Cargando…
Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have challenged the accuracy of conventional measurements of glenoid version. Variability in the orientation of the scapula from individual anatomical differences and patient positioning, combined with differences in observer measurement practices, have been identified as s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26201674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2207-4 |
_version_ | 1782390765856489472 |
---|---|
author | van de Bunt, Fabian Pearl, Michael L. Lee, Eric K. Peng, Lauren Didomenico, Paul |
author_facet | van de Bunt, Fabian Pearl, Michael L. Lee, Eric K. Peng, Lauren Didomenico, Paul |
author_sort | van de Bunt, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have challenged the accuracy of conventional measurements of glenoid version. Variability in the orientation of the scapula from individual anatomical differences and patient positioning, combined with differences in observer measurement practices, have been identified as sources of variability. The purpose of this study was to explore the utility and reliability of clinically available software that allows manipulation of three-dimensional images in order to bridge the variance between clinical and anatomic version in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty CT scans of normal glenoids of patients who had proximal humerus fractures were measured for version. Four reviewers first measured version in a conventional manner (clinical version), measurements were made again (anatomic version) after employing a protocol for reformatting the CT data to align the coronal and sagittal planes with the superior-inferior axis of the glenoid, and the scapular body, respectively. RESULTS: The average value of clinical retroversion for all reviewers and all subjects was −1.4° (range, −16° to 21°), as compared to −3.2° (range, −21° to 6°) when measured from reformatted images. The mean difference between anatomical and clinical version was 1.9° ± 5.6° but ranged on individual measurements from −13° to 26°. In no instance did all four observers choose the same image slice from the sequence of images. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the variation in glenoid version dependent on scapular orientation previously identified in other studies using scapular models, and presents a clinically accessible protocol to correct for scapular orientation from the patient’s CT data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4575378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45753782015-09-23 Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability van de Bunt, Fabian Pearl, Michael L. Lee, Eric K. Peng, Lauren Didomenico, Paul Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have challenged the accuracy of conventional measurements of glenoid version. Variability in the orientation of the scapula from individual anatomical differences and patient positioning, combined with differences in observer measurement practices, have been identified as sources of variability. The purpose of this study was to explore the utility and reliability of clinically available software that allows manipulation of three-dimensional images in order to bridge the variance between clinical and anatomic version in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty CT scans of normal glenoids of patients who had proximal humerus fractures were measured for version. Four reviewers first measured version in a conventional manner (clinical version), measurements were made again (anatomic version) after employing a protocol for reformatting the CT data to align the coronal and sagittal planes with the superior-inferior axis of the glenoid, and the scapular body, respectively. RESULTS: The average value of clinical retroversion for all reviewers and all subjects was −1.4° (range, −16° to 21°), as compared to −3.2° (range, −21° to 6°) when measured from reformatted images. The mean difference between anatomical and clinical version was 1.9° ± 5.6° but ranged on individual measurements from −13° to 26°. In no instance did all four observers choose the same image slice from the sequence of images. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the variation in glenoid version dependent on scapular orientation previously identified in other studies using scapular models, and presents a clinically accessible protocol to correct for scapular orientation from the patient’s CT data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-23 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4575378/ /pubmed/26201674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2207-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article van de Bunt, Fabian Pearl, Michael L. Lee, Eric K. Peng, Lauren Didomenico, Paul Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability |
title | Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability |
title_full | Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability |
title_fullStr | Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability |
title_full_unstemmed | Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability |
title_short | Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability |
title_sort | glenoid version by ct scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26201674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2207-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandebuntfabian glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability AT pearlmichaell glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability AT leeerick glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability AT penglauren glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability AT didomenicopaul glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability |