Cargando…

Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy

The study aimed to investigate the difference of setup errors on different registration in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Thirty nasopharyngeal cancer patients scheduled to undergo intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were prospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Jiqing, Chen, Wen, Yang, Huiyun, Hong, Jidong, Zhang, Zijian, Yang, Guangzheng, Li, Li, Wei, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396530
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S87159
_version_ 1782390917001379840
author Su, Jiqing
Chen, Wen
Yang, Huiyun
Hong, Jidong
Zhang, Zijian
Yang, Guangzheng
Li, Li
Wei, Rui
author_facet Su, Jiqing
Chen, Wen
Yang, Huiyun
Hong, Jidong
Zhang, Zijian
Yang, Guangzheng
Li, Li
Wei, Rui
author_sort Su, Jiqing
collection PubMed
description The study aimed to investigate the difference of setup errors on different registration in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Thirty nasopharyngeal cancer patients scheduled to undergo intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Each patient had a weekly CBCT before radiation therapy. In the entire study, 201 CBCT scans were obtained. The scans were registered to the planning CT to determine the difference of setup errors on different registration sites. Different registration sites were represented by bony landmarks. Nasal septum and pterygoid process represent head, cervical vertebrae 1–3 represent upper neck, and cervical vertebrae 4–6 represent lower neck. Patient positioning errors were recorded in the right–left (RL), superior–inferior (SI), and anterior–posterior (AP) directions over the course of radiotherapy. Planning target volume margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. In this study, we can make a conclusion that there are setup errors in RL, SI, and AP directions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT. In addition, the head and neck setup error has the difference, with statistical significance, while patient setup error of neck is greater than that of head during the course of radiotherapy. In our institution, we recommend a planning target volume margin of 3.0 mm in RL direction, 1.3 mm in SI direction, and 2.6 mm in AP direction for nasopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing IMRT with weekly CBCT scans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4576892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45768922015-09-22 Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy Su, Jiqing Chen, Wen Yang, Huiyun Hong, Jidong Zhang, Zijian Yang, Guangzheng Li, Li Wei, Rui Onco Targets Ther Original Research The study aimed to investigate the difference of setup errors on different registration in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Thirty nasopharyngeal cancer patients scheduled to undergo intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were prospectively enrolled in the study. Each patient had a weekly CBCT before radiation therapy. In the entire study, 201 CBCT scans were obtained. The scans were registered to the planning CT to determine the difference of setup errors on different registration sites. Different registration sites were represented by bony landmarks. Nasal septum and pterygoid process represent head, cervical vertebrae 1–3 represent upper neck, and cervical vertebrae 4–6 represent lower neck. Patient positioning errors were recorded in the right–left (RL), superior–inferior (SI), and anterior–posterior (AP) directions over the course of radiotherapy. Planning target volume margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. In this study, we can make a conclusion that there are setup errors in RL, SI, and AP directions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT. In addition, the head and neck setup error has the difference, with statistical significance, while patient setup error of neck is greater than that of head during the course of radiotherapy. In our institution, we recommend a planning target volume margin of 3.0 mm in RL direction, 1.3 mm in SI direction, and 2.6 mm in AP direction for nasopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing IMRT with weekly CBCT scans. Dove Medical Press 2015-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4576892/ /pubmed/26396530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S87159 Text en © 2015 Su et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Su, Jiqing
Chen, Wen
Yang, Huiyun
Hong, Jidong
Zhang, Zijian
Yang, Guangzheng
Li, Li
Wei, Rui
Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_short Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_sort different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4576892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396530
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S87159
work_keys_str_mv AT sujiqing differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT chenwen differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT yanghuiyun differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT hongjidong differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT zhangzijian differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT yangguangzheng differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT lili differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT weirui differentsetuperrorsassessedbyweeklyconebeamcomputedtomographyondifferentregistrationinnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy