. Further research is required to identify the items which a population of stroke survivors with visual impairment consider to be of most importance. The validation of a combination of instruments or a new instrument for use with this population is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4572686/ /pubmed/26374628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x Text en © Hepworth et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Hepworth, Lauren R.
Rowe, Fiona J.
Harper, Robert
Jarvis, Kathryn
Shipman, Tracey
Rodgers, Helen
Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
title Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
title_full Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
title_fullStr Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
title_short Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
title_sort patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0338-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hepworthlaurenr patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT rowefionaj patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT harperrobert patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT jarviskathryn patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT shipmantracey patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT rodgershelen patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforvisualimpairmentafterstrokeasystematicreview