Cargando…
Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience
BACKGROUND: Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is technically challenging. New surgical robotic systems are now available and show promising outcomes but were very recently implemented in China. METHODS: Seven patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using the da Vinci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26377929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0671-x |
_version_ | 1782390589525852160 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yang Ji, Wen-Bin Wang, Hong-Guang Luo, Ying Wang, Xian-Qiang Lv, Shao-Cheng Dong, Jia-Hong |
author_facet | Liu, Yang Ji, Wen-Bin Wang, Hong-Guang Luo, Ying Wang, Xian-Qiang Lv, Shao-Cheng Dong, Jia-Hong |
author_sort | Liu, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is technically challenging. New surgical robotic systems are now available and show promising outcomes but were very recently implemented in China. METHODS: Seven patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using the da Vinci Robotic System (RDP) for benign or borderline malignant pancreatic tumors. Spleen preservation rate, blood loss, and operative complications were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 44.6 ± 13.7 years. Surgery was uneventful in all patients, without conversion to laparotomy. The surgical time (including anesthesia induction, robot docking, operation, and postoperative awaking time) was 460 ± 154 min, while the operation time was 368 ± 126 min. Blood losses were 200 ± 110 mL. The minor (Clavien I+II) complication rate was 14.3 %, and the major (Clavien III+IV) complication rate was 14.3 %, including hemorrhage and pancreatic leakage. The spleen preservation rate was 100 %. All complications were successfully managed and cured. Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound examination successfully identified the correct surgical resection margins. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 8.7 ± 6.6 days. No patient had to undergo a second pancreas surgery. Patients were followed up for a median of 6.8 months (range, 6 to 22 months). All patients survived and reported few discomforts. CONCLUSIONS: RDP is feasible and allows the preservation of the splenic vessels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4574193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45741932015-09-19 Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience Liu, Yang Ji, Wen-Bin Wang, Hong-Guang Luo, Ying Wang, Xian-Qiang Lv, Shao-Cheng Dong, Jia-Hong World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is technically challenging. New surgical robotic systems are now available and show promising outcomes but were very recently implemented in China. METHODS: Seven patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using the da Vinci Robotic System (RDP) for benign or borderline malignant pancreatic tumors. Spleen preservation rate, blood loss, and operative complications were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 44.6 ± 13.7 years. Surgery was uneventful in all patients, without conversion to laparotomy. The surgical time (including anesthesia induction, robot docking, operation, and postoperative awaking time) was 460 ± 154 min, while the operation time was 368 ± 126 min. Blood losses were 200 ± 110 mL. The minor (Clavien I+II) complication rate was 14.3 %, and the major (Clavien III+IV) complication rate was 14.3 %, including hemorrhage and pancreatic leakage. The spleen preservation rate was 100 %. All complications were successfully managed and cured. Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound examination successfully identified the correct surgical resection margins. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 8.7 ± 6.6 days. No patient had to undergo a second pancreas surgery. Patients were followed up for a median of 6.8 months (range, 6 to 22 months). All patients survived and reported few discomforts. CONCLUSIONS: RDP is feasible and allows the preservation of the splenic vessels. BioMed Central 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4574193/ /pubmed/26377929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0671-x Text en © Liu et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Yang Ji, Wen-Bin Wang, Hong-Guang Luo, Ying Wang, Xian-Qiang Lv, Shao-Cheng Dong, Jia-Hong Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience |
title | Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience |
title_full | Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience |
title_fullStr | Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience |
title_short | Robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered Chinese experience |
title_sort | robotic spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-centered chinese experience |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26377929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0671-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyang roboticspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomyasinglecenteredchineseexperience AT jiwenbin roboticspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomyasinglecenteredchineseexperience AT wanghongguang roboticspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomyasinglecenteredchineseexperience AT luoying roboticspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomyasinglecenteredchineseexperience AT wangxianqiang roboticspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomyasinglecenteredchineseexperience AT lvshaocheng roboticspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomyasinglecenteredchineseexperience AT dongjiahong roboticspleenpreservinglaparoscopicdistalpancreatectomyasinglecenteredchineseexperience |