Cargando…

Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Study Design Validation study of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis. Objective To evaluate and validate the inter- and intraobserver agreement of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging between neurosurgeons and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Clemens, Rao, Vidar, Gulati, Sasha, Kvistad, Kjell A., Nygaard, Øystein P., Lønne, Greger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551651
_version_ 1782390969226756096
author Weber, Clemens
Rao, Vidar
Gulati, Sasha
Kvistad, Kjell A.
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Lønne, Greger
author_facet Weber, Clemens
Rao, Vidar
Gulati, Sasha
Kvistad, Kjell A.
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Lønne, Greger
author_sort Weber, Clemens
collection PubMed
description Study Design Validation study of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis. Objective To evaluate and validate the inter- and intraobserver agreement of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging between neurosurgeons and radiologists. Methods Two neurosurgeons and two radiologists independently assessed the morphological grading of lumbar spinal stenosis on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging of 84 patients. Inter- and intrarater agreements were calculated by comparing the observers' evaluations level to level on the grading method. The results of both clinicians were compared with the assessment of both radiologists. Results On axial magnetic resonance images, 189 lumbar disk levels were evaluated for the grade of stenosis. The interobserver agreement between the clinicians was substantial. The interobserver agreement between clinician 1 and both radiologists was substantial, and it was moderate between clinician 2 and both radiologists. The clinicians' intraobserver agreement was almost perfect, and the radiologists' intraobserver agreement was substantial. Conclusions The interobserver agreement of this morphological grading for lumbar spinal stenosis was high between both the clinicians and radiologists, whereas the intraobserver agreement was almost perfect. Experienced clinicians may safely evaluate lumbar magnetic resonance images using this morphological grading for central lumbar spinal stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4577324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45773242015-10-01 Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Weber, Clemens Rao, Vidar Gulati, Sasha Kvistad, Kjell A. Nygaard, Øystein P. Lønne, Greger Global Spine J Article Study Design Validation study of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis. Objective To evaluate and validate the inter- and intraobserver agreement of a morphological grading system for central lumbar spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging between neurosurgeons and radiologists. Methods Two neurosurgeons and two radiologists independently assessed the morphological grading of lumbar spinal stenosis on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging of 84 patients. Inter- and intrarater agreements were calculated by comparing the observers' evaluations level to level on the grading method. The results of both clinicians were compared with the assessment of both radiologists. Results On axial magnetic resonance images, 189 lumbar disk levels were evaluated for the grade of stenosis. The interobserver agreement between the clinicians was substantial. The interobserver agreement between clinician 1 and both radiologists was substantial, and it was moderate between clinician 2 and both radiologists. The clinicians' intraobserver agreement was almost perfect, and the radiologists' intraobserver agreement was substantial. Conclusions The interobserver agreement of this morphological grading for lumbar spinal stenosis was high between both the clinicians and radiologists, whereas the intraobserver agreement was almost perfect. Experienced clinicians may safely evaluate lumbar magnetic resonance images using this morphological grading for central lumbar spinal stenosis. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-05-06 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4577324/ /pubmed/26430595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551651 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Weber, Clemens
Rao, Vidar
Gulati, Sasha
Kvistad, Kjell A.
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Lønne, Greger
Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of Morphological Grading for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort inter- and intraobserver agreement of morphological grading for central lumbar spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551651
work_keys_str_mv AT weberclemens interandintraobserveragreementofmorphologicalgradingforcentrallumbarspinalstenosisonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT raovidar interandintraobserveragreementofmorphologicalgradingforcentrallumbarspinalstenosisonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT gulatisasha interandintraobserveragreementofmorphologicalgradingforcentrallumbarspinalstenosisonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kvistadkjella interandintraobserveragreementofmorphologicalgradingforcentrallumbarspinalstenosisonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT nygaardøysteinp interandintraobserveragreementofmorphologicalgradingforcentrallumbarspinalstenosisonmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lønnegreger interandintraobserveragreementofmorphologicalgradingforcentrallumbarspinalstenosisonmagneticresonanceimaging