Cargando…

UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of displaced, extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. These injuries are difficult to manage due to limited soft tissue cover, poor vascularity of the area and proximity to the ankle joint. Surgical treatment options are expanding and include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Achten, Juul, Parsons, Nicholas R, McGuinness, Katie R, Petrou, Stavros, Lamb, Sarah E, Costa, Matthew L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009162
_version_ 1782391036080816128
author Achten, Juul
Parsons, Nicholas R
McGuinness, Katie R
Petrou, Stavros
Lamb, Sarah E
Costa, Matthew L
author_facet Achten, Juul
Parsons, Nicholas R
McGuinness, Katie R
Petrou, Stavros
Lamb, Sarah E
Costa, Matthew L
author_sort Achten, Juul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The treatment of displaced, extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. These injuries are difficult to manage due to limited soft tissue cover, poor vascularity of the area and proximity to the ankle joint. Surgical treatment options are expanding and include locked intramedullary nails, plate and screw fixation and external fixator systems. The nail and plate options are most commonly used in the UK, but controversy exists over which treatment is most clinically and cost-effective. In this multicentre randomised controlled trial we aim to assess ratings of disability 6 months postinjury in patients who have sustained a distal tibia fracture treated with either an intramedullary nail or plate and locking screw fixation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adult patients presenting at trial centres with an acute fracture of the distal tibia will be considered for inclusion. A total of 320 patients will provide 90% power to detect a difference of 8 points in Disability Rating Index (DRI) score at 6 months at the 5% level. The randomisation sequence is stratified by trial centre and age, and administered via web-based service with 1:1 treatment allocation. Baseline demographic and pre-injury functional data and radiographs will be collected using the DRI, Olerud and Molander, and EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire. Clinical assessment, early complications and radiographs will be recorded at 6–8 weeks. Functional outcome, health-related quality of life and resource use will be collected at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The main analysis will investigate differences in DRI 6 months postsurgery, between the two treatment groups, on an intention-to-treat basis. Tests will be two-sided and considered to provide evidence for a significant difference if p values are <0.05. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: NRES Committee West-Midlands, 6/11/2012 (ref:12/WM/0340). The results of the trial will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99771224.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4577877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45778772015-10-02 UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia Achten, Juul Parsons, Nicholas R McGuinness, Katie R Petrou, Stavros Lamb, Sarah E Costa, Matthew L BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: The treatment of displaced, extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. These injuries are difficult to manage due to limited soft tissue cover, poor vascularity of the area and proximity to the ankle joint. Surgical treatment options are expanding and include locked intramedullary nails, plate and screw fixation and external fixator systems. The nail and plate options are most commonly used in the UK, but controversy exists over which treatment is most clinically and cost-effective. In this multicentre randomised controlled trial we aim to assess ratings of disability 6 months postinjury in patients who have sustained a distal tibia fracture treated with either an intramedullary nail or plate and locking screw fixation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adult patients presenting at trial centres with an acute fracture of the distal tibia will be considered for inclusion. A total of 320 patients will provide 90% power to detect a difference of 8 points in Disability Rating Index (DRI) score at 6 months at the 5% level. The randomisation sequence is stratified by trial centre and age, and administered via web-based service with 1:1 treatment allocation. Baseline demographic and pre-injury functional data and radiographs will be collected using the DRI, Olerud and Molander, and EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire. Clinical assessment, early complications and radiographs will be recorded at 6–8 weeks. Functional outcome, health-related quality of life and resource use will be collected at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The main analysis will investigate differences in DRI 6 months postsurgery, between the two treatment groups, on an intention-to-treat basis. Tests will be two-sided and considered to provide evidence for a significant difference if p values are <0.05. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: NRES Committee West-Midlands, 6/11/2012 (ref:12/WM/0340). The results of the trial will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99771224. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4577877/ /pubmed/26384729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009162 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Achten, Juul
Parsons, Nicholas R
McGuinness, Katie R
Petrou, Stavros
Lamb, Sarah E
Costa, Matthew L
UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
title UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
title_full UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
title_fullStr UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
title_full_unstemmed UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
title_short UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
title_sort uk fixation of distal tibia fractures (uk fixdt): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26384729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009162
work_keys_str_mv AT achtenjuul ukfixationofdistaltibiafracturesukfixdtprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationinthetreatmentofadultpatientswithadisplacedfractureofthedistaltibia
AT parsonsnicholasr ukfixationofdistaltibiafracturesukfixdtprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationinthetreatmentofadultpatientswithadisplacedfractureofthedistaltibia
AT mcguinnesskatier ukfixationofdistaltibiafracturesukfixdtprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationinthetreatmentofadultpatientswithadisplacedfractureofthedistaltibia
AT petroustavros ukfixationofdistaltibiafracturesukfixdtprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationinthetreatmentofadultpatientswithadisplacedfractureofthedistaltibia
AT lambsarahe ukfixationofdistaltibiafracturesukfixdtprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationinthetreatmentofadultpatientswithadisplacedfractureofthedistaltibia
AT costamatthewl ukfixationofdistaltibiafracturesukfixdtprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoflockingplatefixationversusintramedullarynailfixationinthetreatmentofadultpatientswithadisplacedfractureofthedistaltibia