Cargando…

Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: It is estimated that 35–40% of patients with cancer experience distress at some stage during their illness. Distress may affect functioning, capacity to cope, treatment compliance, quality of life and survival of patients with cancer. Best practice clinical guidelines recommend routine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarter, Kristen, Britton, Ben, Baker, Amanda, Halpin, Sean, Beck, Alison, Carter, Gregory, Wratten, Chris, Bauer, Judy, Booth, Debbie, Forbes, Erin, Wolfenden, Luke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008277
_version_ 1782391037508976640
author McCarter, Kristen
Britton, Ben
Baker, Amanda
Halpin, Sean
Beck, Alison
Carter, Gregory
Wratten, Chris
Bauer, Judy
Booth, Debbie
Forbes, Erin
Wolfenden, Luke
author_facet McCarter, Kristen
Britton, Ben
Baker, Amanda
Halpin, Sean
Beck, Alison
Carter, Gregory
Wratten, Chris
Bauer, Judy
Booth, Debbie
Forbes, Erin
Wolfenden, Luke
author_sort McCarter, Kristen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It is estimated that 35–40% of patients with cancer experience distress at some stage during their illness. Distress may affect functioning, capacity to cope, treatment compliance, quality of life and survival of patients with cancer. Best practice clinical guidelines recommend routine psychosocial distress screening and referral for further assessment and/or psychosocial support for patients with cancer. However, evidence suggests this care is not provided consistently. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed our methods following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The review is registered with PROSPERO and any amendments to the protocol will be tracked. The primary aim of this systematic review is to examine the impact of interventions delivered in healthcare settings that are aimed at (1) improving routine screening of patients for psychosocial distress and (2) referral of distressed patients with cancer for further assessment and/or psychosocial support. The effectiveness of such interventions in reducing psychosocial distress, and any unintended adverse effect of the intervention will also be assessed in patients with cancer. Data sources will include the bibliographic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Eligible studies must compare an intervention (or two or more interventions) in a healthcare setting to improve the rate of screening for psychosocial distress and/or referral for further assessment and/or psychosocial support for patients with cancer with no intervention or ‘usual’ practice. Two investigators will independently review titles and abstracts, followed by full article reviews and data extraction. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus and if necessary, a third reviewer. Where studies are sufficiently homogenous, trial data will be pooled and meta-analyses performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings of this study will be disseminated widely via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD4 2015017518.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4577928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45779282015-10-02 Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol McCarter, Kristen Britton, Ben Baker, Amanda Halpin, Sean Beck, Alison Carter, Gregory Wratten, Chris Bauer, Judy Booth, Debbie Forbes, Erin Wolfenden, Luke BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: It is estimated that 35–40% of patients with cancer experience distress at some stage during their illness. Distress may affect functioning, capacity to cope, treatment compliance, quality of life and survival of patients with cancer. Best practice clinical guidelines recommend routine psychosocial distress screening and referral for further assessment and/or psychosocial support for patients with cancer. However, evidence suggests this care is not provided consistently. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed our methods following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The review is registered with PROSPERO and any amendments to the protocol will be tracked. The primary aim of this systematic review is to examine the impact of interventions delivered in healthcare settings that are aimed at (1) improving routine screening of patients for psychosocial distress and (2) referral of distressed patients with cancer for further assessment and/or psychosocial support. The effectiveness of such interventions in reducing psychosocial distress, and any unintended adverse effect of the intervention will also be assessed in patients with cancer. Data sources will include the bibliographic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Eligible studies must compare an intervention (or two or more interventions) in a healthcare setting to improve the rate of screening for psychosocial distress and/or referral for further assessment and/or psychosocial support for patients with cancer with no intervention or ‘usual’ practice. Two investigators will independently review titles and abstracts, followed by full article reviews and data extraction. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus and if necessary, a third reviewer. Where studies are sufficiently homogenous, trial data will be pooled and meta-analyses performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. The findings of this study will be disseminated widely via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD4 2015017518. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4577928/ /pubmed/26391631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008277 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
McCarter, Kristen
Britton, Ben
Baker, Amanda
Halpin, Sean
Beck, Alison
Carter, Gregory
Wratten, Chris
Bauer, Judy
Booth, Debbie
Forbes, Erin
Wolfenden, Luke
Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
title Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
title_full Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
title_short Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
title_sort interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for distress: systematic review protocol
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008277
work_keys_str_mv AT mccarterkristen interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT brittonben interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT bakeramanda interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT halpinsean interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT beckalison interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT cartergregory interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT wrattenchris interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT bauerjudy interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT boothdebbie interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT forbeserin interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol
AT wolfendenluke interventionstoimprovescreeningandappropriatereferralofpatientswithcancerfordistresssystematicreviewprotocol