Cargando…

Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results

BACKGROUND: To investigate the diagnostic value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for laryngeal cancers after inadequate CT results. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study comprised 45 patients investigated for primary laryngeal cancer or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Citil, Serdal, Dogan, Serap, Atilgan, Hasan Ikbal, Menzilcioglu, Mehmet Sait, Sahin, Tuna, Abdulrezzak, Ummuhan, Duymus, Mahmut, Ozturk, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445625
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.895041
_version_ 1782390934021865472
author Citil, Serdal
Dogan, Serap
Atilgan, Hasan Ikbal
Menzilcioglu, Mehmet Sait
Sahin, Tuna
Abdulrezzak, Ummuhan
Duymus, Mahmut
Ozturk, Mustafa
author_facet Citil, Serdal
Dogan, Serap
Atilgan, Hasan Ikbal
Menzilcioglu, Mehmet Sait
Sahin, Tuna
Abdulrezzak, Ummuhan
Duymus, Mahmut
Ozturk, Mustafa
author_sort Citil, Serdal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the diagnostic value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for laryngeal cancers after inadequate CT results. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study comprised 45 patients investigated for primary laryngeal cancer or recurrence-residue in which CT was considered inadequate. A mass was found in 20 patients. Dynamic MRI and PET/CT were compared for diagnosis of mass, lymph node involvement, recurrence and residue. The dynamic curves formed in dynamic MRI were investigated for diagnostic contributions. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the dynamic MRI, for supraglottic, glottic and subglottic location, was 100%, 80%, and 92%; 100%, 85%, and 100%, respectively. In PET/CT the sensitivity and specificity were 100% for all of those localizations. For lymph node involvement, the sensitivity of dynamic MRI and PET/CT was 100%, the specificity was 100% and 93%, respectively. For recurrence-residue, the sensitivity and specificity of dynamic MRI were 86% and 67%, respectively, with 100% sensitivity and specificity in PET/CT. The sensitivity of type A curve for detection of malignancy was 40%, and specificity was 100%. When type A and B curves were included, the sensitivity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients investigated for laryngeal cancer in which CT is considered inadequate, dynamic MRI or PET/CT is useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4577024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45770242015-10-06 Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results Citil, Serdal Dogan, Serap Atilgan, Hasan Ikbal Menzilcioglu, Mehmet Sait Sahin, Tuna Abdulrezzak, Ummuhan Duymus, Mahmut Ozturk, Mustafa Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the diagnostic value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for laryngeal cancers after inadequate CT results. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study comprised 45 patients investigated for primary laryngeal cancer or recurrence-residue in which CT was considered inadequate. A mass was found in 20 patients. Dynamic MRI and PET/CT were compared for diagnosis of mass, lymph node involvement, recurrence and residue. The dynamic curves formed in dynamic MRI were investigated for diagnostic contributions. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the dynamic MRI, for supraglottic, glottic and subglottic location, was 100%, 80%, and 92%; 100%, 85%, and 100%, respectively. In PET/CT the sensitivity and specificity were 100% for all of those localizations. For lymph node involvement, the sensitivity of dynamic MRI and PET/CT was 100%, the specificity was 100% and 93%, respectively. For recurrence-residue, the sensitivity and specificity of dynamic MRI were 86% and 67%, respectively, with 100% sensitivity and specificity in PET/CT. The sensitivity of type A curve for detection of malignancy was 40%, and specificity was 100%. When type A and B curves were included, the sensitivity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients investigated for laryngeal cancer in which CT is considered inadequate, dynamic MRI or PET/CT is useful. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4577024/ /pubmed/26445625 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.895041 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2015 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Citil, Serdal
Dogan, Serap
Atilgan, Hasan Ikbal
Menzilcioglu, Mehmet Sait
Sahin, Tuna
Abdulrezzak, Ummuhan
Duymus, Mahmut
Ozturk, Mustafa
Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results
title Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results
title_full Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results
title_fullStr Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results
title_short Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Laryngeal Cancer After Inadequate CT Results
title_sort comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced mri and pet/ct in the evaluation of laryngeal cancer after inadequate ct results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445625
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.895041
work_keys_str_mv AT citilserdal comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults
AT doganserap comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults
AT atilganhasanikbal comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults
AT menzilcioglumehmetsait comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults
AT sahintuna comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults
AT abdulrezzakummuhan comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults
AT duymusmahmut comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults
AT ozturkmustafa comparisonofdynamiccontrastenhancedmriandpetctintheevaluationoflaryngealcancerafterinadequatectresults