Cargando…

A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmic disorder world-wide, accounting for 15 % of all strokes. Management of stroke risk in AF is complicated by intolerance of anti-coagulation (AC) therapy and difficulty maintaining therapeutic range in patients treated with warfarin. The left atri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Mukta C., See, Vincent Y., Dawood, Murtaza Y., Price, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26405642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8
_version_ 1782390555625390080
author Srivastava, Mukta C.
See, Vincent Y.
Dawood, Murtaza Y.
Price, Matthew J.
author_facet Srivastava, Mukta C.
See, Vincent Y.
Dawood, Murtaza Y.
Price, Matthew J.
author_sort Srivastava, Mukta C.
collection PubMed
description Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmic disorder world-wide, accounting for 15 % of all strokes. Management of stroke risk in AF is complicated by intolerance of anti-coagulation (AC) therapy and difficulty maintaining therapeutic range in patients treated with warfarin. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a source of thrombus in AFrelated thrombo-embolic events and surgical LAA exclusion (LAAO) is commonly performed during cardiac surgery in AF patients. Surgical approaches are limited by a high incidence of incomplete closure with a potential for consequent thrombo-embolic events as well as the morbidity of an open-heart procedure. More recently, percutaneous approaches to LAAO have been developed. The LARIAT device is an epicardial LAA exclusion system that enables percutaneous suture ligation of the LAA via combined, pericardial and trans-septal access. The device has 510k Federal Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for soft-tissue ligation and has been studied in canine models in pre-clinical studies as well as published series of clinical experience with LARIAT LAAO. The history, patient selection, procedural technique and complications of LARIAT LAAO are reviewed here. Additionally, insights and procedural improvements that have been elucidated from clinical series and outcomes from the collective experience are discussed. The LARIAT’s epicardial approach to LAA ligation is unique compared with other percutaneous LAA exclusion devices, however more data regarding device safety and efficacy is needed for the LARIAT to emerge as an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4574041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45740412015-09-24 A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience Srivastava, Mukta C. See, Vincent Y. Dawood, Murtaza Y. Price, Matthew J. Springerplus Review Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmic disorder world-wide, accounting for 15 % of all strokes. Management of stroke risk in AF is complicated by intolerance of anti-coagulation (AC) therapy and difficulty maintaining therapeutic range in patients treated with warfarin. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a source of thrombus in AFrelated thrombo-embolic events and surgical LAA exclusion (LAAO) is commonly performed during cardiac surgery in AF patients. Surgical approaches are limited by a high incidence of incomplete closure with a potential for consequent thrombo-embolic events as well as the morbidity of an open-heart procedure. More recently, percutaneous approaches to LAAO have been developed. The LARIAT device is an epicardial LAA exclusion system that enables percutaneous suture ligation of the LAA via combined, pericardial and trans-septal access. The device has 510k Federal Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for soft-tissue ligation and has been studied in canine models in pre-clinical studies as well as published series of clinical experience with LARIAT LAAO. The history, patient selection, procedural technique and complications of LARIAT LAAO are reviewed here. Additionally, insights and procedural improvements that have been elucidated from clinical series and outcomes from the collective experience are discussed. The LARIAT’s epicardial approach to LAA ligation is unique compared with other percutaneous LAA exclusion devices, however more data regarding device safety and efficacy is needed for the LARIAT to emerge as an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF. Springer International Publishing 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4574041/ /pubmed/26405642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8 Text en © Srivastava et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Srivastava, Mukta C.
See, Vincent Y.
Dawood, Murtaza Y.
Price, Matthew J.
A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
title A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
title_full A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
title_fullStr A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
title_full_unstemmed A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
title_short A review of the LARIAT device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
title_sort review of the lariat device: insights from the cumulative clinical experience
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26405642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1289-8
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastavamuktac areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience
AT seevincenty areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience
AT dawoodmurtazay areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience
AT pricematthewj areviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience
AT srivastavamuktac reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience
AT seevincenty reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience
AT dawoodmurtazay reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience
AT pricematthewj reviewofthelariatdeviceinsightsfromthecumulativeclinicalexperience