Cargando…

Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?

BACKGROUND: The requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy for gallbladder-related symptoms,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Soon Kil, Lee, Byung Seok, Kim, Nam Jae, Lee, Heon Young, Chae, Hee Bok, Youn, Sei Jin, Park, Seon Mee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11855156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.4.254
_version_ 1782391059322503168
author Kwon, Soon Kil
Lee, Byung Seok
Kim, Nam Jae
Lee, Heon Young
Chae, Hee Bok
Youn, Sei Jin
Park, Seon Mee
author_facet Kwon, Soon Kil
Lee, Byung Seok
Kim, Nam Jae
Lee, Heon Young
Chae, Hee Bok
Youn, Sei Jin
Park, Seon Mee
author_sort Kwon, Soon Kil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy for gallbladder-related symptoms, and to identify the patients who develop symptoms after the endoscopic removal of CBD stones. METHODS: Of 241 patients with gallbladder in situ following endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD, 146 patients (78 men and 68 women; mean age 69±13 years, range 20–93) with a follow-up time of more than three months without elective cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study. Fifty-nine patients had gallbladder stones (single stones in 27 and multiple stones in 32) and 87 patients had gallbladder in situ without stones. The time from entry to the occurrences of death or cholecystectomy was evaluated retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with these events. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 24.1±18.0 months (range 3–70 months). During follow-up, seven patients (4.8%) underwent cholecystectomy, on average 18.4 months after CBD stone removal, as the result of acute cholecystitis in four cases, biliary pain in two cases and acute pancreatitis in one case. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in four patients and open cholecystectomy in three patients. Post-operative morbidity occurred in two patients, with improvement after conservative management. Nine patients (6.2%) died as the result of unrelated biliary disease. Age, sex, presence of gallbladder stones, multiplicity of gallbladder stones and underlying disease did not correlate with subsequent cholecystectomy by Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Elective cholecystectomy is not warranted in patients with bile duct stones when the common duct can be cleared of stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy. We could not find any clinical predictors of further symptoms or complications arising from the retained gallbladder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4578061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45780612015-10-02 Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ? Kwon, Soon Kil Lee, Byung Seok Kim, Nam Jae Lee, Heon Young Chae, Hee Bok Youn, Sei Jin Park, Seon Mee Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) is controversial. The aims of this study were to assess the requirement for subsequent cholecystectomy for gallbladder-related symptoms, and to identify the patients who develop symptoms after the endoscopic removal of CBD stones. METHODS: Of 241 patients with gallbladder in situ following endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD, 146 patients (78 men and 68 women; mean age 69±13 years, range 20–93) with a follow-up time of more than three months without elective cholecystectomy were enrolled in the study. Fifty-nine patients had gallbladder stones (single stones in 27 and multiple stones in 32) and 87 patients had gallbladder in situ without stones. The time from entry to the occurrences of death or cholecystectomy was evaluated retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with these events. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 24.1±18.0 months (range 3–70 months). During follow-up, seven patients (4.8%) underwent cholecystectomy, on average 18.4 months after CBD stone removal, as the result of acute cholecystitis in four cases, biliary pain in two cases and acute pancreatitis in one case. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in four patients and open cholecystectomy in three patients. Post-operative morbidity occurred in two patients, with improvement after conservative management. Nine patients (6.2%) died as the result of unrelated biliary disease. Age, sex, presence of gallbladder stones, multiplicity of gallbladder stones and underlying disease did not correlate with subsequent cholecystectomy by Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Elective cholecystectomy is not warranted in patients with bile duct stones when the common duct can be cleared of stones by endoscopic sphincterotomy. We could not find any clinical predictors of further symptoms or complications arising from the retained gallbladder. Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2001-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4578061/ /pubmed/11855156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.4.254 Text en Copyright © 2001 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kwon, Soon Kil
Lee, Byung Seok
Kim, Nam Jae
Lee, Heon Young
Chae, Hee Bok
Youn, Sei Jin
Park, Seon Mee
Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?
title Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?
title_full Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?
title_fullStr Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?
title_full_unstemmed Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?
title_short Is Cholecystectomy Necessary After ERCP for Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Gallbladder in situ?
title_sort is cholecystectomy necessary after ercp for bile duct stones in patients with gallbladder in situ?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11855156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2001.16.4.254
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonsoonkil ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu
AT leebyungseok ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu
AT kimnamjae ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu
AT leeheonyoung ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu
AT chaeheebok ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu
AT younseijin ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu
AT parkseonmee ischolecystectomynecessaryafterercpforbileductstonesinpatientswithgallbladderinsitu