Cargando…
Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites
PURPOSE: to evaluate the shrinkage, polymerization stress, elastic and bulk modulus resulting from composites formulated by siloranes, 2(nd) generation ormocers, and dimethacrylates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bonded disc method was used to evaluate volumetric shrinkage. The polymerization stress wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430302 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164051 |
_version_ | 1782391075422339072 |
---|---|
author | Bacchi, Atais Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad Silikas, Nikolaos Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins |
author_facet | Bacchi, Atais Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad Silikas, Nikolaos Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins |
author_sort | Bacchi, Atais |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: to evaluate the shrinkage, polymerization stress, elastic and bulk modulus resulting from composites formulated by siloranes, 2(nd) generation ormocers, and dimethacrylates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bonded disc method was used to evaluate volumetric shrinkage. The polymerization stress was evaluated by mean of the Bioman. Cylindrical specimens (5 mm thickness and 6 mm diameter) were submitted to gradual loading. Young's and bulk modulus were obtained from the slope of the stress/strain curve. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%). RESULTS: Grandio and ormocer showed significant higher elastic and bulk modulus. Silorane presented significant lowest bulk modulus and maximum shrinkage. Ormocer and silorane presented lower values for the maximum rate of shrinkage. Extra-low shrinkage (ELS) composite presented the greatest maximum shrinkage. The higher maximum rate of shrinkage was attained by Grandio and ELS, statistically similar from each other. The silorane showed lower values of maximum stress and maximum rate of stress. The higher values of maximum stress were presented by ELS and Grandio, statistical similar between them. Grandio showed the significantly greatest maximum rate of stress. CONCLUSION: Silorane showed to promote lower shrinkage/stress among the composites, with the lowest elastic modulus. Ormocer showed lower shrinkage/stress than methacrylates despite of its high modulus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4578183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45781832015-10-01 Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites Bacchi, Atais Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad Silikas, Nikolaos Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins J Conserv Dent Original Article PURPOSE: to evaluate the shrinkage, polymerization stress, elastic and bulk modulus resulting from composites formulated by siloranes, 2(nd) generation ormocers, and dimethacrylates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bonded disc method was used to evaluate volumetric shrinkage. The polymerization stress was evaluated by mean of the Bioman. Cylindrical specimens (5 mm thickness and 6 mm diameter) were submitted to gradual loading. Young's and bulk modulus were obtained from the slope of the stress/strain curve. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%). RESULTS: Grandio and ormocer showed significant higher elastic and bulk modulus. Silorane presented significant lowest bulk modulus and maximum shrinkage. Ormocer and silorane presented lower values for the maximum rate of shrinkage. Extra-low shrinkage (ELS) composite presented the greatest maximum shrinkage. The higher maximum rate of shrinkage was attained by Grandio and ELS, statistically similar from each other. The silorane showed lower values of maximum stress and maximum rate of stress. The higher values of maximum stress were presented by ELS and Grandio, statistical similar between them. Grandio showed the significantly greatest maximum rate of stress. CONCLUSION: Silorane showed to promote lower shrinkage/stress among the composites, with the lowest elastic modulus. Ormocer showed lower shrinkage/stress than methacrylates despite of its high modulus. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4578183/ /pubmed/26430302 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164051 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bacchi, Atais Feitosa, Victor Pinheiro da Silva Fonseca, Andrea Soares Quirino Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad Silikas, Nikolaos Schneider, Luis Felipe Jochins Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites |
title | Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites |
title_full | Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites |
title_fullStr | Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites |
title_full_unstemmed | Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites |
title_short | Shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites |
title_sort | shrinkage, stress, and modulus of dimethacrylate, ormocer, and silorane composites |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430302 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bacchiatais shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites AT feitosavictorpinheiro shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites AT dasilvafonsecaandreasoaresquirino shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites AT cavalcantelarissamariaassad shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites AT silikasnikolaos shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites AT schneiderluisfelipejochins shrinkagestressandmodulusofdimethacrylateormocerandsiloranecomposites |