Cargando…
Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire
OBJECTIVES: The use of brief screening tools to identify inactive patients is essential to improve the efficiency of primary care-based physical activity (PA) programs. However, the current employment of short PA questionnaires within the Spanish primary care pathway is unclear. This study evaluated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136870 |
_version_ | 1782390663409565696 |
---|---|
author | Puig-Ribera, Anna Martín-Cantera, Carlos Puigdomenech, Elisa Real, Jordi Romaguera, Montserrat Magdalena-Belio, José Félix Recio-Rodríguez, Jose Ignacio Rodriguez-Martin, Beatriz Arietaleanizbeaskoa, Maria Soledad Repiso–Gento, Irene Garcia-Ortiz, Luis |
author_facet | Puig-Ribera, Anna Martín-Cantera, Carlos Puigdomenech, Elisa Real, Jordi Romaguera, Montserrat Magdalena-Belio, José Félix Recio-Rodríguez, Jose Ignacio Rodriguez-Martin, Beatriz Arietaleanizbeaskoa, Maria Soledad Repiso–Gento, Irene Garcia-Ortiz, Luis |
author_sort | Puig-Ribera, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The use of brief screening tools to identify inactive patients is essential to improve the efficiency of primary care-based physical activity (PA) programs. However, the current employment of short PA questionnaires within the Spanish primary care pathway is unclear. This study evaluated the validity of the Spanish version of a Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool (SBPAAT). METHODS: A validation study was carried out within the EVIDENT project. A convenience sample of patients (n = 1,184; age 58.9±13.7 years; 60.5% female) completed the SBPAAT and the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (7DPAR) and, in addition, wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) for seven consecutive days. Validity was evaluated by measuring agreement, Kappa correlation coefficients, sensitivity and specificity in achieving current PA recommendations with the 7DPAR. Pearson correlation coefficients with the number of daily minutes engaged in moderate and vigorous intensity PA according to the accelerometer were also assessed. Comparison with accelerometer counts, daily minutes engaged in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensity PA, total daily kilocalories, and total PA and leisure time expenditure (METs-hour-week) between the sufficiently and insufficiently active groups identified by SBPAAT were reported. RESULTS: The SBPAAT identified 41.3% sufficiently active (n = 489) and 58.7% insufficiently active (n = 695) patients; it showed moderate validity (k = 0.454, 95% CI: 0.402–0.505) and a specificity and sensitivity of 74.3% and 74.6%, respectively. Validity was fair for identifying daily minutes engaged in moderate (r = 0.215, 95% CI:0.156 to 0.272) and vigorous PA (r = 0.282, 95% CI:0.165 to 0.391). Insufficiently active patients according to the SBPAAT significantly reported fewer counts/minute (-22%), fewer minutes/day of moderate (-11.38) and vigorous PA (-2.69), spent fewer total kilocalories/day (-753), and reported a lower energy cost (METs-hour-week) of physical activities globally (-26.82) and during leisure time (-19.62). CONCLUSIONS: The SBPAAT is a valid tool to identify Spanish-speaking patients who are insufficiently active to achieve health benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4574733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45747332015-09-25 Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire Puig-Ribera, Anna Martín-Cantera, Carlos Puigdomenech, Elisa Real, Jordi Romaguera, Montserrat Magdalena-Belio, José Félix Recio-Rodríguez, Jose Ignacio Rodriguez-Martin, Beatriz Arietaleanizbeaskoa, Maria Soledad Repiso–Gento, Irene Garcia-Ortiz, Luis PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The use of brief screening tools to identify inactive patients is essential to improve the efficiency of primary care-based physical activity (PA) programs. However, the current employment of short PA questionnaires within the Spanish primary care pathway is unclear. This study evaluated the validity of the Spanish version of a Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool (SBPAAT). METHODS: A validation study was carried out within the EVIDENT project. A convenience sample of patients (n = 1,184; age 58.9±13.7 years; 60.5% female) completed the SBPAAT and the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (7DPAR) and, in addition, wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) for seven consecutive days. Validity was evaluated by measuring agreement, Kappa correlation coefficients, sensitivity and specificity in achieving current PA recommendations with the 7DPAR. Pearson correlation coefficients with the number of daily minutes engaged in moderate and vigorous intensity PA according to the accelerometer were also assessed. Comparison with accelerometer counts, daily minutes engaged in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensity PA, total daily kilocalories, and total PA and leisure time expenditure (METs-hour-week) between the sufficiently and insufficiently active groups identified by SBPAAT were reported. RESULTS: The SBPAAT identified 41.3% sufficiently active (n = 489) and 58.7% insufficiently active (n = 695) patients; it showed moderate validity (k = 0.454, 95% CI: 0.402–0.505) and a specificity and sensitivity of 74.3% and 74.6%, respectively. Validity was fair for identifying daily minutes engaged in moderate (r = 0.215, 95% CI:0.156 to 0.272) and vigorous PA (r = 0.282, 95% CI:0.165 to 0.391). Insufficiently active patients according to the SBPAAT significantly reported fewer counts/minute (-22%), fewer minutes/day of moderate (-11.38) and vigorous PA (-2.69), spent fewer total kilocalories/day (-753), and reported a lower energy cost (METs-hour-week) of physical activities globally (-26.82) and during leisure time (-19.62). CONCLUSIONS: The SBPAAT is a valid tool to identify Spanish-speaking patients who are insufficiently active to achieve health benefits. Public Library of Science 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4574733/ /pubmed/26379036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136870 Text en © 2015 Puig-Ribera et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Puig-Ribera, Anna Martín-Cantera, Carlos Puigdomenech, Elisa Real, Jordi Romaguera, Montserrat Magdalena-Belio, José Félix Recio-Rodríguez, Jose Ignacio Rodriguez-Martin, Beatriz Arietaleanizbeaskoa, Maria Soledad Repiso–Gento, Irene Garcia-Ortiz, Luis Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire |
title | Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire |
title_full | Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire |
title_short | Screening Physical Activity in Family Practice: Validity of the Spanish Version of a Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire |
title_sort | screening physical activity in family practice: validity of the spanish version of a brief physical activity questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puigriberaanna screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT martincanteracarlos screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT puigdomenechelisa screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT realjordi screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT romagueramontserrat screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT magdalenabeliojosefelix screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT reciorodriguezjoseignacio screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT rodriguezmartinbeatriz screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT arietaleanizbeaskoamariasoledad screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT repisogentoirene screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT garciaortizluis screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire AT screeningphysicalactivityinfamilypracticevalidityofthespanishversionofabriefphysicalactivityquestionnaire |