Cargando…

Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study

AIM: To determine the prognostic value of baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. METHODS: Data from 81 DLBCL patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2013 at the University Hospital Center Osijek, Osijek, Croatia, were reviewed. We evaluated diseas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Periša, Vlatka, Zibar, Lada, Sinčić-Petričević, Jasminka, Knezović, Ana, Periša, Igor, Barbić, Jerko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Medical Schools 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2015.56.334
_version_ 1782390892291686400
author Periša, Vlatka
Zibar, Lada
Sinčić-Petričević, Jasminka
Knezović, Ana
Periša, Igor
Barbić, Jerko
author_facet Periša, Vlatka
Zibar, Lada
Sinčić-Petričević, Jasminka
Knezović, Ana
Periša, Igor
Barbić, Jerko
author_sort Periša, Vlatka
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the prognostic value of baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. METHODS: Data from 81 DLBCL patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2013 at the University Hospital Center Osijek, Osijek, Croatia, were reviewed. We evaluated disease outcome, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), and demographic, clinical and laboratory factors affecting outcome. Univariate analysis and Cox regression analysis were used. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 64 years, 29 were men (35.8%). Higher RDW levels (%) were found in patients with advanced Ann Arbor clinical stage (14.94 ± 1.82 vs 13.55 ± 1.54, P = 0.001) and in those with poor response to therapy (14.94 ± 1.82 vs 13.55 ± 1.54, P = 0.001). Patients with RDW>15% (cut-off was calculated by receiver operating characteristics) had significantly worse OS (median [range], 33 months [20-46] vs 74 months [65-82], P < 0.001) and EFS (27 months [15-40] vs 68 months [59-77], P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that RDW>15% was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 3.654, 95% CI 1.128-11.836) and EFS (HR 2.611, 95% CI 1.012-6-739). CONCLUSION: High baseline RDW is an independent prognostic marker of poor outcome in patients with DLBCL. RDW could be an easily available and inexpensive marker for the risk stratification in patients with DLBCL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4576747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Croatian Medical Schools
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45767472015-09-29 Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study Periša, Vlatka Zibar, Lada Sinčić-Petričević, Jasminka Knezović, Ana Periša, Igor Barbić, Jerko Croat Med J Clinical Science AIM: To determine the prognostic value of baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. METHODS: Data from 81 DLBCL patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2013 at the University Hospital Center Osijek, Osijek, Croatia, were reviewed. We evaluated disease outcome, overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), and demographic, clinical and laboratory factors affecting outcome. Univariate analysis and Cox regression analysis were used. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 64 years, 29 were men (35.8%). Higher RDW levels (%) were found in patients with advanced Ann Arbor clinical stage (14.94 ± 1.82 vs 13.55 ± 1.54, P = 0.001) and in those with poor response to therapy (14.94 ± 1.82 vs 13.55 ± 1.54, P = 0.001). Patients with RDW>15% (cut-off was calculated by receiver operating characteristics) had significantly worse OS (median [range], 33 months [20-46] vs 74 months [65-82], P < 0.001) and EFS (27 months [15-40] vs 68 months [59-77], P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that RDW>15% was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 3.654, 95% CI 1.128-11.836) and EFS (HR 2.611, 95% CI 1.012-6-739). CONCLUSION: High baseline RDW is an independent prognostic marker of poor outcome in patients with DLBCL. RDW could be an easily available and inexpensive marker for the risk stratification in patients with DLBCL. Croatian Medical Schools 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4576747/ /pubmed/26321026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2015.56.334 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Periša, Vlatka
Zibar, Lada
Sinčić-Petričević, Jasminka
Knezović, Ana
Periša, Igor
Barbić, Jerko
Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study
title Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study
title_full Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study
title_short Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study
title_sort red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2015.56.334
work_keys_str_mv AT perisavlatka redbloodcelldistributionwidthasasimplenegativeprognosticfactorinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaretrospectivestudy
AT zibarlada redbloodcelldistributionwidthasasimplenegativeprognosticfactorinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaretrospectivestudy
AT sincicpetricevicjasminka redbloodcelldistributionwidthasasimplenegativeprognosticfactorinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaretrospectivestudy
AT knezovicana redbloodcelldistributionwidthasasimplenegativeprognosticfactorinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaretrospectivestudy
AT perisaigor redbloodcelldistributionwidthasasimplenegativeprognosticfactorinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaretrospectivestudy
AT barbicjerko redbloodcelldistributionwidthasasimplenegativeprognosticfactorinpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaretrospectivestudy