Cargando…

Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization

To make an informed decision on renal replacement therapy, patients should receive education about dialysis options in a structured program covering all modalities. Many patients do not receive such education, and there is disparity in the information they receive. This review aims to compile eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van den Bosch, Judith, Warren, D Simone, Rutherford, Peter A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396500
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81284
_version_ 1782390686339825664
author Van den Bosch, Judith
Warren, D Simone
Rutherford, Peter A
author_facet Van den Bosch, Judith
Warren, D Simone
Rutherford, Peter A
author_sort Van den Bosch, Judith
collection PubMed
description To make an informed decision on renal replacement therapy, patients should receive education about dialysis options in a structured program covering all modalities. Many patients do not receive such education, and there is disparity in the information they receive. This review aims to compile evidence on effective components of predialysis education programs as related to modality choice and outcomes. PubMed MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid searches (from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2013) with the main search terms of “predialysis”, “peritoneal dialysis”, “home dialysis”, “education”, “information”, and “decision” were performed. Of the 1,005 articles returned from the initial search, 110 were given full text reviews as they potentially met inclusion criteria (for example, they included adults or predialysis patients, or the details of an education program were reported). Only 29 out of the 110 studies met inclusion criteria. Ten out of 13 studies using a comparative design, showed an increase in home dialysis choice after predialysis education. Descriptions of the educational process varied and included individual and group education, multidisciplinary intervention, and varying duration and frequency of sessions. Problem-solving group sessions seem to be an effective component for enhancing the proportion of home dialysis choice. Evidence is lacking for many components, such as timing and staff competencies. There is a need for a standardized approach to evaluate the effect of predialysis educational interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4574882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45748822015-09-22 Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization Van den Bosch, Judith Warren, D Simone Rutherford, Peter A Patient Prefer Adherence Review To make an informed decision on renal replacement therapy, patients should receive education about dialysis options in a structured program covering all modalities. Many patients do not receive such education, and there is disparity in the information they receive. This review aims to compile evidence on effective components of predialysis education programs as related to modality choice and outcomes. PubMed MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid searches (from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2013) with the main search terms of “predialysis”, “peritoneal dialysis”, “home dialysis”, “education”, “information”, and “decision” were performed. Of the 1,005 articles returned from the initial search, 110 were given full text reviews as they potentially met inclusion criteria (for example, they included adults or predialysis patients, or the details of an education program were reported). Only 29 out of the 110 studies met inclusion criteria. Ten out of 13 studies using a comparative design, showed an increase in home dialysis choice after predialysis education. Descriptions of the educational process varied and included individual and group education, multidisciplinary intervention, and varying duration and frequency of sessions. Problem-solving group sessions seem to be an effective component for enhancing the proportion of home dialysis choice. Evidence is lacking for many components, such as timing and staff competencies. There is a need for a standardized approach to evaluate the effect of predialysis educational interventions. Dove Medical Press 2015-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4574882/ /pubmed/26396500 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81284 Text en © 2015 Van den Bosch et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Van den Bosch, Judith
Warren, D Simone
Rutherford, Peter A
Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization
title Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization
title_full Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization
title_fullStr Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization
title_full_unstemmed Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization
title_short Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization
title_sort review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396500
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81284
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenboschjudith reviewofpredialysiseducationprogramsaneedforstandardization
AT warrendsimone reviewofpredialysiseducationprogramsaneedforstandardization
AT rutherfordpetera reviewofpredialysiseducationprogramsaneedforstandardization