Cargando…

The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function

BACKGROUND: Worsening and improving renal function during acute heart failure have been associated with adverse outcomes but few studies have considered the admission level of renal function upon which these changes are superimposed. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate definition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reid, Ryan, Ezekowitz, Justin A., Brown, Paul M., McAlister, Finlay A., Rowe, Brian H., Braam, Branko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138579
_version_ 1782390729421619200
author Reid, Ryan
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
Brown, Paul M.
McAlister, Finlay A.
Rowe, Brian H.
Braam, Branko
author_facet Reid, Ryan
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
Brown, Paul M.
McAlister, Finlay A.
Rowe, Brian H.
Braam, Branko
author_sort Reid, Ryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Worsening and improving renal function during acute heart failure have been associated with adverse outcomes but few studies have considered the admission level of renal function upon which these changes are superimposed. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate definitions that incorporate both admission renal function and change in renal function. METHODS: 696 patients with acute heart failure with calculable eGFR were classified by admission renal function (Reduced [R, eGFR<45 ml/min] or Preserved [P, eGFR≥45 ml/min]) and change over hospital admission (worsening [WRF]: eGFR ≥20% decline; stable [SRF]; and improving [IRF]: eGFR ≥20% increase). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The prevalence of Pres and Red renal function was 47.8% and 52.2%. The frequency of R-WRF, R-SRF, and R-IRF was 11.4%, 28.7%, and 12.1%, respectively; the incidence of P-WRF, P-SRF, and P-IRF was 5.7%, 35.3%, and 6.8%, respectively. Survival was shorter for patients with R-WRF compared to R-IRF (median survival times 13.9 months (95%CI 7.7–24.9) and 32.5 months (95%CI 18.8–56.1), respectively), resulting in an acceleration factor of 2.3 (p = 0.016). Thus, an increase compared with a decrease in renal function was associated with greater than two times longer survival among patients with Reduced renal function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4575105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45751052015-09-25 The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function Reid, Ryan Ezekowitz, Justin A. Brown, Paul M. McAlister, Finlay A. Rowe, Brian H. Braam, Branko PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Worsening and improving renal function during acute heart failure have been associated with adverse outcomes but few studies have considered the admission level of renal function upon which these changes are superimposed. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate definitions that incorporate both admission renal function and change in renal function. METHODS: 696 patients with acute heart failure with calculable eGFR were classified by admission renal function (Reduced [R, eGFR<45 ml/min] or Preserved [P, eGFR≥45 ml/min]) and change over hospital admission (worsening [WRF]: eGFR ≥20% decline; stable [SRF]; and improving [IRF]: eGFR ≥20% increase). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The prevalence of Pres and Red renal function was 47.8% and 52.2%. The frequency of R-WRF, R-SRF, and R-IRF was 11.4%, 28.7%, and 12.1%, respectively; the incidence of P-WRF, P-SRF, and P-IRF was 5.7%, 35.3%, and 6.8%, respectively. Survival was shorter for patients with R-WRF compared to R-IRF (median survival times 13.9 months (95%CI 7.7–24.9) and 32.5 months (95%CI 18.8–56.1), respectively), resulting in an acceleration factor of 2.3 (p = 0.016). Thus, an increase compared with a decrease in renal function was associated with greater than two times longer survival among patients with Reduced renal function. Public Library of Science 2015-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4575105/ /pubmed/26380982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138579 Text en © 2015 Reid et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reid, Ryan
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
Brown, Paul M.
McAlister, Finlay A.
Rowe, Brian H.
Braam, Branko
The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function
title The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function
title_full The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function
title_fullStr The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function
title_short The Prognostic Importance of Changes in Renal Function during Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Depends on Admission Renal Function
title_sort prognostic importance of changes in renal function during treatment for acute heart failure depends on admission renal function
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138579
work_keys_str_mv AT reidryan theprognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT ezekowitzjustina theprognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT brownpaulm theprognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT mcalisterfinlaya theprognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT rowebrianh theprognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT braambranko theprognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT reidryan prognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT ezekowitzjustina prognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT brownpaulm prognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT mcalisterfinlaya prognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT rowebrianh prognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction
AT braambranko prognosticimportanceofchangesinrenalfunctionduringtreatmentforacuteheartfailuredependsonadmissionrenalfunction