Cargando…

Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites

PURPOSE: to evaluate the shrinkage, polymerization stress, elastic and bulk modulus resulting from composites formulated by siloranes, 2(nd) generation ormocers, and dimethacrylates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bonded disc method was used to evaluate volumetric shrinkage. The polymerization stress wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bacchi, Atais, Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro, da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino, Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad, Silikas, Nikolaos, Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430302
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164051
_version_ 1782391075422339072
author Bacchi, Atais
Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro
da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino
Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad
Silikas, Nikolaos
Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins
author_facet Bacchi, Atais
Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro
da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino
Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad
Silikas, Nikolaos
Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins
author_sort Bacchi, Atais
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: to evaluate the shrinkage, polymerization stress, elastic and bulk modulus resulting from composites formulated by siloranes, 2(nd) generation ormocers, and dimethacrylates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bonded disc method was used to evaluate volumetric shrinkage. The polymerization stress was evaluated by mean of the Bioman. Cylindrical specimens (5 mm thickness and 6 mm diameter) were submitted to gradual loading. Young's and bulk modulus were obtained from the slope of the stress/strain curve. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%). RESULTS: Grandio and ormocer showed significant higher elastic and bulk modulus. Silorane presented significant lowest bulk modulus and maximum shrinkage. Ormocer and silorane presented lower values for the maximum rate of shrinkage. Extra-low shrinkage (ELS) composite presented the greatest maximum shrinkage. The higher maximum rate of shrinkage was attained by Grandio and ELS, statistically similar from each other. The silorane showed lower values of maximum stress and maximum rate of stress. The higher values of maximum stress were presented by ELS and Grandio, statistical similar between them. Grandio showed the significantly greatest maximum rate of stress. CONCLUSION: Silorane showed to promote lower shrinkage/stress among the composites, with the lowest elastic modulus. Ormocer showed lower shrinkage/stress than methacrylates despite of its high modulus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4578183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45781832015-10-01 Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites Bacchi, Atais Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad Silikas, Nikolaos Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins J Conserv Dent Original Article PURPOSE: to evaluate the shrinkage, polymerization stress, elastic and bulk modulus resulting from composites formulated by siloranes, 2(nd) generation ormocers, and dimethacrylates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bonded disc method was used to evaluate volumetric shrinkage. The polymerization stress was evaluated by mean of the Bioman. Cylindrical specimens (5 mm thickness and 6 mm diameter) were submitted to gradual loading. Young's and bulk modulus were obtained from the slope of the stress/strain curve. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%). RESULTS: Grandio and ormocer showed significant higher elastic and bulk modulus. Silorane presented significant lowest bulk modulus and maximum shrinkage. Ormocer and silorane presented lower values for the maximum rate of shrinkage. Extra-low shrinkage (ELS) composite presented the greatest maximum shrinkage. The higher maximum rate of shrinkage was attained by Grandio and ELS, statistically similar from each other. The silorane showed lower values of maximum stress and maximum rate of stress. The higher values of maximum stress were presented by ELS and Grandio, statistical similar between them. Grandio showed the significantly greatest maximum rate of stress. CONCLUSION: Silorane showed to promote lower shrinkage/stress among the composites, with the lowest elastic modulus. Ormocer showed lower shrinkage/stress than methacrylates despite of its high modulus. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4578183/ /pubmed/26430302 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164051 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
spellingShingle Original Article
Bacchi, Atais
Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro
da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino
Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad
Silikas, Nikolaos
Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins
Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
title Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
title_full Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
title_fullStr Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
title_full_unstemmed Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
title_short Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
title_sort shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430302
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164051
work_keys_str_mv AT bacchiatais shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites
AT feitosavictorpinheiro shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites
AT dasilvafonsecaandreasoaresquirino shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites
AT cavalcantelarissamariaassad shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites
AT silikasnikolaos shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites
AT schneiderluisfelipejochins shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites