Cargando…

Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score

INTRODUCTION: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a challenge to diagnose, particularly outside of expert centers with long delays in diagnosis leading to significant burden to patients and caregivers. Although consensus criteria have excellent specificity, there is no standardized way to assess symp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Galvin, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26405688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2015.05.004
_version_ 1782390879863963648
author Galvin, James E.
author_facet Galvin, James E.
author_sort Galvin, James E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a challenge to diagnose, particularly outside of expert centers with long delays in diagnosis leading to significant burden to patients and caregivers. Although consensus criteria have excellent specificity, there is no standardized way to assess symptoms reducing sensitivity. We developed the Lewy body composite risk score (LBCRS) from autopsy-verified cases to improve the ability to detect DLB in clinic and research populations. METHODS: The LBCRS was tested in a consecutive series of 256 patients compared with the clinical dementia rating and gold standard measures of cognition, motor symptoms, function, and behavior. Psychometric properties including floor and ceiling effects; concurrent, construct, and known-groups validity; and internal consistency of the LBCRS were determined. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the ability of LBCRS to differentiate (1) DLB from Alzheimer's disease (AD), (b) DLB from all dementia, and (c) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to DLB from MCI due to AD. The LBCRS was completed independent of the clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Mean LBCRS scores were significantly different between DLB and AD (6.1 ± 2.0 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3, P < .001) and between MCI-DLB versus MCI-AD (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.0 ± 0.8, P < .001). The LBCRS was able to discriminate DLB from other causes of dementia. Using a cutoff score of 3, areas under ROC for DLB versus AD = 0.93 (0.89–0.98) and for MCI-DLB versus MCI-AD = 0.96 (0.91–1.0). DISCUSSION: The LBCRS increases diagnostic probability that Lewy body pathology is contributing to the dementia syndrome and should improve clinical detection and enrollment for clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4576496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45764962016-05-27 Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score Galvin, James E. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Diagnostic Assessment & Prognosis INTRODUCTION: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a challenge to diagnose, particularly outside of expert centers with long delays in diagnosis leading to significant burden to patients and caregivers. Although consensus criteria have excellent specificity, there is no standardized way to assess symptoms reducing sensitivity. We developed the Lewy body composite risk score (LBCRS) from autopsy-verified cases to improve the ability to detect DLB in clinic and research populations. METHODS: The LBCRS was tested in a consecutive series of 256 patients compared with the clinical dementia rating and gold standard measures of cognition, motor symptoms, function, and behavior. Psychometric properties including floor and ceiling effects; concurrent, construct, and known-groups validity; and internal consistency of the LBCRS were determined. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the ability of LBCRS to differentiate (1) DLB from Alzheimer's disease (AD), (b) DLB from all dementia, and (c) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to DLB from MCI due to AD. The LBCRS was completed independent of the clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Mean LBCRS scores were significantly different between DLB and AD (6.1 ± 2.0 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3, P < .001) and between MCI-DLB versus MCI-AD (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.0 ± 0.8, P < .001). The LBCRS was able to discriminate DLB from other causes of dementia. Using a cutoff score of 3, areas under ROC for DLB versus AD = 0.93 (0.89–0.98) and for MCI-DLB versus MCI-AD = 0.96 (0.91–1.0). DISCUSSION: The LBCRS increases diagnostic probability that Lewy body pathology is contributing to the dementia syndrome and should improve clinical detection and enrollment for clinical trials. Elsevier 2015-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4576496/ /pubmed/26405688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2015.05.004 Text en © 2015 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Diagnostic Assessment & Prognosis
Galvin, James E.
Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score
title Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score
title_full Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score
title_fullStr Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score
title_full_unstemmed Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score
title_short Improving the clinical detection of Lewy body dementia with the Lewy body composite risk score
title_sort improving the clinical detection of lewy body dementia with the lewy body composite risk score
topic Diagnostic Assessment & Prognosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26405688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2015.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT galvinjamese improvingtheclinicaldetectionoflewybodydementiawiththelewybodycompositeriskscore