Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in chemomechanical excavation (papain) in permanent molar teeth. There are several studies dealing with primary molar teeth. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of conventional method and Carie-care (chemomechanical method) on the microshe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chittem, Jyothi, Sajjan, Girija S., Varma, Kanumuri Madhu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430299
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164034
_version_ 1782391074727133184
author Chittem, Jyothi
Sajjan, Girija S.
Varma, Kanumuri Madhu
author_facet Chittem, Jyothi
Sajjan, Girija S.
Varma, Kanumuri Madhu
author_sort Chittem, Jyothi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in chemomechanical excavation (papain) in permanent molar teeth. There are several studies dealing with primary molar teeth. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of conventional method and Carie-care (chemomechanical method) on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) and the type of failure of an adhesive system to caries-affected dentin of permanent molar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty permanent molar teeth with carious lesions extending into the dentin were selected. Through the center of the carious lesion, teeth were sectioned mesiodistally and divided into two groups based on the method of caries excavation (conventional and chemomechanical method). The time required for the completion of excavation procedure was noted. Samples were again divided into two subgroups in each according to the method of restoration (Ketac N100 and Filtek Z350 composite). The bonded interface was subjected to μSBS testing in a universal testing machine. Fractured surfaces were examined under a stereomicroscope, and representative specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope for the type of failure. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: It was achieved with unpaired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis H-test at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: The μSBS values of Carie-care groups were similar to that of the conventional method. The μSBSs of resin composite were significantly (P < 0.001) more than that of resin glass ionomer bonded irrespective of the method of caries excavation. CONCLUSION: A papain-based chemomechanical agent can be used safely as a method for caries removal when employing conventional adhesive systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4578180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45781802015-10-01 Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain) Chittem, Jyothi Sajjan, Girija S. Varma, Kanumuri Madhu J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in chemomechanical excavation (papain) in permanent molar teeth. There are several studies dealing with primary molar teeth. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of conventional method and Carie-care (chemomechanical method) on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) and the type of failure of an adhesive system to caries-affected dentin of permanent molar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty permanent molar teeth with carious lesions extending into the dentin were selected. Through the center of the carious lesion, teeth were sectioned mesiodistally and divided into two groups based on the method of caries excavation (conventional and chemomechanical method). The time required for the completion of excavation procedure was noted. Samples were again divided into two subgroups in each according to the method of restoration (Ketac N100 and Filtek Z350 composite). The bonded interface was subjected to μSBS testing in a universal testing machine. Fractured surfaces were examined under a stereomicroscope, and representative specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope for the type of failure. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: It was achieved with unpaired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis H-test at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: The μSBS values of Carie-care groups were similar to that of the conventional method. The μSBSs of resin composite were significantly (P < 0.001) more than that of resin glass ionomer bonded irrespective of the method of caries excavation. CONCLUSION: A papain-based chemomechanical agent can be used safely as a method for caries removal when employing conventional adhesive systems. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4578180/ /pubmed/26430299 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164034 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
spellingShingle Original Article
Chittem, Jyothi
Sajjan, Girija S.
Varma, Kanumuri Madhu
Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)
title Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)
title_full Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)
title_short Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)
title_sort comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430299
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164034
work_keys_str_mv AT chittemjyothi comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofthecariesaffecteddentinalsurfacetreatedwithconventionalmethodandchemomechanicalmethodpapain
AT sajjangirijas comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofthecariesaffecteddentinalsurfacetreatedwithconventionalmethodandchemomechanicalmethodpapain
AT varmakanumurimadhu comparativeevaluationofmicroshearbondstrengthofthecariesaffecteddentinalsurfacetreatedwithconventionalmethodandchemomechanicalmethodpapain