Cargando…
Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
The study aimed to investigate the difference of setup errors on different registration in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Thirty nasopharyngeal cancer patients scheduled to undergo intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were prospecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S87159 |
_version_ | 1782390917001379840 |
---|---|
author | Su, Jiqing Chen, Wen Yang, Huiyun Hong, Jidong Zhang, Zijian Yang, Guangzheng Li, Li Wei, Rui |
author_facet | Su, Jiqing Chen, Wen Yang, Huiyun Hong, Jidong Zhang, Zijian Yang, Guangzheng Li, Li Wei, Rui |
author_sort | Su, Jiqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study aimed to investigate the difference of setup errors on different registration in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Thirty nasopharyngeal cancer patients scheduled to undergo intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Each patient had a weekly CBCT before radiation therapy. In the entire study, 201 CBCT scans were obtained. The scans were registered to the planning CT to determine the difference of setup errors on different registration sites. Different registration sites were represented by bony landmarks. Nasal septum and pterygoid process represent head, cervical vertebrae 1–3 represent upper neck, and cervical vertebrae 4–6 represent lower neck. Patient positioning errors were recorded in the right–left (RL), superior–inferior (SI), and anterior–posterior (AP) directions over the course of radiotherapy. Planning target volume margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. In this study, we can make a conclusion that there are setup errors in RL, SI, and AP directions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT. In addition, the head and neck setup error has the difference, with statistical significance, while patient setup error of neck is greater than that of head during the course of radiotherapy. In our institution, we recommend a planning target volume margin of 3.0 mm in RL direction, 1.3 mm in SI direction, and 2.6 mm in AP direction for nasopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing IMRT with weekly CBCT scans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4576892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45768922015-09-22 Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy Su, Jiqing Chen, Wen Yang, Huiyun Hong, Jidong Zhang, Zijian Yang, Guangzheng Li, Li Wei, Rui Onco Targets Ther Original Research The study aimed to investigate the difference of setup errors on different registration in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Thirty nasopharyngeal cancer patients scheduled to undergo intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Each patient had a weekly CBCT before radiation therapy. In the entire study, 201 CBCT scans were obtained. The scans were registered to the planning CT to determine the difference of setup errors on different registration sites. Different registration sites were represented by bony landmarks. Nasal septum and pterygoid process represent head, cervical vertebrae 1–3 represent upper neck, and cervical vertebrae 4–6 represent lower neck. Patient positioning errors were recorded in the right–left (RL), superior–inferior (SI), and anterior–posterior (AP) directions over the course of radiotherapy. Planning target volume margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. In this study, we can make a conclusion that there are setup errors in RL, SI, and AP directions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT. In addition, the head and neck setup error has the difference, with statistical significance, while patient setup error of neck is greater than that of head during the course of radiotherapy. In our institution, we recommend a planning target volume margin of 3.0 mm in RL direction, 1.3 mm in SI direction, and 2.6 mm in AP direction for nasopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing IMRT with weekly CBCT scans. Dove Medical Press 2015-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4576892/ /pubmed/26396530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S87159 Text en © 2015 Su et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Su, Jiqing Chen, Wen Yang, Huiyun Hong, Jidong Zhang, Zijian Yang, Guangzheng Li, Li Wei, Rui Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title | Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_full | Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_short | Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
title_sort | different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S87159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sujiqing differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT chenwen differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT yanghuiyun differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT hongjidong differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT zhangzijian differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT yangguangzheng differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT lili differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy AT weirui differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy |