Cargando…
Critical care: Are we customer friendly?
OBJECTIVE: Assessing and enhancing family satisfaction are imperative for the provision of comprehensive intensive care. There is a paucity of Indian data exploring family's perception of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. We wanted to explore family satisfaction and whether it differed in fam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430335 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.164796 |
_version_ | 1782391077674680320 |
---|---|
author | Venkataraman, Ramesh Ranganathan, Lakshmi Rajnibala, V. Abraham, Babu K. Rajagopalan, Senthilkumar Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan |
author_facet | Venkataraman, Ramesh Ranganathan, Lakshmi Rajnibala, V. Abraham, Babu K. Rajagopalan, Senthilkumar Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan |
author_sort | Venkataraman, Ramesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Assessing and enhancing family satisfaction are imperative for the provision of comprehensive intensive care. There is a paucity of Indian data exploring family's perception of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. We wanted to explore family satisfaction and whether it differed in families of patients admitted under intensivists and nonintensivists in our semi-open ICU. METHODOLOGY: We surveyed family members of 200 consecutive patients, between March and September 2009 who were in ICU for >3 days. An internationally validated family satisfaction survey was adapted and was administered to a family member, on day 4 of the patient's stay. The survey consisted of 15 questions in five categories - patient care, medical counseling, staff interaction, visiting hours, and facilities and was set to a Likert scale of 1–4. Mean, median, and proportions were computed to describe answers for each question and category. RESULTS: A total of 515 patients were admitted during the study period, of which 200 patients stayed in the ICU >3 days. One family member each of the 200 patients completed the survey with 100% response rate. Families reported the greatest satisfaction with patient care (94.5%) and least satisfaction with visiting hours (60.5%). Chi-square tests performed for each of the five categories revealed no significant difference between satisfaction scores of intensivists and nonintensivists' patients. CONCLUSION: Family members of ICU patients were satisfied with current care and communication, irrespective of whether they were admitted under intensivists or nonintensivists. Family members preferred open visiting hours policy than a time limited one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4578193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45781932015-10-01 Critical care: Are we customer friendly? Venkataraman, Ramesh Ranganathan, Lakshmi Rajnibala, V. Abraham, Babu K. Rajagopalan, Senthilkumar Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: Assessing and enhancing family satisfaction are imperative for the provision of comprehensive intensive care. There is a paucity of Indian data exploring family's perception of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. We wanted to explore family satisfaction and whether it differed in families of patients admitted under intensivists and nonintensivists in our semi-open ICU. METHODOLOGY: We surveyed family members of 200 consecutive patients, between March and September 2009 who were in ICU for >3 days. An internationally validated family satisfaction survey was adapted and was administered to a family member, on day 4 of the patient's stay. The survey consisted of 15 questions in five categories - patient care, medical counseling, staff interaction, visiting hours, and facilities and was set to a Likert scale of 1–4. Mean, median, and proportions were computed to describe answers for each question and category. RESULTS: A total of 515 patients were admitted during the study period, of which 200 patients stayed in the ICU >3 days. One family member each of the 200 patients completed the survey with 100% response rate. Families reported the greatest satisfaction with patient care (94.5%) and least satisfaction with visiting hours (60.5%). Chi-square tests performed for each of the five categories revealed no significant difference between satisfaction scores of intensivists and nonintensivists' patients. CONCLUSION: Family members of ICU patients were satisfied with current care and communication, irrespective of whether they were admitted under intensivists or nonintensivists. Family members preferred open visiting hours policy than a time limited one. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4578193/ /pubmed/26430335 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.164796 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms |
spellingShingle | Research Article Venkataraman, Ramesh Ranganathan, Lakshmi Rajnibala, V. Abraham, Babu K. Rajagopalan, Senthilkumar Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Critical care: Are we customer friendly? |
title | Critical care: Are we customer friendly? |
title_full | Critical care: Are we customer friendly? |
title_fullStr | Critical care: Are we customer friendly? |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical care: Are we customer friendly? |
title_short | Critical care: Are we customer friendly? |
title_sort | critical care: are we customer friendly? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430335 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.164796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT venkataramanramesh criticalcarearewecustomerfriendly AT ranganathanlakshmi criticalcarearewecustomerfriendly AT rajnibalav criticalcarearewecustomerfriendly AT abrahambabuk criticalcarearewecustomerfriendly AT rajagopalansenthilkumar criticalcarearewecustomerfriendly AT ramakrishnannagarajan criticalcarearewecustomerfriendly |