Cargando…

Gleason score and tumor laterality in radical prostatectomy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a comparative study

We aimed to compare Gleason score and tumor laterality between transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSBX) and radical prostatectomy (RP). Some factors that could cause a discrepancy in results between these two procedures were also evaluated. Among the 318 cases reviewed, 191 case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pereira, Renan A, Costa, Roberto S, Muglia, Valdair F, Silva, Fábio França, Lajes, Joyce S, Dos Reis, Rodolfo B, Silva, Gyl EB
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25652629 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.146970

Ejemplares similares

The prevalence and risk factors of upgrading of Gleason grade group between transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
por: Promsen, Worapong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Histopathological Ratios to Predict Gleason Score Agreement between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy
por: Fiorentino, Vincenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch
por: Bai, W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer
por: Kayano, Paulo Priante, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
por: Renshaw, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Predictive Factors and Oncologic Outcome of Downgrade to Pathologic Gleason Score 6–7 after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 8–10
por: Chung, Doo Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Leng, Yi-Hsueh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Higher Prostate Weight Is Inversely Associated with Gleason Score Upgrading in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
por: Reis, Leonardo Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Re: Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer
por: Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience
por: Nayyar, Rishi, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
por: Milonas, Daimantas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reproducibility and interobserver agreement of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: focus on imaging features
por: Vilaseca, Richard Mast, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Increased fatty acid synthase expression in prostate biopsy cores predicts higher Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen
por: Hamada, Shinsuke, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Predicting Gleason sum upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: a new nomogram and its internal validation
por: Wang, Xiaochuan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system
por: Alqahtani, Saeed, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
por: Geybels, Milan S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
por: Li, Jiakun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Does the Time From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Clinical T1c Prostate Cancer?
por: Eroglu, Muzaffer, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Erratum: Increased fatty acid synthase expression in prostate biopsy cores predicts higher Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen
por: Hamada, Shinsuke, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Factors effective on survival after radical prostatectomy: To what extent is pre-operative biopsy Gleason scoring is confident in predicting the prognosis?
por: Açıkgöz, Onur, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Rührup, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The Association of Fatty Acid Levels and Gleason Grade among Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Zhao, Zhiguo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Importance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictive factor for concordance between the Gleason scores of prostate biopsies and RADICAL prostatectomy specimens
por: de Lima, Nelson Gianni, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry – Victoria
por: Evans, Sue M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
por: Liu, Hailang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
por: Kamecki, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with a Gleason score of 6 in transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy
por: Emekli, Emre, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Long-Term Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients with Pathologic Gleason 8–10 Disease
por: Lewinshtein, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
por: Zhang, Baoling, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prediction model of gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy based on a bayesian network
por: Wang, Guipeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
por: Yang, Rong, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Nomograms for predicting Gleason upgrading in a contemporary Chinese cohort receiving radical prostatectomy after extended prostate biopsy: development and internal validation
por: He, Biming, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

From Cognitive MR-Targeted Fusion Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictors of Gleason Grade Group Upgrading in a Chinese Cohort
por: Yan, Huaqing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Editorial Comment: Overall survival prediction in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with radium-223
por: dos Reis, Rodolfo Borges, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The imaging and pathological features of a mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney: a case report
por: Lima, Marcela Sampaio, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Gene expression signature of Gleason score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in a radical prostatectomy cohort
por: Jhun, Min A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_fg870oequuts1ahs7348s04m0m