Cargando…

A comparative study of metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dry mandible with 12 intact premolars was prepared, and was scanned ten times with various types of brackets: American, 3M, Dentaurum, and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalili Kajan, Zahra, Khademi, Jalil, Alizadeh, Ahmad, Babaei Hemmaty, Yasamin, Atrkar Roushan, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389058
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.3.159
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dry mandible with 12 intact premolars was prepared, and was scanned ten times with various types of brackets: American, 3M, Dentaurum, and Masel orthodontic brackets were used, together with either stainless steel (SS) or nickel titanium (NiTi) wires. Subsequently, three different sequences of coronal and axial images were obtained: spin-echo T(1)-weighted images, fast spin-echo T(2)-weighted images, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. In each sequence, the two sequential axial and coronal images with the largest signal-void area were selected. The largest diameters of the signal voids in the direction of the X-, Y-, and Z-axes were then measured twice. Finally, the mean linear values associated with different orthodontic brackets were analyzed using one-way analysis of variation, and the results were compared using the independent t-test to assess whether the use of SS or NiTi wires had a significant effect on the images. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were only observed along the Z-axis among the four different brands of orthodontic brackets with SS wires. A statistically significant difference was observed along all axes among the brackets with NiTi wires. A statistically significant difference was found only along the Z-axis between nickel-free and nickel-containing brackets. CONCLUSION: With respect to all axes, the 3M bracket was associated with smaller signal-void areas. Overall, the 3M and Dentaurum brackets with NiTi wires induced smaller artifacts along all axes than those with SS wires.