Cargando…
Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review
PURPOSE: The accurate diagnosis and classification of dry eye disease (DED) is challenging owing to wide variations in symptoms and lack of a single reliable clinical assessment. In addition, changes and severity of clinical signs often do not correspond to patient-reported symptoms. To better under...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S89700 |
_version_ | 1782390962636455936 |
---|---|
author | Bartlett, Jimmy D Keith, Michael S Sudharshan, Lavanya Snedecor, Sonya J |
author_facet | Bartlett, Jimmy D Keith, Michael S Sudharshan, Lavanya Snedecor, Sonya J |
author_sort | Bartlett, Jimmy D |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The accurate diagnosis and classification of dry eye disease (DED) is challenging owing to wide variations in symptoms and lack of a single reliable clinical assessment. In addition, changes and severity of clinical signs often do not correspond to patient-reported symptoms. To better understand the inconsistencies observed between signs and symptoms, we conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate published studies reporting associations between patient-reported symptoms and clinical signs of DED. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language articles on the association between clinical signs and symptoms of DED up to February 2014 (no lower limit was set). RESULTS: Thirty-four articles were identified that assessed associations between signs and symptoms, among which 33 unique studies were reported. These included 175 individual sign–symptom association analyses. Statistical significance was reported for associations between sign and symptom measures in 21 of 33 (64%) studies, but for only 42 of 175 (24%) individual analyses. Of 175 individual analyses, 148 reported correlation coefficients, of which the majority (129/148; 87%) were between −0.4 and 0.4, indicating low-to-moderate correlation. Of all individual analyses that demonstrated a statistically significant association, one-half (56%) of reported correlation coefficients were in this range. No clear trends were observed in relation to the strength of associations relative to study size, statistical methods, or study region, although results from three studies did suggest that disease severity may be a factor. CONCLUSION: Associations between DED signs and symptoms are low and inconsistent, which may have implications for monitoring the response to treatment, both in the clinic and in clinical trials. Further studies to increase understanding of the etiopathogenesis of DED and to identify the most reliable and relevant measures of disease are needed to enhance clinical assessment of DED and the measurement of response to therapeutic interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4577273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45772732015-09-22 Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review Bartlett, Jimmy D Keith, Michael S Sudharshan, Lavanya Snedecor, Sonya J Clin Ophthalmol Review PURPOSE: The accurate diagnosis and classification of dry eye disease (DED) is challenging owing to wide variations in symptoms and lack of a single reliable clinical assessment. In addition, changes and severity of clinical signs often do not correspond to patient-reported symptoms. To better understand the inconsistencies observed between signs and symptoms, we conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate published studies reporting associations between patient-reported symptoms and clinical signs of DED. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language articles on the association between clinical signs and symptoms of DED up to February 2014 (no lower limit was set). RESULTS: Thirty-four articles were identified that assessed associations between signs and symptoms, among which 33 unique studies were reported. These included 175 individual sign–symptom association analyses. Statistical significance was reported for associations between sign and symptom measures in 21 of 33 (64%) studies, but for only 42 of 175 (24%) individual analyses. Of 175 individual analyses, 148 reported correlation coefficients, of which the majority (129/148; 87%) were between −0.4 and 0.4, indicating low-to-moderate correlation. Of all individual analyses that demonstrated a statistically significant association, one-half (56%) of reported correlation coefficients were in this range. No clear trends were observed in relation to the strength of associations relative to study size, statistical methods, or study region, although results from three studies did suggest that disease severity may be a factor. CONCLUSION: Associations between DED signs and symptoms are low and inconsistent, which may have implications for monitoring the response to treatment, both in the clinic and in clinical trials. Further studies to increase understanding of the etiopathogenesis of DED and to identify the most reliable and relevant measures of disease are needed to enhance clinical assessment of DED and the measurement of response to therapeutic interventions. Dove Medical Press 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4577273/ /pubmed/26396495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S89700 Text en © 2015 Bartlett et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Bartlett, Jimmy D Keith, Michael S Sudharshan, Lavanya Snedecor, Sonya J Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review |
title | Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review |
title_full | Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review |
title_short | Associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review |
title_sort | associations between signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26396495 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S89700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartlettjimmyd associationsbetweensignsandsymptomsofdryeyediseaseasystematicreview AT keithmichaels associationsbetweensignsandsymptomsofdryeyediseaseasystematicreview AT sudharshanlavanya associationsbetweensignsandsymptomsofdryeyediseaseasystematicreview AT snedecorsonyaj associationsbetweensignsandsymptomsofdryeyediseaseasystematicreview |