Cargando…

The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation

Introduction. The mandibular condyle is the most common site of mandibular fracture. Surgical treatment of condylar fractures by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) demands direct visualization of the fracture. This project aimed to investigate the anatomic relationship of the tragus to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barham, H. P., Collister, P., Eusterman, V. D., Terella, A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26421016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/715126
_version_ 1782390481197465600
author Barham, H. P.
Collister, P.
Eusterman, V. D.
Terella, A. M.
author_facet Barham, H. P.
Collister, P.
Eusterman, V. D.
Terella, A. M.
author_sort Barham, H. P.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. The mandibular condyle is the most common site of mandibular fracture. Surgical treatment of condylar fractures by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) demands direct visualization of the fracture. This project aimed to investigate the anatomic relationship of the tragus to the facial nerve and condylar process. Materials and Methods. Twelve fresh hemicadavers heads were used. An extended retromandibular/preauricular approach was utilized, with the incision being based parallel to the posterior edge of the ramus. Measurements were obtained from the tragus to the facial nerve and condylar process. Results. The temporozygomatic division of the facial nerve was encountered during each approach, crossing the mandible at the condylar neck. The mean tissue depth separating the facial nerve from the condylar neck was 5.5 mm (range: 3.5 mm–7 mm, SD 1.2 mm). The upper division of the facial nerve crossed the posterior border of the condylar process on average 2.31 cm (SD 0.10 cm) anterior to the tragus. Conclusions. This study suggests that the temporozygomatic division of the facial nerve will be encountered in most approaches to the condylar process. As visualization of the relationship of the facial nerve to condyle is often limited, recognition that, on average, 5.5 mm of tissue separates condylar process from nerve should help reduce the incidence of facial nerve injury during this procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4573430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45734302015-09-29 The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation Barham, H. P. Collister, P. Eusterman, V. D. Terella, A. M. Int J Otolaryngol Research Article Introduction. The mandibular condyle is the most common site of mandibular fracture. Surgical treatment of condylar fractures by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) demands direct visualization of the fracture. This project aimed to investigate the anatomic relationship of the tragus to the facial nerve and condylar process. Materials and Methods. Twelve fresh hemicadavers heads were used. An extended retromandibular/preauricular approach was utilized, with the incision being based parallel to the posterior edge of the ramus. Measurements were obtained from the tragus to the facial nerve and condylar process. Results. The temporozygomatic division of the facial nerve was encountered during each approach, crossing the mandible at the condylar neck. The mean tissue depth separating the facial nerve from the condylar neck was 5.5 mm (range: 3.5 mm–7 mm, SD 1.2 mm). The upper division of the facial nerve crossed the posterior border of the condylar process on average 2.31 cm (SD 0.10 cm) anterior to the tragus. Conclusions. This study suggests that the temporozygomatic division of the facial nerve will be encountered in most approaches to the condylar process. As visualization of the relationship of the facial nerve to condyle is often limited, recognition that, on average, 5.5 mm of tissue separates condylar process from nerve should help reduce the incidence of facial nerve injury during this procedure. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4573430/ /pubmed/26421016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/715126 Text en Copyright © 2015 H. P. Barham et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barham, H. P.
Collister, P.
Eusterman, V. D.
Terella, A. M.
The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation
title The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation
title_full The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation
title_fullStr The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation
title_short The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation
title_sort relationship of the facial nerve to the condylar process: a cadaveric study with implications for open reduction internal fixation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26421016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/715126
work_keys_str_mv AT barhamhp therelationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation
AT collisterp therelationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation
AT eustermanvd therelationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation
AT terellaam therelationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation
AT barhamhp relationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation
AT collisterp relationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation
AT eustermanvd relationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation
AT terellaam relationshipofthefacialnervetothecondylarprocessacadavericstudywithimplicationsforopenreductioninternalfixation