Cargando…
Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?
BACKGROUND: The requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy for gallbladder-related symptoms,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Association of Internal Medicine
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11855156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.4.254 |
_version_ | 1782391059322503168 |
---|---|
author | Kwon, Soon Kil Lee, Byung Seok Kim, Nam Jae Lee, Heon Young Chae, Hee Bok Youn, Sei Jin Park, Seon Mee |
author_facet | Kwon, Soon Kil Lee, Byung Seok Kim, Nam Jae Lee, Heon Young Chae, Hee Bok Youn, Sei Jin Park, Seon Mee |
author_sort | Kwon, Soon Kil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy for gallbladder-related symptoms, and to identify the patients who develop symptoms after the endoscopic removal of CBD stones. METHODS: Of 241 patients with gallbladder in situ following endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD, 146 patients (78 men and 68 women; mean age 69±13 years, range 20–93) with a follow-up time of more than three months without elective cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study. Fifty-nine patients had gallbladder stones (single stones in 27 and multiple stones in 32) and 87 patients had gallbladder in situ without stones. The time from entry to the occurrences of death or cholecystectomy was evaluated retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with these events. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 24.1±18.0 months (range 3–70 months). During follow-up, seven patients (4.8%) underwent cholecystectomy, on average 18.4 months after CBD stone removal, as the result of acute cholecystitis in four cases, biliary pain in two cases and acute pancreatitis in one case. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in four patients and open cholecystectomy in three patients. Post-operative morbidity occurred in two patients, with improvement after conservative management. Nine patients (6.2%) died as the result of unrelated biliary disease. Age, sex, presence of gallbladder stones, multiplicity of gallbladder stones and underlying disease did not correlate with subsequent cholecystectomy by Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Elective cholecystectomy is not warranted in patients with bile duct stones when the common duct can be cleared of stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy. We could not find any clinical predictors of further symptoms or complications arising from the retained gallbladder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4578061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | Korean Association of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45780612015-10-02 Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? Kwon, Soon Kil Lee, Byung Seok Kim, Nam Jae Lee, Heon Young Chae, Hee Bok Youn, Sei Jin Park, Seon Mee Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy for gallbladder-related symptoms, and to identify the patients who develop symptoms after the endoscopic removal of CBD stones. METHODS: Of 241 patients with gallbladder in situ following endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD, 146 patients (78 men and 68 women; mean age 69±13 years, range 20–93) with a follow-up time of more than three months without elective cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study. Fifty-nine patients had gallbladder stones (single stones in 27 and multiple stones in 32) and 87 patients had gallbladder in situ without stones. The time from entry to the occurrences of death or cholecystectomy was evaluated retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with these events. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 24.1±18.0 months (range 3–70 months). During follow-up, seven patients (4.8%) underwent cholecystectomy, on average 18.4 months after CBD stone removal, as the result of acute cholecystitis in four cases, biliary pain in two cases and acute pancreatitis in one case. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in four patients and open cholecystectomy in three patients. Post-operative morbidity occurred in two patients, with improvement after conservative management. Nine patients (6.2%) died as the result of unrelated biliary disease. Age, sex, presence of gallbladder stones, multiplicity of gallbladder stones and underlying disease did not correlate with subsequent cholecystectomy by Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Elective cholecystectomy is not warranted in patients with bile duct stones when the common duct can be cleared of stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy. We could not find any clinical predictors of further symptoms or complications arising from the retained gallbladder. Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2001-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4578061/ /pubmed/11855156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.4.254 Text en Copyright © 2001 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kwon, Soon Kil Lee, Byung Seok Kim, Nam Jae Lee, Heon Young Chae, Hee Bok Youn, Sei Jin Park, Seon Mee Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? |
title | Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? |
title_full | Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? |
title_fullStr | Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? |
title_short | Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? |
title_sort | is cholecystectomy necessary after ercp for bile duct stones in patients with gallbladder in situ? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11855156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.4.254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kwonsoonkil ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu AT leebyungseok ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu AT kimnamjae ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu AT leeheonyoung ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu AT chaeheebok ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu AT younseijin ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu AT parkseonmee ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu |