Cargando…

Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have challenged the accuracy of conventional measurements of glenoid version. Variability in the orientation of the scapula from individual anatomical differences and patient positioning, combined with differences in observer measurement practices, have been identified as s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Bunt, Fabian, Pearl, Michael L., Lee, Eric K., Peng, Lauren, Didomenico, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26201674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2207-4
_version_ 1782390765856489472
author van de Bunt, Fabian
Pearl, Michael L.
Lee, Eric K.
Peng, Lauren
Didomenico, Paul
author_facet van de Bunt, Fabian
Pearl, Michael L.
Lee, Eric K.
Peng, Lauren
Didomenico, Paul
author_sort van de Bunt, Fabian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have challenged the accuracy of conventional measurements of glenoid version. Variability in the orientation of the scapula from individual anatomical differences and patient positioning, combined with differences in observer measurement practices, have been identified as sources of variability. The purpose of this study was to explore the utility and reliability of clinically available software that allows manipulation of three-dimensional images in order to bridge the variance between clinical and anatomic version in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty CT scans of normal glenoids of patients who had proximal humerus fractures were measured for version. Four reviewers first measured version in a conventional manner (clinical version), measurements were made again (anatomic version) after employing a protocol for reformatting the CT data to align the coronal and sagittal planes with the superior-inferior axis of the glenoid, and the scapular body, respectively. RESULTS: The average value of clinical retroversion for all reviewers and all subjects was −1.4° (range, −16° to 21°), as compared to −3.2° (range, −21° to 6°) when measured from reformatted images. The mean difference between anatomical and clinical version was 1.9° ± 5.6° but ranged on individual measurements from −13° to 26°. In no instance did all four observers choose the same image slice from the sequence of images. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the variation in glenoid version dependent on scapular orientation previously identified in other studies using scapular models, and presents a clinically accessible protocol to correct for scapular orientation from the patient’s CT data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4575378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45753782015-09-23 Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability van de Bunt, Fabian Pearl, Michael L. Lee, Eric K. Peng, Lauren Didomenico, Paul Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have challenged the accuracy of conventional measurements of glenoid version. Variability in the orientation of the scapula from individual anatomical differences and patient positioning, combined with differences in observer measurement practices, have been identified as sources of variability. The purpose of this study was to explore the utility and reliability of clinically available software that allows manipulation of three-dimensional images in order to bridge the variance between clinical and anatomic version in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty CT scans of normal glenoids of patients who had proximal humerus fractures were measured for version. Four reviewers first measured version in a conventional manner (clinical version), measurements were made again (anatomic version) after employing a protocol for reformatting the CT data to align the coronal and sagittal planes with the superior-inferior axis of the glenoid, and the scapular body, respectively. RESULTS: The average value of clinical retroversion for all reviewers and all subjects was −1.4° (range, −16° to 21°), as compared to −3.2° (range, −21° to 6°) when measured from reformatted images. The mean difference between anatomical and clinical version was 1.9° ± 5.6° but ranged on individual measurements from −13° to 26°. In no instance did all four observers choose the same image slice from the sequence of images. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the variation in glenoid version dependent on scapular orientation previously identified in other studies using scapular models, and presents a clinically accessible protocol to correct for scapular orientation from the patient’s CT data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-23 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4575378/ /pubmed/26201674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2207-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Scientific Article
van de Bunt, Fabian
Pearl, Michael L.
Lee, Eric K.
Peng, Lauren
Didomenico, Paul
Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
title Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
title_full Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
title_fullStr Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
title_full_unstemmed Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
title_short Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
title_sort glenoid version by ct scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26201674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2207-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vandebuntfabian glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability
AT pearlmichaell glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability
AT leeerick glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability
AT penglauren glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability
AT didomenicopaul glenoidversionbyctscanananalysisofclinicalmeasurementerrorandintroductionofaprotocoltoreducevariability