Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Several new fixed-dose combination bronchodilators have been recently launched, and assessing their efficacy relative to each other, and with open dual combinations is desirable. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the efficacy of umeclidinium and vilanterol (UMEC/VI) with that of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392761 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S87082 |
_version_ | 1782390456954388480 |
---|---|
author | Huisman, Eline L Cockle, Sarah M Ismaila, Afisi S Karabis, Andreas Punekar, Yogesh Suresh |
author_facet | Huisman, Eline L Cockle, Sarah M Ismaila, Afisi S Karabis, Andreas Punekar, Yogesh Suresh |
author_sort | Huisman, Eline L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several new fixed-dose combination bronchodilators have been recently launched, and assessing their efficacy relative to each other, and with open dual combinations is desirable. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the efficacy of umeclidinium and vilanterol (UMEC/VI) with that of available dual bronchodilators in single/separate inhalers. METHODS: A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials of ≥10 weeks among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (≥40 years), assessing the efficacy of combination bronchodilators in single or separate inhalers. Comparative assessment was conducted on change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores, transitional dyspnea index (TDI) focal scores, and rescue medication use at 12 weeks and 24 weeks using an NMA within a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: A systematic literature review identified 77 articles of 26 trials comparing UMEC/VI, indacaterol/glycopyrronium (QVA149), formoterol plus tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg, salmeterol plus TIO, or indacaterol plus TIO, with TIO and placebo as common comparators at 12 weeks and approximately 24 weeks. The NMA showed that at 24 weeks, efficacy of UMEC/VI was not significantly different compared with QVA149 on trough FEV(1) (14.1 mL [95% credible interval: −14.2, 42.3]), SGRQ total score (0.18 [−1.28, 1.63]), TDI focal score (−0.30 [−0.73, 0.13]), and rescue medication use (0.02 [−0.27, 0.32]); compared with salmeterol plus TIO on trough FEV(1) (67.4 mL [−25.3, 159.4]), SGRQ total score (−0.11 [−1.84, 1.61]), and TDI focal score (0.58 [−0.33, 1.50]); and compared with formoterol plus TIO 18 μg on SGRQ total score (−0.68 [−1.77, 0.39]). Results at week 12 were consistent with week 24 outcomes. Due to lack of availability of evidence, no comparison was made with formoterol plus TIO on FEV(1) or TDI at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VI has comparable efficacy to other dual-bronchodilator combinations on available efficacy endpoints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4573199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45731992015-09-21 Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis Huisman, Eline L Cockle, Sarah M Ismaila, Afisi S Karabis, Andreas Punekar, Yogesh Suresh Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Several new fixed-dose combination bronchodilators have been recently launched, and assessing their efficacy relative to each other, and with open dual combinations is desirable. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the efficacy of umeclidinium and vilanterol (UMEC/VI) with that of available dual bronchodilators in single/separate inhalers. METHODS: A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials of ≥10 weeks among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (≥40 years), assessing the efficacy of combination bronchodilators in single or separate inhalers. Comparative assessment was conducted on change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores, transitional dyspnea index (TDI) focal scores, and rescue medication use at 12 weeks and 24 weeks using an NMA within a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: A systematic literature review identified 77 articles of 26 trials comparing UMEC/VI, indacaterol/glycopyrronium (QVA149), formoterol plus tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg, salmeterol plus TIO, or indacaterol plus TIO, with TIO and placebo as common comparators at 12 weeks and approximately 24 weeks. The NMA showed that at 24 weeks, efficacy of UMEC/VI was not significantly different compared with QVA149 on trough FEV(1) (14.1 mL [95% credible interval: −14.2, 42.3]), SGRQ total score (0.18 [−1.28, 1.63]), TDI focal score (−0.30 [−0.73, 0.13]), and rescue medication use (0.02 [−0.27, 0.32]); compared with salmeterol plus TIO on trough FEV(1) (67.4 mL [−25.3, 159.4]), SGRQ total score (−0.11 [−1.84, 1.61]), and TDI focal score (0.58 [−0.33, 1.50]); and compared with formoterol plus TIO 18 μg on SGRQ total score (−0.68 [−1.77, 0.39]). Results at week 12 were consistent with week 24 outcomes. Due to lack of availability of evidence, no comparison was made with formoterol plus TIO on FEV(1) or TDI at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VI has comparable efficacy to other dual-bronchodilator combinations on available efficacy endpoints. Dove Medical Press 2015-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4573199/ /pubmed/26392761 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S87082 Text en © 2015 Huisman et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Huisman, Eline L Cockle, Sarah M Ismaila, Afisi S Karabis, Andreas Punekar, Yogesh Suresh Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in copd: a network meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392761 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S87082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huismanelinel comparativeefficacyofcombinationbronchodilatortherapiesincopdanetworkmetaanalysis AT cocklesarahm comparativeefficacyofcombinationbronchodilatortherapiesincopdanetworkmetaanalysis AT ismailaafisis comparativeefficacyofcombinationbronchodilatortherapiesincopdanetworkmetaanalysis AT karabisandreas comparativeefficacyofcombinationbronchodilatortherapiesincopdanetworkmetaanalysis AT punekaryogeshsuresh comparativeefficacyofcombinationbronchodilatortherapiesincopdanetworkmetaanalysis |