Cargando…

Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials

We investigated the effects of indacaterol on cough and phlegm in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a meta-analysis with five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of indacaterol in stable COPD patients. The symptom severity was defined using the St. Georg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jinkyeong, Lee, Jung Su, Rhee, Chinkook, Oh, Yeon-Mok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.10.1453
_version_ 1782390827738202112
author Park, Jinkyeong
Lee, Jung Su
Rhee, Chinkook
Oh, Yeon-Mok
author_facet Park, Jinkyeong
Lee, Jung Su
Rhee, Chinkook
Oh, Yeon-Mok
author_sort Park, Jinkyeong
collection PubMed
description We investigated the effects of indacaterol on cough and phlegm in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a meta-analysis with five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of indacaterol in stable COPD patients. The symptom severity was defined using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). We analyzed patients treated with 150 µg (n = 945) and 300 µg (n = 832) out of 3,325 patients who completed the SGRQ from five RCTs. After a 12-week treatment of 150 µg indacaterol, cough improvement was reported in 36.5% (316/866) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 32.2% (259/804) patients treated with placebo (Relative Ratio [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.29). Phlegm improvement was reported in 31.0% (247/798) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 30.6% (225/736) of patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87-1.18). Dyspnea improvement was reported in 39.5% (324/820) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 31.5% (237/753) patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = 0.001, I(2) = 55.1%). Only dyspnea improvement was significant compared to placebo even at the 300 µg indacaterol dose. Compared to placebo, a 12-week treatment of the long-acting beta-agonist, indacaterol might not have a significant effect on cough or phlegm in stable COPD. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4575934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45759342015-10-01 Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials Park, Jinkyeong Lee, Jung Su Rhee, Chinkook Oh, Yeon-Mok J Korean Med Sci Original Article We investigated the effects of indacaterol on cough and phlegm in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a meta-analysis with five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of indacaterol in stable COPD patients. The symptom severity was defined using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). We analyzed patients treated with 150 µg (n = 945) and 300 µg (n = 832) out of 3,325 patients who completed the SGRQ from five RCTs. After a 12-week treatment of 150 µg indacaterol, cough improvement was reported in 36.5% (316/866) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 32.2% (259/804) patients treated with placebo (Relative Ratio [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.29). Phlegm improvement was reported in 31.0% (247/798) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 30.6% (225/736) of patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87-1.18). Dyspnea improvement was reported in 39.5% (324/820) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 31.5% (237/753) patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = 0.001, I(2) = 55.1%). Only dyspnea improvement was significant compared to placebo even at the 300 µg indacaterol dose. Compared to placebo, a 12-week treatment of the long-acting beta-agonist, indacaterol might not have a significant effect on cough or phlegm in stable COPD. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2015-10 2015-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4575934/ /pubmed/26425042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.10.1453 Text en © 2015 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jinkyeong
Lee, Jung Su
Rhee, Chinkook
Oh, Yeon-Mok
Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
title Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort effect of indacaterol on cough and phlegm in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4575934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.10.1453
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjinkyeong effectofindacateroloncoughandphlegminchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsametaanalysisoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT leejungsu effectofindacateroloncoughandphlegminchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsametaanalysisoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT rheechinkook effectofindacateroloncoughandphlegminchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsametaanalysisoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ohyeonmok effectofindacateroloncoughandphlegminchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatientsametaanalysisoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials