Cargando…
Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26301484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.026 |
_version_ | 1782390859955699712 |
---|---|
author | O'Carroll, Ronan E. Chambers, Julie A. Brownlee, Linda Libby, Gillian Steele, Robert J.C. |
author_facet | O'Carroll, Ronan E. Chambers, Julie A. Brownlee, Linda Libby, Gillian Steele, Robert J.C. |
author_sort | O'Carroll, Ronan E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters, was conducted. A total of 60,000 adults aged 50–74 years from the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised into the following groups: (1) no questionnaire (control), (2) Health Locus of Control questionnaire (HLOC) or (3) HLOC plus AR questionnaire. The primary outcome was return of the guaiac faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The secondary outcomes included intention to return test kit and perceived disgust (ICK). A total of 59,366 people were analysed as allocated (intention-to-treat (ITT)); no overall differences were seen between the treatment groups on FOBT uptake (control: 57.3%, HLOC: 56.9%, AR: 57.4%). In total, 13,645 (34.2%) individuals returned the questionnaires. Analysis of the secondary questionnaire measures showed that AR indirectly affected FOBT uptake via intention, whilst ICK directly affected FOBT uptake over and above intention. The effect of AR on FOBT uptake was also moderated by intention strength: for less-than-strong intenders only, uptake was 4.2% higher in the AR (84.6%) versus the HLOC group (80.4%) (95% CI for difference (2.0, 6.5)). The findings show that psychological concepts including AR and perceived disgust (ICK) are important factors in determining FOBT uptake. However, the AR intervention had no simple effect in the ITT analysis. It can be concluded that, in those with low intentions, exposure to AR may be required to increase FOBT uptake. The current controlled trials are presented at the website www.controlled-trials.com (number: ISRCTN74986452). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4576211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Pergamon |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45762112015-10-26 Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial O'Carroll, Ronan E. Chambers, Julie A. Brownlee, Linda Libby, Gillian Steele, Robert J.C. Soc Sci Med Article Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters, was conducted. A total of 60,000 adults aged 50–74 years from the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised into the following groups: (1) no questionnaire (control), (2) Health Locus of Control questionnaire (HLOC) or (3) HLOC plus AR questionnaire. The primary outcome was return of the guaiac faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The secondary outcomes included intention to return test kit and perceived disgust (ICK). A total of 59,366 people were analysed as allocated (intention-to-treat (ITT)); no overall differences were seen between the treatment groups on FOBT uptake (control: 57.3%, HLOC: 56.9%, AR: 57.4%). In total, 13,645 (34.2%) individuals returned the questionnaires. Analysis of the secondary questionnaire measures showed that AR indirectly affected FOBT uptake via intention, whilst ICK directly affected FOBT uptake over and above intention. The effect of AR on FOBT uptake was also moderated by intention strength: for less-than-strong intenders only, uptake was 4.2% higher in the AR (84.6%) versus the HLOC group (80.4%) (95% CI for difference (2.0, 6.5)). The findings show that psychological concepts including AR and perceived disgust (ICK) are important factors in determining FOBT uptake. However, the AR intervention had no simple effect in the ITT analysis. It can be concluded that, in those with low intentions, exposure to AR may be required to increase FOBT uptake. The current controlled trials are presented at the website www.controlled-trials.com (number: ISRCTN74986452). Pergamon 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4576211/ /pubmed/26301484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.026 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article O'Carroll, Ronan E. Chambers, Julie A. Brownlee, Linda Libby, Gillian Steele, Robert J.C. Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial |
title | Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (artics): a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26301484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ocarrollronane anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chambersjuliea anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brownleelinda anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT libbygillian anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT steelerobertjc anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial |