Cargando…

Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated the measurement properties of current self-report physical activity questionnaires (SRPAQs) completed within healthy adult populations. DESIGN: Two reviewers independently searched seven electronic databases and hand searched for articles investigating mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silsbury, Zoë, Goldsmith, Robert, Rushton, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26373402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008430
_version_ 1782391038441160704
author Silsbury, Zoë
Goldsmith, Robert
Rushton, Alison
author_facet Silsbury, Zoë
Goldsmith, Robert
Rushton, Alison
author_sort Silsbury, Zoë
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated the measurement properties of current self-report physical activity questionnaires (SRPAQs) completed within healthy adult populations. DESIGN: Two reviewers independently searched seven electronic databases and hand searched for articles investigating measurement properties of a SRPAQ evaluating physical activity over the previous 6 months. Articles published from 1 May 2001 to 4 December 2014 were systematically screened and eligible studies were not limited to English language sources. Articles investigating specific race, gender or socioeconomic populations were excluded. RESULTS: 10 studies investigating 10 SRPAQs were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and ranged from ‘poor’ to ‘good’. The Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaires and Physical Activity Assessment Tool demonstrated good/excellent test–retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (ICC)=0.76, p<0.0001; r=0.627–0.91; r=0.618, p<0.001, respectively), but variable criterion validity (r=0.67, p<0.0001; r=−0.02–0.43; r=0.392, p<0.01, respectively). The single-item measure showed significant criterion validity against an accelerometer (for moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) k=0.23, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.41; and physical activity ≥10 min bouts 0.39 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.64). Construct validity of the six-point scale and Human Activity Profile varied significantly with age, marital status and presence of comorbidities (p<0.05, <0.01, <0.000 and p<0.05, <0.05, <0.000, respectively). The 1 week Godlin-Shephard recall demonstrated ‘moderate’ validity with the gold standard measure of accelerometry (r=0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Inconclusive evidence exists. Further investigation of criterion validity of the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire is required, as it demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability. PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42012002484.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4577932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45779322015-10-02 Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations Silsbury, Zoë Goldsmith, Robert Rushton, Alison BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated the measurement properties of current self-report physical activity questionnaires (SRPAQs) completed within healthy adult populations. DESIGN: Two reviewers independently searched seven electronic databases and hand searched for articles investigating measurement properties of a SRPAQ evaluating physical activity over the previous 6 months. Articles published from 1 May 2001 to 4 December 2014 were systematically screened and eligible studies were not limited to English language sources. Articles investigating specific race, gender or socioeconomic populations were excluded. RESULTS: 10 studies investigating 10 SRPAQs were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and ranged from ‘poor’ to ‘good’. The Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaires and Physical Activity Assessment Tool demonstrated good/excellent test–retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (ICC)=0.76, p<0.0001; r=0.627–0.91; r=0.618, p<0.001, respectively), but variable criterion validity (r=0.67, p<0.0001; r=−0.02–0.43; r=0.392, p<0.01, respectively). The single-item measure showed significant criterion validity against an accelerometer (for moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) k=0.23, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.41; and physical activity ≥10 min bouts 0.39 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.64). Construct validity of the six-point scale and Human Activity Profile varied significantly with age, marital status and presence of comorbidities (p<0.05, <0.01, <0.000 and p<0.05, <0.05, <0.000, respectively). The 1 week Godlin-Shephard recall demonstrated ‘moderate’ validity with the gold standard measure of accelerometry (r=0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Inconclusive evidence exists. Further investigation of criterion validity of the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire is required, as it demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability. PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42012002484. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4577932/ /pubmed/26373402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008430 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Silsbury, Zoë
Goldsmith, Robert
Rushton, Alison
Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations
title Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations
title_full Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations
title_fullStr Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations
title_short Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations
title_sort systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26373402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008430
work_keys_str_mv AT silsburyzoe systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofselfreportphysicalactivityquestionnairesinhealthyadultpopulations
AT goldsmithrobert systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofselfreportphysicalactivityquestionnairesinhealthyadultpopulations
AT rushtonalison systematicreviewofthemeasurementpropertiesofselfreportphysicalactivityquestionnairesinhealthyadultpopulations