Cargando…

Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial

Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Carroll, Ronan E., Chambers, Julie A., Brownlee, Linda, Libby, Gillian, Steele, Robert J.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26301484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.026
_version_ 1782390859955699712
author O'Carroll, Ronan E.
Chambers, Julie A.
Brownlee, Linda
Libby, Gillian
Steele, Robert J.C.
author_facet O'Carroll, Ronan E.
Chambers, Julie A.
Brownlee, Linda
Libby, Gillian
Steele, Robert J.C.
author_sort O'Carroll, Ronan E.
collection PubMed
description Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters, was conducted. A total of 60,000 adults aged 50–74 years from the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised into the following groups: (1) no questionnaire (control), (2) Health Locus of Control questionnaire (HLOC) or (3) HLOC plus AR questionnaire. The primary outcome was return of the guaiac faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The secondary outcomes included intention to return test kit and perceived disgust (ICK). A total of 59,366 people were analysed as allocated (intention-to-treat (ITT)); no overall differences were seen between the treatment groups on FOBT uptake (control: 57.3%, HLOC: 56.9%, AR: 57.4%). In total, 13,645 (34.2%) individuals returned the questionnaires. Analysis of the secondary questionnaire measures showed that AR indirectly affected FOBT uptake via intention, whilst ICK directly affected FOBT uptake over and above intention. The effect of AR on FOBT uptake was also moderated by intention strength: for less-than-strong intenders only, uptake was 4.2% higher in the AR (84.6%) versus the HLOC group (80.4%) (95% CI for difference (2.0, 6.5)). The findings show that psychological concepts including AR and perceived disgust (ICK) are important factors in determining FOBT uptake. However, the AR intervention had no simple effect in the ITT analysis. It can be concluded that, in those with low intentions, exposure to AR may be required to increase FOBT uptake. The current controlled trials are presented at the website www.controlled-trials.com (number: ISRCTN74986452).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4576211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pergamon
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45762112015-10-26 Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial O'Carroll, Ronan E. Chambers, Julie A. Brownlee, Linda Libby, Gillian Steele, Robert J.C. Soc Sci Med Article Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters, was conducted. A total of 60,000 adults aged 50–74 years from the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised into the following groups: (1) no questionnaire (control), (2) Health Locus of Control questionnaire (HLOC) or (3) HLOC plus AR questionnaire. The primary outcome was return of the guaiac faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The secondary outcomes included intention to return test kit and perceived disgust (ICK). A total of 59,366 people were analysed as allocated (intention-to-treat (ITT)); no overall differences were seen between the treatment groups on FOBT uptake (control: 57.3%, HLOC: 56.9%, AR: 57.4%). In total, 13,645 (34.2%) individuals returned the questionnaires. Analysis of the secondary questionnaire measures showed that AR indirectly affected FOBT uptake via intention, whilst ICK directly affected FOBT uptake over and above intention. The effect of AR on FOBT uptake was also moderated by intention strength: for less-than-strong intenders only, uptake was 4.2% higher in the AR (84.6%) versus the HLOC group (80.4%) (95% CI for difference (2.0, 6.5)). The findings show that psychological concepts including AR and perceived disgust (ICK) are important factors in determining FOBT uptake. However, the AR intervention had no simple effect in the ITT analysis. It can be concluded that, in those with low intentions, exposure to AR may be required to increase FOBT uptake. The current controlled trials are presented at the website www.controlled-trials.com (number: ISRCTN74986452). Pergamon 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4576211/ /pubmed/26301484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.026 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
O'Carroll, Ronan E.
Chambers, Julie A.
Brownlee, Linda
Libby, Gillian
Steele, Robert J.C.
Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
title Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
title_full Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
title_short Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
title_sort anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (artics): a randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26301484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.026
work_keys_str_mv AT ocarrollronane anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chambersjuliea anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brownleelinda anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT libbygillian anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT steelerobertjc anticipatedregrettoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeningarticsarandomisedcontrolledtrial