Cargando…
A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmic disorder world-wide, accounting for 15 % of all strokes. Management of stroke risk in AF is complicated by intolerance of anti-coagulation (AC) therapy and difficulty maintaining therapeutic range in patients treated with warfarin. The left atri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26405642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8 |
_version_ | 1782390555625390080 |
---|---|
author | Srivastava, Mukta C. See, Vincent Y. Dawood, Murtaza Y. Price, Matthew J. |
author_facet | Srivastava, Mukta C. See, Vincent Y. Dawood, Murtaza Y. Price, Matthew J. |
author_sort | Srivastava, Mukta C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmic disorder world-wide, accounting for 15 % of all strokes. Management of stroke risk in AF is complicated by intolerance of anti-coagulation (AC) therapy and difficulty maintaining therapeutic range in patients treated with warfarin. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a source of thrombus in AFrelated thrombo-embolic events and surgical LAA exclusion (LAAO) is commonly performed during cardiac surgery in AF patients. Surgical approaches are limited by a high incidence of incomplete closure with a potential for consequent thrombo-embolic events as well as the morbidity of an open-heart procedure. More recently, percutaneous approaches to LAAO have been developed. The LARIAT device is an epicardial LAA exclusion system that enables percutaneous suture ligation of the LAA via combined, pericardial and trans-septal access. The device has 510k Federal Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for soft-tissue ligation and has been studied in canine models in pre-clinical studies as well as published series of clinical experience with LARIAT LAAO. The history, patient selection, procedural technique and complications of LARIAT LAAO are reviewed here. Additionally, insights and procedural improvements that have been elucidated from clinical series and outcomes from the collective experience are discussed. The LARIAT’s epicardial approach to LAA ligation is unique compared with other percutaneous LAA exclusion devices, however more data regarding device safety and efficacy is needed for the LARIAT to emerge as an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4574041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45740412015-09-24 A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience Srivastava, Mukta C. See, Vincent Y. Dawood, Murtaza Y. Price, Matthew J. Springerplus Review Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmic disorder world-wide, accounting for 15 % of all strokes. Management of stroke risk in AF is complicated by intolerance of anti-coagulation (AC) therapy and difficulty maintaining therapeutic range in patients treated with warfarin. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a source of thrombus in AFrelated thrombo-embolic events and surgical LAA exclusion (LAAO) is commonly performed during cardiac surgery in AF patients. Surgical approaches are limited by a high incidence of incomplete closure with a potential for consequent thrombo-embolic events as well as the morbidity of an open-heart procedure. More recently, percutaneous approaches to LAAO have been developed. The LARIAT device is an epicardial LAA exclusion system that enables percutaneous suture ligation of the LAA via combined, pericardial and trans-septal access. The device has 510k Federal Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for soft-tissue ligation and has been studied in canine models in pre-clinical studies as well as published series of clinical experience with LARIAT LAAO. The history, patient selection, procedural technique and complications of LARIAT LAAO are reviewed here. Additionally, insights and procedural improvements that have been elucidated from clinical series and outcomes from the collective experience are discussed. The LARIAT’s epicardial approach to LAA ligation is unique compared with other percutaneous LAA exclusion devices, however more data regarding device safety and efficacy is needed for the LARIAT to emerge as an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF. Springer International Publishing 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4574041/ /pubmed/26405642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8 Text en © Srivastava et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Srivastava, Mukta C. See, Vincent Y. Dawood, Murtaza Y. Price, Matthew J. A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience |
title | A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience |
title_full | A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience |
title_fullStr | A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience |
title_short | A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience |
title_sort | review of the lariat device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26405642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT srivastavamuktac areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience AT seevincenty areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience AT dawoodmurtazay areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience AT pricematthewj areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience AT srivastavamuktac reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience AT seevincenty reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience AT dawoodmurtazay reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience AT pricematthewj reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience |