Cargando…

Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous developments in the field of assisted reproduction the implantation rate remains low .Recent studies suggested that local injury to endometrium in controlled ovarian hyper stimulation cycle improves implantation rate. Studies have attempted to intervene in the developmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safdarian, Leili, Movahedi, Shohre, Aleyasine, Ashraf, Aghahosaini, Marzie, Fallah, Parvin, Rezaiian, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396577
_version_ 1782390873832554496
author Safdarian, Leili
Movahedi, Shohre
Aleyasine, Ashraf
Aghahosaini, Marzie
Fallah, Parvin
Rezaiian, Zahra
author_facet Safdarian, Leili
Movahedi, Shohre
Aleyasine, Ashraf
Aghahosaini, Marzie
Fallah, Parvin
Rezaiian, Zahra
author_sort Safdarian, Leili
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite numerous developments in the field of assisted reproduction the implantation rate remains low .Recent studies suggested that local injury to endometrium in controlled ovarian hyper stimulation cycle improves implantation rate. Studies have attempted to intervene in the development of endometrium. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was the exploration of the possibility that local injury of the endometrium increases implantation rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this interventional study, 100 good responders to hormone stimulation patients were divided into control group (n=50) and experimental group (n=50) which undergo endometrial biopsy by biopsy catheter )piplle) on day 21 of their previous menstrual cycle with use of contraceptive pills before the IVF-ET treatment. In total, 26 patients were removed from the study because the number of stimulated follicles were below 3, or there was no embryo or there was the risk of OHSS. The remaining patients were 33 in experimental group and 41 in the control group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the age of the patients, duration of infertility and BMI, base line FSH level and responses to hormone stimulation. The rates of embryo implantation, chemical and clinical pregnancy in the experimental group were 4.9%, 18.2% and 12.1% with no significant differences with the control group (6.7%, 19.5%, 17.1%). Cancellation rate was 26%. CONCLUSION: In our study, endometrial biopsy didn’t increase the chances to conceive at the following cycle of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4576429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Research and Clinical Center for Infertility
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45764292015-09-22 Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization Safdarian, Leili Movahedi, Shohre Aleyasine, Ashraf Aghahosaini, Marzie Fallah, Parvin Rezaiian, Zahra Iran J Reprod Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite numerous developments in the field of assisted reproduction the implantation rate remains low .Recent studies suggested that local injury to endometrium in controlled ovarian hyper stimulation cycle improves implantation rate. Studies have attempted to intervene in the development of endometrium. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was the exploration of the possibility that local injury of the endometrium increases implantation rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this interventional study, 100 good responders to hormone stimulation patients were divided into control group (n=50) and experimental group (n=50) which undergo endometrial biopsy by biopsy catheter )piplle) on day 21 of their previous menstrual cycle with use of contraceptive pills before the IVF-ET treatment. In total, 26 patients were removed from the study because the number of stimulated follicles were below 3, or there was no embryo or there was the risk of OHSS. The remaining patients were 33 in experimental group and 41 in the control group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the age of the patients, duration of infertility and BMI, base line FSH level and responses to hormone stimulation. The rates of embryo implantation, chemical and clinical pregnancy in the experimental group were 4.9%, 18.2% and 12.1% with no significant differences with the control group (6.7%, 19.5%, 17.1%). Cancellation rate was 26%. CONCLUSION: In our study, endometrial biopsy didn’t increase the chances to conceive at the following cycle of treatment. Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC4576429/ /pubmed/26396577 Text en
spellingShingle Original Article
Safdarian, Leili
Movahedi, Shohre
Aleyasine, Ashraf
Aghahosaini, Marzie
Fallah, Parvin
Rezaiian, Zahra
Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization
title Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization
title_full Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization
title_fullStr Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization
title_full_unstemmed Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization
title_short Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization
title_sort local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396577
work_keys_str_mv AT safdarianleili localinjurytotheendometriumdoesnotimprovetheimplantationrateingoodresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilization
AT movahedishohre localinjurytotheendometriumdoesnotimprovetheimplantationrateingoodresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilization
AT aleyasineashraf localinjurytotheendometriumdoesnotimprovetheimplantationrateingoodresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilization
AT aghahosainimarzie localinjurytotheendometriumdoesnotimprovetheimplantationrateingoodresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilization
AT fallahparvin localinjurytotheendometriumdoesnotimprovetheimplantationrateingoodresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilization
AT rezaiianzahra localinjurytotheendometriumdoesnotimprovetheimplantationrateingoodresponderpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilization