Cargando…

Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND: An Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT) has been developed to describe the diversity of patient populations and variability of nursing care based on nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing outcomes. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of using this NMDS-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranegger, Renate, Hackl, Werner O., Ammenwerth, Elske
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0198-7
_version_ 1782390651686486016
author Ranegger, Renate
Hackl, Werner O.
Ammenwerth, Elske
author_facet Ranegger, Renate
Hackl, Werner O.
Ammenwerth, Elske
author_sort Ranegger, Renate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT) has been developed to describe the diversity of patient populations and variability of nursing care based on nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing outcomes. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of using this NMDS-AT by assessing the availability of data needed for the NMDS-AT in routine nursing documentation, and to assess its reliability and usefulness. METHODS: Data were collected in a general hospital from patient records of 20 patients representing 457 patient days. Availability of needed data was assessed by two raters in a chart review based on an NMDS-AT form. The interrater reliability (n = 20) and intrarater reliability (n = 5) was assessed using Cohen’s kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Usefulness was assessed by verifying whether typical analysis questions can be answered by the documented NMDS-AT data. RESULTS: In the 20 patient records, thirteen nursing diagnoses, 50 nursing interventions, and five nursing outcomes occurred, representing 68 (58.6 %) of the overall 116 data elements of the NMDS-AT. The data were found at different data sources (e.g., electronic nursing record or paper-based fever chart) and in various forms (e.g., standardized or free text). The interrater reliability of the thirteen nursing diagnoses showed kappa values (percentage of agreement) ranging from 0.35 (85 %) to 1.00 (100 %). The 50 nursing interventions showed ICCs ranging from 0.03 to 1.00. All nursing outcomes showed an ICC of 1.00. The intrarater reliability showed 100 % agreement. Performing typical analysis questions showed that the extracted NMDS-AT data are able to answer questions of clinical management, of policy makers, and of nursing science. CONCLUSIONS: The NMDS-AT was found to be feasible: needed data was available in the analysed patient records, data extraction showed good reliability, and typical analysis could be performed and showed interesting results. Before the NMDS-AT can be introduced in healthcare institutions, the following challenges need to be addressed: 1. improve the quality of nursing documentation; 2. reduce fragmentation of documentation; 3. use a standardized nursing classification system; and 4. establish mappings between nursing classification systems and the NMDS-AT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4574574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45745742015-09-19 Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study Ranegger, Renate Hackl, Werner O. Ammenwerth, Elske BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: An Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT) has been developed to describe the diversity of patient populations and variability of nursing care based on nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing outcomes. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of using this NMDS-AT by assessing the availability of data needed for the NMDS-AT in routine nursing documentation, and to assess its reliability and usefulness. METHODS: Data were collected in a general hospital from patient records of 20 patients representing 457 patient days. Availability of needed data was assessed by two raters in a chart review based on an NMDS-AT form. The interrater reliability (n = 20) and intrarater reliability (n = 5) was assessed using Cohen’s kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Usefulness was assessed by verifying whether typical analysis questions can be answered by the documented NMDS-AT data. RESULTS: In the 20 patient records, thirteen nursing diagnoses, 50 nursing interventions, and five nursing outcomes occurred, representing 68 (58.6 %) of the overall 116 data elements of the NMDS-AT. The data were found at different data sources (e.g., electronic nursing record or paper-based fever chart) and in various forms (e.g., standardized or free text). The interrater reliability of the thirteen nursing diagnoses showed kappa values (percentage of agreement) ranging from 0.35 (85 %) to 1.00 (100 %). The 50 nursing interventions showed ICCs ranging from 0.03 to 1.00. All nursing outcomes showed an ICC of 1.00. The intrarater reliability showed 100 % agreement. Performing typical analysis questions showed that the extracted NMDS-AT data are able to answer questions of clinical management, of policy makers, and of nursing science. CONCLUSIONS: The NMDS-AT was found to be feasible: needed data was available in the analysed patient records, data extraction showed good reliability, and typical analysis could be performed and showed interesting results. Before the NMDS-AT can be introduced in healthcare institutions, the following challenges need to be addressed: 1. improve the quality of nursing documentation; 2. reduce fragmentation of documentation; 3. use a standardized nursing classification system; and 4. establish mappings between nursing classification systems and the NMDS-AT. BioMed Central 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4574574/ /pubmed/26384111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0198-7 Text en © Ranegger et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ranegger, Renate
Hackl, Werner O.
Ammenwerth, Elske
Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study
title Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study
title_full Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study
title_short Implementation of the Austrian Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS-AT): A Feasibility Study
title_sort implementation of the austrian nursing minimum data set (nmds-at): a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0198-7
work_keys_str_mv AT raneggerrenate implementationoftheaustriannursingminimumdatasetnmdsatafeasibilitystudy
AT hacklwernero implementationoftheaustriannursingminimumdatasetnmdsatafeasibilitystudy
AT ammenwerthelske implementationoftheaustriannursingminimumdatasetnmdsatafeasibilitystudy