Cargando…

Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood

BACKGROUND: Heterochromatin has been reported to be a major silencing compartment during development and differentiation. Prominent heterochromatin compartments are located at the nuclear periphery and inside the nucleus (e.g., pericentric heterochromatin). Whether the position of a gene in relation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jost, K. Laurence, Bertulat, Bianca, Rapp, Alexander, Brero, Alessandro, Hardt, Tanja, Domaing, Petra, Gösele, Claudia, Schulz, Herbert, Hübner, Norbert, Cardoso, M. Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26388944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5
_version_ 1782390628986912768
author Jost, K. Laurence
Bertulat, Bianca
Rapp, Alexander
Brero, Alessandro
Hardt, Tanja
Domaing, Petra
Gösele, Claudia
Schulz, Herbert
Hübner, Norbert
Cardoso, M. Cristina
author_facet Jost, K. Laurence
Bertulat, Bianca
Rapp, Alexander
Brero, Alessandro
Hardt, Tanja
Domaing, Petra
Gösele, Claudia
Schulz, Herbert
Hübner, Norbert
Cardoso, M. Cristina
author_sort Jost, K. Laurence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heterochromatin has been reported to be a major silencing compartment during development and differentiation. Prominent heterochromatin compartments are located at the nuclear periphery and inside the nucleus (e.g., pericentric heterochromatin). Whether the position of a gene in relation to some or all heterochromatin compartments matters remains a matter of debate, which we have addressed in this study. Answering this question demanded solving the technical challenges of 3D measurements and the large-scale morphological changes accompanying cellular differentiation. RESULTS: Here, we investigated the proximity effects of the nuclear periphery and pericentric heterochromatin on gene expression and additionally considered the effect of neighboring genomic features on a gene’s nuclear position. Using a well-established myogenic in vitro differentiation system and a differentiation-independent heterochromatin remodeling system dependent on ectopic MeCP2 expression, we first identified genes with statistically significant expression changes by transcriptional profiling. We identified nuclear gene positions by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization followed by 3D distance measurements toward constitutive and facultative heterochromatin domains. Single-cell-based normalization enabled us to acquire morphologically unbiased data and we finally correlated changes in gene positioning to changes in transcriptional profiles. We found no significant correlation of gene silencing and proximity to constitutive heterochromatin and a rather unexpected inverse correlation of gene activity and position relative to facultative heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. CONCLUSION: In summary, our data question the hypothesis of heterochromatin as a general silencing compartment. Nonetheless, compared to a simulated random distribution, we found that genes are not randomly located within the nucleus. An analysis of neighboring genomic context revealed that gene location within the nucleus is rather dependent on CpG islands, GC content, gene density, and short and long interspersed nuclear elements, collectively known as RIDGE (regions of increased gene expression) properties. Although genes do not move away/to the heterochromatin upon up-/down-regulation, genomic regions with RIDGE properties are generally excluded from peripheral heterochromatin. Hence, we suggest that individual gene activity does not influence gene positioning, but rather chromosomal context matters for sub-nuclear location. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4574441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45744412015-09-19 Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood Jost, K. Laurence Bertulat, Bianca Rapp, Alexander Brero, Alessandro Hardt, Tanja Domaing, Petra Gösele, Claudia Schulz, Herbert Hübner, Norbert Cardoso, M. Cristina Epigenetics Chromatin Research BACKGROUND: Heterochromatin has been reported to be a major silencing compartment during development and differentiation. Prominent heterochromatin compartments are located at the nuclear periphery and inside the nucleus (e.g., pericentric heterochromatin). Whether the position of a gene in relation to some or all heterochromatin compartments matters remains a matter of debate, which we have addressed in this study. Answering this question demanded solving the technical challenges of 3D measurements and the large-scale morphological changes accompanying cellular differentiation. RESULTS: Here, we investigated the proximity effects of the nuclear periphery and pericentric heterochromatin on gene expression and additionally considered the effect of neighboring genomic features on a gene’s nuclear position. Using a well-established myogenic in vitro differentiation system and a differentiation-independent heterochromatin remodeling system dependent on ectopic MeCP2 expression, we first identified genes with statistically significant expression changes by transcriptional profiling. We identified nuclear gene positions by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization followed by 3D distance measurements toward constitutive and facultative heterochromatin domains. Single-cell-based normalization enabled us to acquire morphologically unbiased data and we finally correlated changes in gene positioning to changes in transcriptional profiles. We found no significant correlation of gene silencing and proximity to constitutive heterochromatin and a rather unexpected inverse correlation of gene activity and position relative to facultative heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. CONCLUSION: In summary, our data question the hypothesis of heterochromatin as a general silencing compartment. Nonetheless, compared to a simulated random distribution, we found that genes are not randomly located within the nucleus. An analysis of neighboring genomic context revealed that gene location within the nucleus is rather dependent on CpG islands, GC content, gene density, and short and long interspersed nuclear elements, collectively known as RIDGE (regions of increased gene expression) properties. Although genes do not move away/to the heterochromatin upon up-/down-regulation, genomic regions with RIDGE properties are generally excluded from peripheral heterochromatin. Hence, we suggest that individual gene activity does not influence gene positioning, but rather chromosomal context matters for sub-nuclear location. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4574441/ /pubmed/26388944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5 Text en © Jost et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jost, K. Laurence
Bertulat, Bianca
Rapp, Alexander
Brero, Alessandro
Hardt, Tanja
Domaing, Petra
Gösele, Claudia
Schulz, Herbert
Hübner, Norbert
Cardoso, M. Cristina
Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
title Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
title_full Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
title_fullStr Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
title_full_unstemmed Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
title_short Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
title_sort gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26388944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jostklaurence generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT bertulatbianca generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT rappalexander generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT breroalessandro generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT hardttanja generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT domaingpetra generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT goseleclaudia generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT schulzherbert generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT hubnernorbert generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood
AT cardosomcristina generepositioningwithinthecellnucleusisnotrandomandisdeterminedbyitsgenomicneighborhood