Cargando…

Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study

AIMS: The purpose of this ex vivo study was to evaluate and compare the weight of debris and volume of irrigant extruded apically from teeth using different preparation techniques. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted human mandibular premolars with single canals and similar lengths were instrumen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Abhishek, Arunagiri, Doraiswamy, Pushpa, Shankarappa, Sawhny, Asheesh, Misra, Abhinav, Khetan, Kirti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430306
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164055
_version_ 1782391076322017280
author Singh, Abhishek
Arunagiri, Doraiswamy
Pushpa, Shankarappa
Sawhny, Asheesh
Misra, Abhinav
Khetan, Kirti
author_facet Singh, Abhishek
Arunagiri, Doraiswamy
Pushpa, Shankarappa
Sawhny, Asheesh
Misra, Abhinav
Khetan, Kirti
author_sort Singh, Abhishek
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The purpose of this ex vivo study was to evaluate and compare the weight of debris and volume of irrigant extruded apically from teeth using different preparation techniques. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted human mandibular premolars with single canals and similar lengths were instrumented using hand ProTaper F2 (25, 0.08; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), M-two (25, 0.06; VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne Primary (25, 0.08; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Debris and irrigant extruded during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The volume of the irrigant was measured, and then the tubes were stored in an incubator at 70°C for 2 days. The Eppendorf tubes were weighed to obtain the final weight when the extruded debris was included. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the groups. The WaveOne reciprocating system showed the maximum amount of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant among all the groups. The least amount of debris and irrigant was observed in ProTaper hand instrument (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: All instrumentation techniques were associated with debris and irrigant extrusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4578187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45781872015-10-01 Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study Singh, Abhishek Arunagiri, Doraiswamy Pushpa, Shankarappa Sawhny, Asheesh Misra, Abhinav Khetan, Kirti J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: The purpose of this ex vivo study was to evaluate and compare the weight of debris and volume of irrigant extruded apically from teeth using different preparation techniques. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted human mandibular premolars with single canals and similar lengths were instrumented using hand ProTaper F2 (25, 0.08; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), M-two (25, 0.06; VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne Primary (25, 0.08; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Debris and irrigant extruded during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The volume of the irrigant was measured, and then the tubes were stored in an incubator at 70°C for 2 days. The Eppendorf tubes were weighed to obtain the final weight when the extruded debris was included. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the groups. The WaveOne reciprocating system showed the maximum amount of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant among all the groups. The least amount of debris and irrigant was observed in ProTaper hand instrument (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: All instrumentation techniques were associated with debris and irrigant extrusion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4578187/ /pubmed/26430306 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164055 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Abhishek
Arunagiri, Doraiswamy
Pushpa, Shankarappa
Sawhny, Asheesh
Misra, Abhinav
Khetan, Kirti
Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
title Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
title_full Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
title_fullStr Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
title_short Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: An ex vivo study
title_sort apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using protaper hand, m-two rotary and waveone single file reciprocating system: an ex vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430306
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.164055
work_keys_str_mv AT singhabhishek apicalextrusionofdebrisandirrigantsusingprotaperhandmtworotaryandwaveonesinglefilereciprocatingsystemanexvivostudy
AT arunagiridoraiswamy apicalextrusionofdebrisandirrigantsusingprotaperhandmtworotaryandwaveonesinglefilereciprocatingsystemanexvivostudy
AT pushpashankarappa apicalextrusionofdebrisandirrigantsusingprotaperhandmtworotaryandwaveonesinglefilereciprocatingsystemanexvivostudy
AT sawhnyasheesh apicalextrusionofdebrisandirrigantsusingprotaperhandmtworotaryandwaveonesinglefilereciprocatingsystemanexvivostudy
AT misraabhinav apicalextrusionofdebrisandirrigantsusingprotaperhandmtworotaryandwaveonesinglefilereciprocatingsystemanexvivostudy
AT khetankirti apicalextrusionofdebrisandirrigantsusingprotaperhandmtworotaryandwaveonesinglefilereciprocatingsystemanexvivostudy